File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Tensile bond strengths of resin cements to bovine dentin using resin coating.

TitleTensile bond strengths of resin cements to bovine dentin using resin coating.
Authors
KeywordsChemicals And Cas Registry Numbers
Issue Date2003
PublisherMosher & Linder, Inc. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.amjdent.com
Citation
American Journal Of Dentistry, 2003, v. 16 Spec No, p. 41A-46A How to Cite?
AbstractPURPOSE: To evaluate the effect of a resin coating technique on dentin tensile bond strengths of dual-cured resin cements. METHODS: 10 bovine dentin specimens were tested for tensile bond strengths of each of the following four materials: Panavia F, Link Max, Bistite II, Rely-X. Bovine dentin ground with 600-grit SiC was bonded with a resin cement according to the manufacturers' instructions or the resin coating technique, which was used in combination with one coat of a dentin adhesive; Clearfil SE Bond, Unifil Bond, One-Up Bond F or Single Bond, with one coat of a low viscosity micro-filled resin, Protect Liner-F. Each dentin adhesive and the low viscosity micro-filled resin were cured for 10 seconds and 20 seconds respectively. After 1 day storage in water, the specimens were subjected to the tensile bond test at a crosshead speed of 2 mm/minute. The data were analyzed by two-way ANOVA and Fisher's PLSD test (P < 0.05). The mode of failure after the tensile bond test was classified by visual inspection. The resin cement - dentin interfaces were examined by SEM. RESULTS: The tensile bond strengths (MPa +/- SD) of four resin cements to dentin with/without resin coating were: Panavia F (22.9 +/- 3.1; 10.2 +/- 2.5), Link Max (16.1 +/- 4.4; 9.6 +/- 3.2), Bistite II (14.8 +/- 3.2; 14.3 +/- 3.9), and Rely-X (15.7 +/- 4.7; 13.5 +/- 4.5), respectively. The resin coating significantly improved the bond strengths of resin cements to dentin in Panavia F and Link Max, while there were no significant differences of mean bond strengths between Bistite II or Rely-X with and without resin coating (P> 0.05). Regarding the fracture modes, complete and partial adhesive failures were observed in the cases without resin coating. For the resin coating groups, the fracture modes were much more complicated, although, adhesive failures rarely occurred. Hybrid layer formation was observed for all materials used.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/90700
ISSN
2015 Impact Factor: 1.194
2015 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.443
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorNikaido, Ten_HK
dc.contributor.authorCho, Een_HK
dc.contributor.authorNakajima, Men_HK
dc.contributor.authorTashiro, Hen_HK
dc.contributor.authorToba, Sen_HK
dc.contributor.authorBurrow, MFen_HK
dc.contributor.authorTagami, Jen_HK
dc.date.accessioned2010-09-17T10:06:59Z-
dc.date.available2010-09-17T10:06:59Z-
dc.date.issued2003en_HK
dc.identifier.citationAmerican Journal Of Dentistry, 2003, v. 16 Spec No, p. 41A-46Aen_HK
dc.identifier.issn0894-8275en_HK
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/90700-
dc.description.abstractPURPOSE: To evaluate the effect of a resin coating technique on dentin tensile bond strengths of dual-cured resin cements. METHODS: 10 bovine dentin specimens were tested for tensile bond strengths of each of the following four materials: Panavia F, Link Max, Bistite II, Rely-X. Bovine dentin ground with 600-grit SiC was bonded with a resin cement according to the manufacturers' instructions or the resin coating technique, which was used in combination with one coat of a dentin adhesive; Clearfil SE Bond, Unifil Bond, One-Up Bond F or Single Bond, with one coat of a low viscosity micro-filled resin, Protect Liner-F. Each dentin adhesive and the low viscosity micro-filled resin were cured for 10 seconds and 20 seconds respectively. After 1 day storage in water, the specimens were subjected to the tensile bond test at a crosshead speed of 2 mm/minute. The data were analyzed by two-way ANOVA and Fisher's PLSD test (P < 0.05). The mode of failure after the tensile bond test was classified by visual inspection. The resin cement - dentin interfaces were examined by SEM. RESULTS: The tensile bond strengths (MPa +/- SD) of four resin cements to dentin with/without resin coating were: Panavia F (22.9 +/- 3.1; 10.2 +/- 2.5), Link Max (16.1 +/- 4.4; 9.6 +/- 3.2), Bistite II (14.8 +/- 3.2; 14.3 +/- 3.9), and Rely-X (15.7 +/- 4.7; 13.5 +/- 4.5), respectively. The resin coating significantly improved the bond strengths of resin cements to dentin in Panavia F and Link Max, while there were no significant differences of mean bond strengths between Bistite II or Rely-X with and without resin coating (P> 0.05). Regarding the fracture modes, complete and partial adhesive failures were observed in the cases without resin coating. For the resin coating groups, the fracture modes were much more complicated, although, adhesive failures rarely occurred. Hybrid layer formation was observed for all materials used.en_HK
dc.languageengen_HK
dc.publisherMosher & Linder, Inc. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.amjdent.comen_HK
dc.relation.ispartofAmerican journal of dentistryen_HK
dc.subjectChemicals And Cas Registry Numbersen_HK
dc.subject.meshAnalysis of Varianceen_HK
dc.subject.meshAnimalsen_HK
dc.subject.meshBisphenol A-Glycidyl Methacrylate - chemistryen_HK
dc.subject.meshCattleen_HK
dc.subject.meshComposite Resins - chemistryen_HK
dc.subject.meshDental Bondingen_HK
dc.subject.meshDentin - ultrastructureen_HK
dc.subject.meshDentin-Bonding Agents - chemistryen_HK
dc.subject.meshMaterials Testingen_HK
dc.subject.meshMethacrylates - chemistryen_HK
dc.subject.meshMicroscopy, Electron, Scanningen_HK
dc.subject.meshPolyethylene Glycols - chemistryen_HK
dc.subject.meshPolymethacrylic Acids - chemistryen_HK
dc.subject.meshResin Cements - chemistryen_HK
dc.subject.meshSurface Propertiesen_HK
dc.subject.meshTensile Strengthen_HK
dc.titleTensile bond strengths of resin cements to bovine dentin using resin coating.en_HK
dc.typeArticleen_HK
dc.identifier.emailBurrow, MF:mfburr58@hku.hken_HK
dc.identifier.authorityBurrow, MF=rp01306en_HK
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.pmid14674498-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-1542389186en_HK
dc.identifier.volume16 Spec Noen_HK
dc.identifier.spage41Aen_HK
dc.identifier.epage46Aen_HK
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000186640200010-
dc.publisher.placeUnited Statesen_HK
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridNikaido, T=7102059723en_HK
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridCho, E=37046001300en_HK
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridNakajima, M=7402942991en_HK
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridTashiro, H=7201777819en_HK
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridToba, S=6602078362en_HK
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridBurrow, MF=7005876730en_HK
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridTagami, J=7005967527en_HK

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats