File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Effect of resin-coating technique on dentin tensile bond strengths over 3 years

TitleEffect of resin-coating technique on dentin tensile bond strengths over 3 years
Authors
KeywordsChemicals And Cas Registry Numbers
Issue Date2002
PublisherBlackwell Publishing Ltd
Citation
Journal Of Esthetic And Restorative Dentistry, 2002, v. 14 n. 2, p. 115-122 How to Cite?
AbstractPurpose: The resin-coating technique has been developed to protect prepared dentin and underlying pulp tissue. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the resin-coated dentin bond durability over a period of 3 years of a resin cement and to compare it with two representative resin cements. Materials and Methods: Ten bovine dentin specimens were tested for tensile bond strengths with each of the following three materials: CLAPEARL DC with a resin-coating technique (CDRC), Panavia 21 (PA21), and Super Bond C&B (SBCB) at 1 day, 6 months, 1 year, and 3 years. Mean bond strengths were compared statistically by two-way analysis of variance and Fisher's PLSD test (p < .05). The mode of failure was classified by scanning electron microscope observation and analyzed using the Mann-Whitney U-test. Results: The 3-year bond strengths of all resin cements were significantly lower than those at the other experimental periods except for 1 year (p < .05). There was no significant difference in mean bond strength between CDRC and SBCB (p > .05). Regarding the fracture modes, in the case of CDRC, an increase in adhesive failure at the resin-dentin interface was observed as the time period lengthened. Statistical differences were observed between SBCB and the other materials at 1 year (p < .05) and between PA21 and the other materials at 3 years (p < .05). ©2002 BC Decker Inc.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/90749
ISSN
2015 Impact Factor: 1.231
2015 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.430
References

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorKitasako, Yen_HK
dc.contributor.authorBurrow, MFen_HK
dc.contributor.authorNikaido, Ten_HK
dc.contributor.authorTagami, Jen_HK
dc.date.accessioned2010-09-17T10:07:43Z-
dc.date.available2010-09-17T10:07:43Z-
dc.date.issued2002en_HK
dc.identifier.citationJournal Of Esthetic And Restorative Dentistry, 2002, v. 14 n. 2, p. 115-122en_HK
dc.identifier.issn1496-4155en_HK
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/90749-
dc.description.abstractPurpose: The resin-coating technique has been developed to protect prepared dentin and underlying pulp tissue. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the resin-coated dentin bond durability over a period of 3 years of a resin cement and to compare it with two representative resin cements. Materials and Methods: Ten bovine dentin specimens were tested for tensile bond strengths with each of the following three materials: CLAPEARL DC with a resin-coating technique (CDRC), Panavia 21 (PA21), and Super Bond C&B (SBCB) at 1 day, 6 months, 1 year, and 3 years. Mean bond strengths were compared statistically by two-way analysis of variance and Fisher's PLSD test (p < .05). The mode of failure was classified by scanning electron microscope observation and analyzed using the Mann-Whitney U-test. Results: The 3-year bond strengths of all resin cements were significantly lower than those at the other experimental periods except for 1 year (p < .05). There was no significant difference in mean bond strength between CDRC and SBCB (p > .05). Regarding the fracture modes, in the case of CDRC, an increase in adhesive failure at the resin-dentin interface was observed as the time period lengthened. Statistical differences were observed between SBCB and the other materials at 1 year (p < .05) and between PA21 and the other materials at 3 years (p < .05). ©2002 BC Decker Inc.en_HK
dc.languageengen_HK
dc.publisherBlackwell Publishing Ltden_HK
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistryen_HK
dc.subjectChemicals And Cas Registry Numbersen_HK
dc.subject.meshAcid Etching, Dentalen_HK
dc.subject.meshAdhesivenessen_HK
dc.subject.meshAnalysis of Varianceen_HK
dc.subject.meshAnimalsen_HK
dc.subject.meshBoron Compounds - chemistryen_HK
dc.subject.meshCattleen_HK
dc.subject.meshDental Bondingen_HK
dc.subject.meshDental Cements - chemistryen_HK
dc.subject.meshDentin - ultrastructureen_HK
dc.subject.meshDentin-Bonding Agents - chemistryen_HK
dc.subject.meshMethacrylates - chemistryen_HK
dc.subject.meshMethylmethacrylates - chemistryen_HK
dc.subject.meshMicroscopy, Electron, Scanningen_HK
dc.subject.meshPhosphates - chemistryen_HK
dc.subject.meshResin Cements - chemistryen_HK
dc.subject.meshStatistics as Topicen_HK
dc.subject.meshStatistics, Nonparametricen_HK
dc.subject.meshSurface Propertiesen_HK
dc.subject.meshTensile Strengthen_HK
dc.subject.meshTime Factorsen_HK
dc.subject.meshViscosityen_HK
dc.titleEffect of resin-coating technique on dentin tensile bond strengths over 3 yearsen_HK
dc.typeArticleen_HK
dc.identifier.emailBurrow, MF:mfburr58@hku.hken_HK
dc.identifier.authorityBurrow, MF=rp01306en_HK
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/j.1708-8240.2002.tb00160.xen_HK
dc.identifier.pmid12008799en_HK
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-0036367112en_HK
dc.relation.referenceshttp://www.scopus.com/mlt/select.url?eid=2-s2.0-0036367112&selection=ref&src=s&origin=recordpageen_HK
dc.identifier.volume14en_HK
dc.identifier.issue2en_HK
dc.identifier.spage115en_HK
dc.identifier.epage122en_HK
dc.publisher.placeUnited Kingdomen_HK
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridKitasako, Y=7003435929en_HK
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridBurrow, MF=7005876730en_HK
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridNikaido, T=7102059723en_HK
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridTagami, J=7005967527en_HK

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats