File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Shear and tensile bond testing for resin cement evaluation

TitleShear and tensile bond testing for resin cement evaluation
Authors
KeywordsChemicals And Cas Registry Numbers
Issue Date1995
PublisherElsevier Inc. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.elsevier.com/locate/dental
Citation
Dental Materials, 1995, v. 11 n. 5-6, p. 298-304 How to Cite?
AbstractObjectives. The aim of this study was to compare the tensile and shear bond strengths of one experimental and four commercially available resin cements following the ISO document TR 110405 for bond measurement. Methods. Tensile and shear bond tests were performed using bovine enamel and dentin as the tooth substrate with each of the resin cements. Resin composite rods were cemented to the prepared tooth surfaces. The bond strengths were obtained 24 h after cementation, and mode of failure was classified after fracture of the bonds, both visually and by SEM observation. Results. Significant differences existed between the two bond test methods for all materials with enamel and three of the five cements when bonded to dentin. The shear test results were always the higher of the two test methods. Mode of fracture varried little for the visual classification, but the morphology from SEM observations showed considerable differences. Significance. Although there are deficiencies in the current test methods, these may be outweighed substrate variables. A test mode should be designed to determine which stresses, tensile or shear, are the greatest for different types of restorations. With this information, the type of test selected could provide appropriate information before clinical trials are commenced. © 1995.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/90713
ISSN
2015 Impact Factor: 3.931
2015 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.339
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorKitasako, Yen_HK
dc.contributor.authorBurrow, MFen_HK
dc.contributor.authorNikaido, Ten_HK
dc.contributor.authorHarada, Nen_HK
dc.contributor.authorInokoshi, Sen_HK
dc.contributor.authorYamada, Ten_HK
dc.contributor.authorTakatsu, Ten_HK
dc.date.accessioned2010-09-17T10:07:11Z-
dc.date.available2010-09-17T10:07:11Z-
dc.date.issued1995en_HK
dc.identifier.citationDental Materials, 1995, v. 11 n. 5-6, p. 298-304en_HK
dc.identifier.issn0109-5641en_HK
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/90713-
dc.description.abstractObjectives. The aim of this study was to compare the tensile and shear bond strengths of one experimental and four commercially available resin cements following the ISO document TR 110405 for bond measurement. Methods. Tensile and shear bond tests were performed using bovine enamel and dentin as the tooth substrate with each of the resin cements. Resin composite rods were cemented to the prepared tooth surfaces. The bond strengths were obtained 24 h after cementation, and mode of failure was classified after fracture of the bonds, both visually and by SEM observation. Results. Significant differences existed between the two bond test methods for all materials with enamel and three of the five cements when bonded to dentin. The shear test results were always the higher of the two test methods. Mode of fracture varried little for the visual classification, but the morphology from SEM observations showed considerable differences. Significance. Although there are deficiencies in the current test methods, these may be outweighed substrate variables. A test mode should be designed to determine which stresses, tensile or shear, are the greatest for different types of restorations. With this information, the type of test selected could provide appropriate information before clinical trials are commenced. © 1995.en_HK
dc.languageengen_HK
dc.publisherElsevier Inc. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.elsevier.com/locate/dentalen_HK
dc.relation.ispartofDental Materialsen_HK
dc.subjectChemicals And Cas Registry Numbersen_HK
dc.subject.meshAminosalicylic Acidsen_HK
dc.subject.meshAnalysis of Varianceen_HK
dc.subject.meshAnimalsen_HK
dc.subject.meshCattleen_HK
dc.subject.meshComposite Resinsen_HK
dc.subject.meshDental Bondingen_HK
dc.subject.meshDental Cementsen_HK
dc.subject.meshDental Enamelen_HK
dc.subject.meshDental Stress Analysis - methodsen_HK
dc.subject.meshDentin - ultrastructureen_HK
dc.subject.meshMaterials Testing - methodsen_HK
dc.subject.meshMethacrylatesen_HK
dc.subject.meshMicroscopy, Electron, Scanningen_HK
dc.subject.meshPhosphatesen_HK
dc.subject.meshResin Cementsen_HK
dc.subject.meshResins, Syntheticen_HK
dc.subject.meshTensile Strengthen_HK
dc.titleShear and tensile bond testing for resin cement evaluationen_HK
dc.typeArticleen_HK
dc.identifier.emailBurrow, MF:mfburr58@hku.hken_HK
dc.identifier.authorityBurrow, MF=rp01306en_HK
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.pmid8595825-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-0029366333en_HK
dc.identifier.volume11en_HK
dc.identifier.issue5-6en_HK
dc.identifier.spage298en_HK
dc.identifier.epage304en_HK
dc.identifier.isiWOS:A1995TL48700001-
dc.publisher.placeUnited Statesen_HK
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridKitasako, Y=7003435929en_HK
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridBurrow, MF=7005876730en_HK
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridNikaido, T=7102059723en_HK
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridHarada, N=14051918400en_HK
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridInokoshi, S=7004592633en_HK
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridYamada, T=8941670900en_HK
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridTakatsu, T=35993686200en_HK

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats