File Download
There are no files associated with this item.
Links for fulltext
(May Require Subscription)
- Publisher Website: 10.1197/jamia.M2888
- Scopus: eid_2-s2.0-67649363324
- PMID: 19390112
- WOS: WOS:000267995500016
- Find via
Supplementary
-
Bookmarks:
- CiteULike: 2
- Citations:
- Appears in Collections:
Article: A Systematic Review of Patient Acceptance of Consumer Health Information Technology
Title | A Systematic Review of Patient Acceptance of Consumer Health Information Technology | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Authors | |||||
Keywords | References (156) View In Table Layout | ||||
Issue Date | 2009 | ||||
Publisher | Hanley & Belfus, Inc. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.elsevier.com/locate/jamia | ||||
Citation | Journal Of The American Medical Informatics Association, 2009, v. 16 n. 4, p. 550-560 How to Cite? | ||||
Abstract | A systematic literature review was performed to identify variables promoting consumer health information technology (CHIT) acceptance among patients. The electronic bibliographic databases Web of Science, Business Source Elite, CINAHL, Communication and Mass Media Complete, MEDLINE, PsycArticles, and PsycInfo were searched. A cited reference search of articles meeting the inclusion criteria was also conducted to reduce misses. Fifty-two articles met the selection criteria. Among them, 94 different variables were tested for associations with acceptance. Most of those tested (71%) were patient factors, including sociodemographic characteristics, health- and treatment-related variables, and prior experience or exposure to computer/health technology. Only ten variables were related to human-technology interaction; 16 were organizational factors; and one was related to the environment. In total, 62 (66%) were found to predict acceptance in at least one study. Existing literature focused largely on patient-related factors. No studies examined the impact of social and task factors on acceptance, and few tested the effects of organizational or environmental factors on acceptance. Future research guided by technology acceptance theories should fill those gaps to improve our understanding of patient CHIT acceptance, which in turn could lead to better CHIT design and implementation. © 2009 J Am Med Inform Assoc. | ||||
Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/91358 | ||||
ISSN | 2023 Impact Factor: 4.7 2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 2.123 | ||||
PubMed Central ID | |||||
ISI Accession Number ID |
Funding Information: This study was funded in part by a grant from the National Library of Medicine (NLM-LM 6249) to Patricia Flatley Brennan, Pl. The authors thank Samuel Alper, Richard Holden, and A. Joy Mvera for their helpful comments on the earlier versions of the manuscript and thank the anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments. | ||||
References |
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Or, CKL | en_HK |
dc.contributor.author | Karsh, BT | en_HK |
dc.date.accessioned | 2010-09-17T10:17:40Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2010-09-17T10:17:40Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2009 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.citation | Journal Of The American Medical Informatics Association, 2009, v. 16 n. 4, p. 550-560 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.issn | 1067-5027 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/91358 | - |
dc.description.abstract | A systematic literature review was performed to identify variables promoting consumer health information technology (CHIT) acceptance among patients. The electronic bibliographic databases Web of Science, Business Source Elite, CINAHL, Communication and Mass Media Complete, MEDLINE, PsycArticles, and PsycInfo were searched. A cited reference search of articles meeting the inclusion criteria was also conducted to reduce misses. Fifty-two articles met the selection criteria. Among them, 94 different variables were tested for associations with acceptance. Most of those tested (71%) were patient factors, including sociodemographic characteristics, health- and treatment-related variables, and prior experience or exposure to computer/health technology. Only ten variables were related to human-technology interaction; 16 were organizational factors; and one was related to the environment. In total, 62 (66%) were found to predict acceptance in at least one study. Existing literature focused largely on patient-related factors. No studies examined the impact of social and task factors on acceptance, and few tested the effects of organizational or environmental factors on acceptance. Future research guided by technology acceptance theories should fill those gaps to improve our understanding of patient CHIT acceptance, which in turn could lead to better CHIT design and implementation. © 2009 J Am Med Inform Assoc. | en_HK |
dc.language | eng | en_HK |
dc.publisher | Hanley & Belfus, Inc. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.elsevier.com/locate/jamia | en_HK |
dc.relation.ispartof | Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association | en_HK |
dc.subject | References (156) View In Table Layout | en_HK |
dc.title | A Systematic Review of Patient Acceptance of Consumer Health Information Technology | en_HK |
dc.type | Article | en_HK |
dc.identifier.email | Or, CKL:klor@hku.hk | en_HK |
dc.identifier.authority | Or, CKL=rp01369 | en_HK |
dc.description.nature | link_to_subscribed_fulltext | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1197/jamia.M2888 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.pmid | 19390112 | - |
dc.identifier.pmcid | PMC2705259 | - |
dc.identifier.scopus | eid_2-s2.0-67649363324 | en_HK |
dc.relation.references | http://www.scopus.com/mlt/select.url?eid=2-s2.0-67649363324&selection=ref&src=s&origin=recordpage | en_HK |
dc.identifier.volume | 16 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.issue | 4 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.spage | 550 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.epage | 560 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.eissn | 1527-974X | - |
dc.identifier.isi | WOS:000267995500016 | - |
dc.publisher.place | United States | en_HK |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Or, CKL=14834272300 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Karsh, BT=6603540921 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.citeulike | 5661046 | - |
dc.identifier.issnl | 1067-5027 | - |