File Download
There are no files associated with this item.
Links for fulltext
(May Require Subscription)
- Publisher Website: 10.1097/00005344-199608000-00021
- Scopus: eid_2-s2.0-0029744431
- PMID: 8856491
- WOS: WOS:A1996VB45100021
- Find via
Supplementary
- Citations:
- Appears in Collections:
Article: Relative efficacy and tolerability of lacidipine and amlodipine in patients with mild-to-moderate hypertension: A randomized double-blind study
Title | Relative efficacy and tolerability of lacidipine and amlodipine in patients with mild-to-moderate hypertension: A randomized double-blind study |
---|---|
Authors | |
Keywords | Chemicals And Cas Registry Numbers |
Issue Date | 1996 |
Publisher | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.cardiovascularpharm.com/ |
Citation | Journal Of Cardiovascular Pharmacology, 1996, v. 28 n. 2, p. 328-331 How to Cite? |
Abstract | Calcium channel blockers are increasingly used in the treatment of hypertension. Newer calcium channel blockers of the dihydropyridine group have longer elimination half-lives (t( 1/4 )) that permit once-daily dosage and are generally better tolerated than their parent compound. In this study, the efficacy and safety of lacidipine and amlodipine were compared in 65 patients with mild-to-moderate hypertension attending the hypertension outpatient clinic of a teaching hospital in a randomized double-blind cross-over trial with dose titration. Lacidipine and amlodipine both significantly reduced systolic blood pressure (SBP: by 19.2 ± 13.5 and 22.3 ± 15.3 mm Hg, respectively) and diastolic BP (DBP; 13.3 ± 4.2 and 12.3 ± 5.3 mm Hg, respectively) 24 h postdose. There were no significant differences in their antihypertensive effects. The incidence of adverse events (AE) was 3% for lacidipine and 8% for amlodipine. The incidence of withdrawal from the study due to side effects was 0% for lacidipine and 3% for amlodipine. These results suggest that lacidipine is well-tolerated, and is as effective us amlodipine as a once-daily antihypertensive agent. |
Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/91581 |
ISSN | 2023 Impact Factor: 2.6 2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.610 |
ISI Accession Number ID | |
References |
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Lau, CP | en_HK |
dc.contributor.author | Cheung, BMY | en_HK |
dc.date.accessioned | 2010-09-17T10:21:42Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2010-09-17T10:21:42Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 1996 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.citation | Journal Of Cardiovascular Pharmacology, 1996, v. 28 n. 2, p. 328-331 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.issn | 0160-2446 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/91581 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Calcium channel blockers are increasingly used in the treatment of hypertension. Newer calcium channel blockers of the dihydropyridine group have longer elimination half-lives (t( 1/4 )) that permit once-daily dosage and are generally better tolerated than their parent compound. In this study, the efficacy and safety of lacidipine and amlodipine were compared in 65 patients with mild-to-moderate hypertension attending the hypertension outpatient clinic of a teaching hospital in a randomized double-blind cross-over trial with dose titration. Lacidipine and amlodipine both significantly reduced systolic blood pressure (SBP: by 19.2 ± 13.5 and 22.3 ± 15.3 mm Hg, respectively) and diastolic BP (DBP; 13.3 ± 4.2 and 12.3 ± 5.3 mm Hg, respectively) 24 h postdose. There were no significant differences in their antihypertensive effects. The incidence of adverse events (AE) was 3% for lacidipine and 8% for amlodipine. The incidence of withdrawal from the study due to side effects was 0% for lacidipine and 3% for amlodipine. These results suggest that lacidipine is well-tolerated, and is as effective us amlodipine as a once-daily antihypertensive agent. | en_HK |
dc.language | eng | en_HK |
dc.publisher | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.cardiovascularpharm.com/ | en_HK |
dc.relation.ispartof | Journal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology | en_HK |
dc.subject | Chemicals And Cas Registry Numbers | en_HK |
dc.subject.mesh | Adult | en_HK |
dc.subject.mesh | Aged | en_HK |
dc.subject.mesh | Amlodipine - adverse effects - therapeutic use | en_HK |
dc.subject.mesh | Antihypertensive Agents - adverse effects - therapeutic use | en_HK |
dc.subject.mesh | Blood Pressure - drug effects | en_HK |
dc.subject.mesh | Dihydropyridines - adverse effects - therapeutic use | en_HK |
dc.subject.mesh | Double-Blind Method | en_HK |
dc.subject.mesh | Female | en_HK |
dc.subject.mesh | Half-Life | en_HK |
dc.subject.mesh | Humans | en_HK |
dc.subject.mesh | Hypertension - drug therapy - physiopathology | en_HK |
dc.subject.mesh | Male | en_HK |
dc.subject.mesh | Middle Aged | en_HK |
dc.subject.mesh | Pulse - drug effects | en_HK |
dc.title | Relative efficacy and tolerability of lacidipine and amlodipine in patients with mild-to-moderate hypertension: A randomized double-blind study | en_HK |
dc.type | Article | en_HK |
dc.identifier.email | Cheung, BMY:mycheung@hku.hk | en_HK |
dc.identifier.authority | Cheung, BMY=rp01321 | en_HK |
dc.description.nature | link_to_subscribed_fulltext | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1097/00005344-199608000-00021 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.pmid | 8856491 | - |
dc.identifier.scopus | eid_2-s2.0-0029744431 | en_HK |
dc.relation.references | http://www.scopus.com/mlt/select.url?eid=2-s2.0-0029744431&selection=ref&src=s&origin=recordpage | en_HK |
dc.identifier.volume | 28 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.issue | 2 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.spage | 328 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.epage | 331 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.isi | WOS:A1996VB45100021 | - |
dc.publisher.place | United States | en_HK |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Lau, CP=7401968501 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Cheung, BMY=7103294806 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.issnl | 0160-2446 | - |