File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Conference Paper: The scheduling and energy complexity of strong connectivity in ultra-wideband networks

TitleThe scheduling and energy complexity of strong connectivity in ultra-wideband networks
Authors
KeywordsAd hoc and sensor networks
Energy complexity
Interference control
Interference models
Scheduling complexity
Ultra-wideband
Issue Date2006
Citation
Acm Mswim 2006 - Proceedings Of The 9Th Acm Symposium On Modeling, Analysis And Simulation Of Wireless And Mobile Systems, 2006, v. 2006, p. 282-290 How to Cite?
AbstractRecently Moscibroda and Wattenhofer came up with the notion of scheduling complexity to capture the minimum amount of time to successfully schedule all the transmission requests under the physical SINR model. Their algorithm featuring a non-linear power assignment can schedule strongly connected transmissions in narrowband networks with O(log4 n) timeslots. In this paper, we first generalize this result to ultra-wideband networks. We show the strong connectivity scheduling complexity in UWB networks to be O(log(n/w) · log3 n), where m is the processing gain. Secondly, we show that both of these polylogarithmic scheduling complexity results are gained at the expense of exponential energy complexity with lower bound ω(n · 2n). We also prove the upper bound of the energy complexity in narrowband networks to be O(n2 · 2na), and for UWB networks, this upper bound can be reduced by a processing gain factor. On the other hand, we show that improving the scheduling complexity through arbitrary power control has its limitations, and that different power assignment strategies have different impacts on the protocol interference models, which was often neglected in the design of wireless scheduling algorithms. Compared with narrowband networks, although the effect of aggregate interferences in UWB networks is greatly reduced, we demonstrate that the constant and linear power assignments in UWB networks are still inefficient in the worst case with respect to the scheduling complexity (Ω(n/m)), which suggests there is a need for a better arbitrary power assignment. Our analyses shed new light on the design of the power assignment scheme and the performance analysis of the wireless scheduling algorithms. In energy-constrained wireless networks, a tradeoff between the scheduling complexity and energy complexity is a practical consideration. Our results in this paper can be directly applied to other spread-spectrum networks including DS-CDMA and FH-CDMA. Copyright 2006 ACM.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/93180
References

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorHua, QSen_HK
dc.contributor.authorLau, FCMen_HK
dc.date.accessioned2010-09-25T14:53:19Z-
dc.date.available2010-09-25T14:53:19Z-
dc.date.issued2006en_HK
dc.identifier.citationAcm Mswim 2006 - Proceedings Of The 9Th Acm Symposium On Modeling, Analysis And Simulation Of Wireless And Mobile Systems, 2006, v. 2006, p. 282-290en_HK
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/93180-
dc.description.abstractRecently Moscibroda and Wattenhofer came up with the notion of scheduling complexity to capture the minimum amount of time to successfully schedule all the transmission requests under the physical SINR model. Their algorithm featuring a non-linear power assignment can schedule strongly connected transmissions in narrowband networks with O(log4 n) timeslots. In this paper, we first generalize this result to ultra-wideband networks. We show the strong connectivity scheduling complexity in UWB networks to be O(log(n/w) · log3 n), where m is the processing gain. Secondly, we show that both of these polylogarithmic scheduling complexity results are gained at the expense of exponential energy complexity with lower bound ω(n · 2n). We also prove the upper bound of the energy complexity in narrowband networks to be O(n2 · 2na), and for UWB networks, this upper bound can be reduced by a processing gain factor. On the other hand, we show that improving the scheduling complexity through arbitrary power control has its limitations, and that different power assignment strategies have different impacts on the protocol interference models, which was often neglected in the design of wireless scheduling algorithms. Compared with narrowband networks, although the effect of aggregate interferences in UWB networks is greatly reduced, we demonstrate that the constant and linear power assignments in UWB networks are still inefficient in the worst case with respect to the scheduling complexity (Ω(n/m)), which suggests there is a need for a better arbitrary power assignment. Our analyses shed new light on the design of the power assignment scheme and the performance analysis of the wireless scheduling algorithms. In energy-constrained wireless networks, a tradeoff between the scheduling complexity and energy complexity is a practical consideration. Our results in this paper can be directly applied to other spread-spectrum networks including DS-CDMA and FH-CDMA. Copyright 2006 ACM.en_HK
dc.languageengen_HK
dc.relation.ispartofACM MSWiM 2006 - Proceedings of the 9th ACM Symposium on Modeling, Analysis and Simulation of Wireless and Mobile Systemsen_HK
dc.subjectAd hoc and sensor networksen_HK
dc.subjectEnergy complexityen_HK
dc.subjectInterference controlen_HK
dc.subjectInterference modelsen_HK
dc.subjectScheduling complexityen_HK
dc.subjectUltra-widebanden_HK
dc.titleThe scheduling and energy complexity of strong connectivity in ultra-wideband networksen_HK
dc.typeConference_Paperen_HK
dc.identifier.emailLau, FCM:fcmlau@cs.hku.hken_HK
dc.identifier.authorityLau, FCM=rp00221en_HK
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-33750907928en_HK
dc.relation.referenceshttp://www.scopus.com/mlt/select.url?eid=2-s2.0-33750907928&selection=ref&src=s&origin=recordpageen_HK
dc.identifier.volume2006en_HK
dc.identifier.spage282en_HK
dc.identifier.epage290en_HK
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridHua, QS=15060090400en_HK
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridLau, FCM=7102749723en_HK

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats