File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Bond strength test: Role of operator skill

TitleBond strength test: Role of operator skill
Authors
KeywordsChemicals And Cas Registry Numbers
Issue Date2008
PublisherWiley-Blackwell Publishing Ltd.. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.wiley.com/bw/journal.asp?ref=0045-0421
Citation
Australian Dental Journal, 2008, v. 53 n. 2, p. 145-150 How to Cite?
AbstractBackground: Test method, substrate material and operator variability are factors known to affect bond strength test outcomes. The aim of this study was to determine if, with increasing experience, individual operator skill in material handling influenced microshear bond strength outcomes. Methods: This retrospective study used data collected from six preliminary tests carried out successively on enamel microshear bond strength for two adhesives: Clearfil SE Bond (Kuraray) and Adper Single Bond 2 (3M ESPE) by one operator. Mean and median microshear bond strength values, standard deviations and coefficients of variation for each adhesive test group were calculated and assessed. Results: A gradual increase in mean microshear bond strengths, a decrease in standard deviations and coefficients of variation over time for both adhesives and a progressively more uniform distribution of microshear bond strength results recorded in individual test sets was observed. The results suggest an improvement in bonding reliability as experience is gained. Conclusions: Operator skill in material handling appears to play a critical role in determining the outcome of bond strength testing. This same skill is probably relevant when using an adhesive for the first time clinically. It is important that clinicians become familiar with new adhesives in order to achieve optimal outcomes. © 2008 Australian Dental Association.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/90757
ISSN
2015 Impact Factor: 1.272
2015 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.482
ISI Accession Number ID
References

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorAdebayo, OAen_HK
dc.contributor.authorBurrow, MFen_HK
dc.contributor.authorTyas, MJen_HK
dc.date.accessioned2010-09-17T10:07:50Z-
dc.date.available2010-09-17T10:07:50Z-
dc.date.issued2008en_HK
dc.identifier.citationAustralian Dental Journal, 2008, v. 53 n. 2, p. 145-150en_HK
dc.identifier.issn0045-0421en_HK
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/90757-
dc.description.abstractBackground: Test method, substrate material and operator variability are factors known to affect bond strength test outcomes. The aim of this study was to determine if, with increasing experience, individual operator skill in material handling influenced microshear bond strength outcomes. Methods: This retrospective study used data collected from six preliminary tests carried out successively on enamel microshear bond strength for two adhesives: Clearfil SE Bond (Kuraray) and Adper Single Bond 2 (3M ESPE) by one operator. Mean and median microshear bond strength values, standard deviations and coefficients of variation for each adhesive test group were calculated and assessed. Results: A gradual increase in mean microshear bond strengths, a decrease in standard deviations and coefficients of variation over time for both adhesives and a progressively more uniform distribution of microshear bond strength results recorded in individual test sets was observed. The results suggest an improvement in bonding reliability as experience is gained. Conclusions: Operator skill in material handling appears to play a critical role in determining the outcome of bond strength testing. This same skill is probably relevant when using an adhesive for the first time clinically. It is important that clinicians become familiar with new adhesives in order to achieve optimal outcomes. © 2008 Australian Dental Association.en_HK
dc.languageengen_HK
dc.publisherWiley-Blackwell Publishing Ltd.. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.wiley.com/bw/journal.asp?ref=0045-0421en_HK
dc.relation.ispartofAustralian Dental Journalen_HK
dc.subjectChemicals And Cas Registry Numbersen_HK
dc.subject.meshAdulten_HK
dc.subject.meshBisphenol A-Glycidyl Methacrylate - chemistryen_HK
dc.subject.meshClinical Competenceen_HK
dc.subject.meshComposite Resins - chemistryen_HK
dc.subject.meshDental Bondingen_HK
dc.subject.meshDental Enamel - ultrastructureen_HK
dc.subject.meshDental Materials - chemistryen_HK
dc.subject.meshDentin - ultrastructureen_HK
dc.subject.meshDentin-Bonding Agents - chemistryen_HK
dc.subject.meshHumansen_HK
dc.subject.meshMaterials Testing - methodsen_HK
dc.subject.meshObserver Variationen_HK
dc.subject.meshResin Cements - chemistryen_HK
dc.subject.meshRetrospective Studiesen_HK
dc.subject.meshShear Strengthen_HK
dc.subject.meshStress, Mechanicalen_HK
dc.subject.meshSurface Propertiesen_HK
dc.subject.meshTime Factorsen_HK
dc.titleBond strength test: Role of operator skillen_HK
dc.typeArticleen_HK
dc.identifier.emailBurrow, MF:mfburr58@hku.hken_HK
dc.identifier.authorityBurrow, MF=rp01306en_HK
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/j.1834-7819.2008.00024.xen_HK
dc.identifier.pmid18494970-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-44249112361en_HK
dc.relation.referenceshttp://www.scopus.com/mlt/select.url?eid=2-s2.0-44249112361&selection=ref&src=s&origin=recordpageen_HK
dc.identifier.volume53en_HK
dc.identifier.issue2en_HK
dc.identifier.spage145en_HK
dc.identifier.epage150en_HK
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000256095400007-
dc.publisher.placeUnited Kingdomen_HK
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridAdebayo, OA=22633345100en_HK
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridBurrow, MF=7005876730en_HK
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridTyas, MJ=7006088443en_HK

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats