File Download
There are no files associated with this item.
Links for fulltext
(May Require Subscription)
- Publisher Website: 10.1080/00313029800169675
- Scopus: eid_2-s2.0-0031896031
- PMID: 9534209
- WOS: WOS:000072358700012
- Find via
Supplementary
- Citations:
- Appears in Collections:
Article: Measurement of anti-dsDNA: A comparative study of two ELISA and the Crithidia assay
Title | Measurement of anti-dsDNA: A comparative study of two ELISA and the Crithidia assay |
---|---|
Authors | |
Keywords | Chemicals And Cas Registry Numbers |
Issue Date | 1998 |
Publisher | Informa Healthcare. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.tandf.co.uk/journals/titles/00313025.asp |
Citation | Pathology, 1998, v. 30 n. 1, p. 57-61 How to Cite? |
Abstract | We compared the measurement of anti-dsDNA by a commercial ELISA test (DIASTAT), an in-house ELISA and the Crithidia luciliae assay in cross-sectional sera samples of 209 systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) patients and 64 patients with a variety of rheumatological, autoimmune and non-autoimmune diseases in Hong Kong. The Crithidia assay was found to be the least sensitive (17%) but most specific (95%) method for detection of a positive result in SLE patients. The DIASTAT assay has a higher sensitivity (68%) but lower specificity (80%) than the in-house ELISA test (32% sensitivity and 89% specificity). The positive predictive value of the three assays are comparable at 90-92% while DIASTAT had the highest negative predictive value (44%). There was good linear correlation (r = 0.7) between the two ELISAs. ELISA can serve as a useful screening test for anti-dsDNA in SLE patients and doubtful cases can then be confirmed by another method such as radioimmunoassay. |
Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/91628 |
ISSN | 2023 Impact Factor: 3.6 2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.919 |
ISI Accession Number ID | |
References |
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Wong, KH | en_HK |
dc.contributor.author | Lawton, JWM | en_HK |
dc.contributor.author | Cheng, SKL | en_HK |
dc.contributor.author | Lee, SS | en_HK |
dc.contributor.author | Lau, CS | en_HK |
dc.date.accessioned | 2010-09-17T10:22:26Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2010-09-17T10:22:26Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 1998 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.citation | Pathology, 1998, v. 30 n. 1, p. 57-61 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.issn | 0031-3025 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/91628 | - |
dc.description.abstract | We compared the measurement of anti-dsDNA by a commercial ELISA test (DIASTAT), an in-house ELISA and the Crithidia luciliae assay in cross-sectional sera samples of 209 systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) patients and 64 patients with a variety of rheumatological, autoimmune and non-autoimmune diseases in Hong Kong. The Crithidia assay was found to be the least sensitive (17%) but most specific (95%) method for detection of a positive result in SLE patients. The DIASTAT assay has a higher sensitivity (68%) but lower specificity (80%) than the in-house ELISA test (32% sensitivity and 89% specificity). The positive predictive value of the three assays are comparable at 90-92% while DIASTAT had the highest negative predictive value (44%). There was good linear correlation (r = 0.7) between the two ELISAs. ELISA can serve as a useful screening test for anti-dsDNA in SLE patients and doubtful cases can then be confirmed by another method such as radioimmunoassay. | en_HK |
dc.language | eng | en_HK |
dc.publisher | Informa Healthcare. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.tandf.co.uk/journals/titles/00313025.asp | en_HK |
dc.relation.ispartof | Pathology | en_HK |
dc.subject | Chemicals And Cas Registry Numbers | en_HK |
dc.subject.mesh | Animals | en_HK |
dc.subject.mesh | Antibodies, Antinuclear - blood - immunology | en_HK |
dc.subject.mesh | Arthritis, Rheumatoid - blood - immunology | en_HK |
dc.subject.mesh | Autoantibodies - blood - immunology | en_HK |
dc.subject.mesh | Autoimmune Diseases - blood - immunology | en_HK |
dc.subject.mesh | Biological Assay - methods | en_HK |
dc.subject.mesh | Crithidia - chemistry - immunology | en_HK |
dc.subject.mesh | Data Interpretation, Statistical | en_HK |
dc.subject.mesh | Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay - methods | en_HK |
dc.subject.mesh | Humans | en_HK |
dc.subject.mesh | Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic - blood - immunology | en_HK |
dc.subject.mesh | Predictive Value of Tests | en_HK |
dc.subject.mesh | Sensitivity and Specificity | en_HK |
dc.subject.mesh | Skin Diseases - blood - immunology | en_HK |
dc.title | Measurement of anti-dsDNA: A comparative study of two ELISA and the Crithidia assay | en_HK |
dc.type | Article | en_HK |
dc.identifier.email | Lau, CS:cslau@hku.hk | en_HK |
dc.identifier.authority | Lau, CS=rp01348 | en_HK |
dc.description.nature | link_to_subscribed_fulltext | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1080/00313029800169675 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.pmid | 9534209 | - |
dc.identifier.scopus | eid_2-s2.0-0031896031 | en_HK |
dc.relation.references | http://www.scopus.com/mlt/select.url?eid=2-s2.0-0031896031&selection=ref&src=s&origin=recordpage | en_HK |
dc.identifier.volume | 30 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.issue | 1 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.spage | 57 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.epage | 61 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.isi | WOS:000072358700012 | - |
dc.publisher.place | United Kingdom | en_HK |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Wong, KH=36485841700 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Lawton, JWM=7102180792 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Cheng, SKL=36856417300 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Lee, SS=7601394467 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Lau, CS=14035682100 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.issnl | 0031-3025 | - |