File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: A clinical trial comparing two all-in-one adhesive systems used to restore non-carious cervical lesions: Results at one year

TitleA clinical trial comparing two all-in-one adhesive systems used to restore non-carious cervical lesions: Results at one year
Authors
KeywordsChemicals And Cas Registry Numbers
Issue Date2008
PublisherWiley-Blackwell Publishing Ltd.. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.wiley.com/bw/journal.asp?ref=0045-0421
Citation
Australian Dental Journal, 2008, v. 53 n. 3, p. 235-238 How to Cite?
AbstractBackground: Few data exist with respect to the clinical performance of all-in-one adhesive systems. However, their clinical use is increasing. The aim of this study was to evaluate the retention and marginal staining of resin composite restorations bonded with Clearfil S3 Bond or G-Bond all-in-one systems placed in non-carious cervical lesions. Materials and methods: Sixty restorations were placed in 11 subjects, mean age 62.5 years. Approval for the clinical trial was obtained from the Human Ethics Committee of The University of Melbourne. Restorations were bonded and placed according to the manufacturers' instructions. No enamel etching was performed on the enamel margins prior to restoration placement. Patients were recalled at six months, and one year for evaluation of presence and marginal staining. Photographic records were obtained prior to restoration, immediately after and at recall. Results: All patients could be recalled. All restorations were present at both recall periods. A 100 per cent retention rate was obtained. Slight marginal staining was observed on four restorations for S3 and three restorations for G-Bond. Conclusions: The early results of this clinical evaluation showed good outcomes for both materials. © 2008 Australian Dental Association.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/90670
ISSN
2015 Impact Factor: 1.272
2015 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.482
ISI Accession Number ID
Funding AgencyGrant Number
Kuraray Medical, Japan
Funding Information:

This study is supported by Kuraray Medical, Japan. The authors are also grateful to the Royal Dental Hospital of Melbourne for the use of its clinical facilities and staff to conduct this trial.

References

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBurrow, MFen_HK
dc.contributor.authorTyas, MJen_HK
dc.date.accessioned2010-09-17T10:06:32Z-
dc.date.available2010-09-17T10:06:32Z-
dc.date.issued2008en_HK
dc.identifier.citationAustralian Dental Journal, 2008, v. 53 n. 3, p. 235-238en_HK
dc.identifier.issn0045-0421en_HK
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/90670-
dc.description.abstractBackground: Few data exist with respect to the clinical performance of all-in-one adhesive systems. However, their clinical use is increasing. The aim of this study was to evaluate the retention and marginal staining of resin composite restorations bonded with Clearfil S3 Bond or G-Bond all-in-one systems placed in non-carious cervical lesions. Materials and methods: Sixty restorations were placed in 11 subjects, mean age 62.5 years. Approval for the clinical trial was obtained from the Human Ethics Committee of The University of Melbourne. Restorations were bonded and placed according to the manufacturers' instructions. No enamel etching was performed on the enamel margins prior to restoration placement. Patients were recalled at six months, and one year for evaluation of presence and marginal staining. Photographic records were obtained prior to restoration, immediately after and at recall. Results: All patients could be recalled. All restorations were present at both recall periods. A 100 per cent retention rate was obtained. Slight marginal staining was observed on four restorations for S3 and three restorations for G-Bond. Conclusions: The early results of this clinical evaluation showed good outcomes for both materials. © 2008 Australian Dental Association.en_HK
dc.languageengen_HK
dc.publisherWiley-Blackwell Publishing Ltd.. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.wiley.com/bw/journal.asp?ref=0045-0421en_HK
dc.relation.ispartofAustralian Dental Journalen_HK
dc.subjectChemicals And Cas Registry Numbersen_HK
dc.subject.meshAdulten_HK
dc.subject.meshAgeden_HK
dc.subject.meshAged, 80 and overen_HK
dc.subject.meshDental Bonding - methodsen_HK
dc.subject.meshDental Restoration, Permanent - methodsen_HK
dc.subject.meshDentin-Bonding Agentsen_HK
dc.subject.meshHumansen_HK
dc.subject.meshMethacrylatesen_HK
dc.subject.meshMiddle Ageden_HK
dc.subject.meshResin Cementsen_HK
dc.subject.meshTooth Abrasion - therapyen_HK
dc.subject.meshTooth Cervixen_HK
dc.titleA clinical trial comparing two all-in-one adhesive systems used to restore non-carious cervical lesions: Results at one yearen_HK
dc.typeArticleen_HK
dc.identifier.emailBurrow, MF:mfburr58@hku.hken_HK
dc.identifier.authorityBurrow, MF=rp01306en_HK
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/j.1834-7819.2008.00054.xen_HK
dc.identifier.pmid18782367-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-49749119985en_HK
dc.relation.referenceshttp://www.scopus.com/mlt/select.url?eid=2-s2.0-49749119985&selection=ref&src=s&origin=recordpageen_HK
dc.identifier.volume53en_HK
dc.identifier.issue3en_HK
dc.identifier.spage235en_HK
dc.identifier.epage238en_HK
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000258580200007-
dc.publisher.placeUnited Kingdomen_HK
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridBurrow, MF=7005876730en_HK
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridTyas, MJ=35316181100en_HK

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats