File Download
There are no files associated with this item.
Links for fulltext
(May Require Subscription)
- Publisher Website: 10.1111/j.1834-7819.2001.tb00281.x
- Scopus: eid_2-s2.0-0035459108
- PMID: 11695158
- WOS: WOS:000171192900007
- Find via
Supplementary
- Citations:
- Appears in Collections:
Article: The microtensile strength of bonding resins
Title | The microtensile strength of bonding resins |
---|---|
Authors | |
Keywords | Chemicals And Cas Registry Numbers |
Issue Date | 2001 |
Publisher | Wiley-Blackwell Publishing Ltd.. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.wiley.com/bw/journal.asp?ref=0045-0421 |
Citation | Australian Dental Journal, 2001, v. 46 n. 3, p. 194-197 How to Cite? |
Abstract | Background: The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of water on the tensile strength of three bonding resins (All Bond 2, Scotchbond Multi-Purpose Adhesive, Clearfil LB Bond) and a low viscosity resin composite (Protect Liner F) after 1, 7, 28, 84 and 168 days of storage. Methods: Cylinders of bonding resin 2.4±0.2mm diameter and 9.5mm long were made and stored at 37°C for 24 hours. The specimens were milled into dumb-bell shapes and stored in either air or water at 370C. Five specimens of each material were stressed in tension after the specified storage times at a crosshead speed of 1mm/min in a testing jig attached to a universal testing machine. The mean tensile strengths of bonding resins were calculated and analysed statistically using one-way analysis of variance, lower standard deviation and student t-tests. Results: Comparison of the air and water samples at all test periods showed the tensile strengths of specimens stored in water were significantly less than those stored in air (P<0.001). Conclusion: The effect of water on the tensile strength of bonding resins indicated a slight decrease in strength of each material over the 168 day test period, whereas the air samples showed little change over the test period. |
Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/90676 |
ISSN | 2023 Impact Factor: 1.9 2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.597 |
ISI Accession Number ID | |
References |
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Hogan, LC | en_HK |
dc.contributor.author | Burrow, MF | en_HK |
dc.date.accessioned | 2010-09-17T10:06:38Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2010-09-17T10:06:38Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2001 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.citation | Australian Dental Journal, 2001, v. 46 n. 3, p. 194-197 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.issn | 0045-0421 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/90676 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Background: The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of water on the tensile strength of three bonding resins (All Bond 2, Scotchbond Multi-Purpose Adhesive, Clearfil LB Bond) and a low viscosity resin composite (Protect Liner F) after 1, 7, 28, 84 and 168 days of storage. Methods: Cylinders of bonding resin 2.4±0.2mm diameter and 9.5mm long were made and stored at 37°C for 24 hours. The specimens were milled into dumb-bell shapes and stored in either air or water at 370C. Five specimens of each material were stressed in tension after the specified storage times at a crosshead speed of 1mm/min in a testing jig attached to a universal testing machine. The mean tensile strengths of bonding resins were calculated and analysed statistically using one-way analysis of variance, lower standard deviation and student t-tests. Results: Comparison of the air and water samples at all test periods showed the tensile strengths of specimens stored in water were significantly less than those stored in air (P<0.001). Conclusion: The effect of water on the tensile strength of bonding resins indicated a slight decrease in strength of each material over the 168 day test period, whereas the air samples showed little change over the test period. | en_HK |
dc.language | eng | en_HK |
dc.publisher | Wiley-Blackwell Publishing Ltd.. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.wiley.com/bw/journal.asp?ref=0045-0421 | en_HK |
dc.relation.ispartof | Australian Dental Journal | en_HK |
dc.subject | Chemicals And Cas Registry Numbers | en_HK |
dc.subject.mesh | Analysis of Variance | en_HK |
dc.subject.mesh | Dental Bonding | en_HK |
dc.subject.mesh | Dentin-Bonding Agents | en_HK |
dc.subject.mesh | Drug Storage | en_HK |
dc.subject.mesh | Materials Testing | en_HK |
dc.subject.mesh | Methacrylates | en_HK |
dc.subject.mesh | Resin Cements | en_HK |
dc.subject.mesh | Tensile Strength | en_HK |
dc.subject.mesh | Time Factors | en_HK |
dc.subject.mesh | Viscosity | en_HK |
dc.subject.mesh | Water | en_HK |
dc.title | The microtensile strength of bonding resins | en_HK |
dc.type | Article | en_HK |
dc.identifier.email | Burrow, MF:mfburr58@hku.hk | en_HK |
dc.identifier.authority | Burrow, MF=rp01306 | en_HK |
dc.description.nature | link_to_subscribed_fulltext | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1111/j.1834-7819.2001.tb00281.x | - |
dc.identifier.pmid | 11695158 | - |
dc.identifier.scopus | eid_2-s2.0-0035459108 | en_HK |
dc.relation.references | http://www.scopus.com/mlt/select.url?eid=2-s2.0-0035459108&selection=ref&src=s&origin=recordpage | en_HK |
dc.identifier.volume | 46 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.issue | 3 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.spage | 194 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.epage | 197 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.isi | WOS:000171192900007 | - |
dc.publisher.place | United Kingdom | en_HK |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Hogan, LC=7006458822 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Burrow, MF=7005876730 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.issnl | 0045-0421 | - |