File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Conference Paper: Cephalometric norms of Chinese: McNamara analysis

TitleCephalometric norms of Chinese: McNamara analysis
Authors
Issue Date2006
PublisherOxford University Press
Citation
The 81st Congress of European Orthodontic Society, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 3–7 June 2005. In European Journal of Orthodontics, 2006, v. 28 n. 2, p. e146 Abstract no.316 How to Cite?
AbstractAIM: To establish cephalometric norms in Chinese using McNamara’s (1984) analysis, and to compare them with those of Caucasians. MATERIALS AND METHOD: Lateral cephalometric radiographs taken in natural head posture of a random sample of 200 male and 205 female 12-year-old southern Chinese together with 43 male and 43 female 12-year-old British Caucasian children in Hong Kong. The radiographs were digitised twice with the CASSOS program. RESULTS: In males, the effective midface height, facial axis angle and pogonion to nasion perpendicular were significantly larger in Caucasians than in Chinese, while SNA, maxillomandibular difference, mandibular plane angle, upper incisor to point A and lower incisor to A-Po line were significantly larger in Chinese males than in Caucasian males. In females, the effective midface height and facial axis angle were significantly larger in Caucasian than in Chinese, while the maxillomandibular difference, lower anterior face height, mandibular plane angle, upper incisor to point A and lower incisor to A-Po line were significantly larger in Chinese females than in Caucasian females. CONCLUSION: There are significant differences between Caucasian and Chinese cephalometric norms using McNamara’s analysis.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/94666
ISSN
2015 Impact Factor: 1.44
2015 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.090

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorWu, Jen_HK
dc.contributor.authorHagg, EUOen_HK
dc.contributor.authorRabie, ABMen_HK
dc.date.accessioned2010-09-25T15:38:14Z-
dc.date.available2010-09-25T15:38:14Z-
dc.date.issued2006en_HK
dc.identifier.citationThe 81st Congress of European Orthodontic Society, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 3–7 June 2005. In European Journal of Orthodontics, 2006, v. 28 n. 2, p. e146 Abstract no.316en_HK
dc.identifier.issn0141-5387-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/94666-
dc.description.abstractAIM: To establish cephalometric norms in Chinese using McNamara’s (1984) analysis, and to compare them with those of Caucasians. MATERIALS AND METHOD: Lateral cephalometric radiographs taken in natural head posture of a random sample of 200 male and 205 female 12-year-old southern Chinese together with 43 male and 43 female 12-year-old British Caucasian children in Hong Kong. The radiographs were digitised twice with the CASSOS program. RESULTS: In males, the effective midface height, facial axis angle and pogonion to nasion perpendicular were significantly larger in Caucasians than in Chinese, while SNA, maxillomandibular difference, mandibular plane angle, upper incisor to point A and lower incisor to A-Po line were significantly larger in Chinese males than in Caucasian males. In females, the effective midface height and facial axis angle were significantly larger in Caucasian than in Chinese, while the maxillomandibular difference, lower anterior face height, mandibular plane angle, upper incisor to point A and lower incisor to A-Po line were significantly larger in Chinese females than in Caucasian females. CONCLUSION: There are significant differences between Caucasian and Chinese cephalometric norms using McNamara’s analysis.-
dc.languageengen_HK
dc.publisherOxford University Press-
dc.relation.ispartofEuropean Journal of Orthodonticsen_HK
dc.titleCephalometric norms of Chinese: McNamara analysisen_HK
dc.typeConference_Paperen_HK
dc.identifier.emailHagg, EUO: euohagg@hkusua.hku.hken_HK
dc.identifier.emailRabie, ABM: rabie@hkusua.hku.hken_HK
dc.identifier.authorityHagg, EUO=rp00020en_HK
dc.identifier.authorityRabie, ABM=rp00029en_HK
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.1093/ejo/cjl019-
dc.identifier.hkuros110905en_HK
dc.identifier.epage115en_HK

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats