File Download
There are no files associated with this item.
Links for fulltext
(May Require Subscription)
- Publisher Website: 10.2341/07-125
- Scopus: eid_2-s2.0-46949088944
- PMID: 18666505
- WOS: WOS:000257279000015
- Find via
Supplementary
- Citations:
- Appears in Collections:
Article: Comparison of enamel and dentin microshear bond strengths of a two-step self-etching priming system with five all-in-one systems
Title | Comparison of enamel and dentin microshear bond strengths of a two-step self-etching priming system with five all-in-one systems |
---|---|
Authors | |
Keywords | Chemicals And Cas Registry Numbers |
Issue Date | 2008 |
Publisher | Operative Dentistry. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.jopdent.org |
Citation | Operative Dentistry, 2008, v. 33 n. 4, p. 456-460 How to Cite? |
Abstract | Data on the adhesive strength of new all-in-one adhesives are still relatively limited. This study compared the microshear bond strengths of five recent all-in-one self-etching priming systems (G-Bond, One-Up Bond-F Plus, Clearfil S3 Bond, Adper Prompt L-Pop and Go!) with a widely used two-step self-etching priming system (Clearfil SE Bond). Human molars were sectioned and finished with 600-grit SiC paper. Both enamel and dentin were bonded using adhesives with a 0.7 mm bonding diameter. Bond strengths were tested using a microshear bond test method at a crosshead speed of 1 mm/minute. The mean bond strengths and standard deviations were calculated and analyzed using ANOVA and the Tukey's HSD test. Results showed the two-step self-etching system had significantly higher bond strengths to dentin. However, for enamel bond strength, Clearfil SE Bond showed no statistical difference to G-Bond and Go!; however, all of the other materials were statistically lower. It is necessary to examine these new materials clinically to determine their efficacy. |
Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/90668 |
ISSN | 2023 Impact Factor: 1.4 2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.617 |
ISI Accession Number ID | |
References |
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Burrow, MF | en_HK |
dc.contributor.author | Kitasako, Y | en_HK |
dc.contributor.author | Thomas, CD | en_HK |
dc.contributor.author | Tagami, J | en_HK |
dc.date.accessioned | 2010-09-17T10:06:31Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2010-09-17T10:06:31Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2008 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.citation | Operative Dentistry, 2008, v. 33 n. 4, p. 456-460 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.issn | 0361-7734 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/90668 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Data on the adhesive strength of new all-in-one adhesives are still relatively limited. This study compared the microshear bond strengths of five recent all-in-one self-etching priming systems (G-Bond, One-Up Bond-F Plus, Clearfil S3 Bond, Adper Prompt L-Pop and Go!) with a widely used two-step self-etching priming system (Clearfil SE Bond). Human molars were sectioned and finished with 600-grit SiC paper. Both enamel and dentin were bonded using adhesives with a 0.7 mm bonding diameter. Bond strengths were tested using a microshear bond test method at a crosshead speed of 1 mm/minute. The mean bond strengths and standard deviations were calculated and analyzed using ANOVA and the Tukey's HSD test. Results showed the two-step self-etching system had significantly higher bond strengths to dentin. However, for enamel bond strength, Clearfil SE Bond showed no statistical difference to G-Bond and Go!; however, all of the other materials were statistically lower. It is necessary to examine these new materials clinically to determine their efficacy. | en_HK |
dc.language | eng | en_HK |
dc.publisher | Operative Dentistry. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.jopdent.org | en_HK |
dc.relation.ispartof | Operative Dentistry | en_HK |
dc.subject | Chemicals And Cas Registry Numbers | en_HK |
dc.subject.mesh | Acid Etching, Dental - methods | en_HK |
dc.subject.mesh | Composite Resins - chemistry | en_HK |
dc.subject.mesh | Dental Bonding | en_HK |
dc.subject.mesh | Dental Enamel - ultrastructure | en_HK |
dc.subject.mesh | Dental Materials - chemistry | en_HK |
dc.subject.mesh | Dentin - ultrastructure | en_HK |
dc.subject.mesh | Dentin-Bonding Agents - chemistry | en_HK |
dc.subject.mesh | Humans | en_HK |
dc.subject.mesh | Methacrylates - chemistry | en_HK |
dc.subject.mesh | Resin Cements - chemistry | en_HK |
dc.subject.mesh | Shear Strength | en_HK |
dc.subject.mesh | Stress, Mechanical | en_HK |
dc.subject.mesh | Temperature | en_HK |
dc.subject.mesh | Time Factors | en_HK |
dc.subject.mesh | Water - chemistry | en_HK |
dc.title | Comparison of enamel and dentin microshear bond strengths of a two-step self-etching priming system with five all-in-one systems | en_HK |
dc.type | Article | en_HK |
dc.identifier.email | Burrow, MF:mfburr58@hku.hk | en_HK |
dc.identifier.authority | Burrow, MF=rp01306 | en_HK |
dc.description.nature | link_to_subscribed_fulltext | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.2341/07-125 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.pmid | 18666505 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.scopus | eid_2-s2.0-46949088944 | en_HK |
dc.relation.references | http://www.scopus.com/mlt/select.url?eid=2-s2.0-46949088944&selection=ref&src=s&origin=recordpage | en_HK |
dc.identifier.volume | 33 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.issue | 4 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.spage | 456 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.epage | 460 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.isi | WOS:000257279000015 | - |
dc.publisher.place | United States | en_HK |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Burrow, MF=7005876730 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Kitasako, Y=7003435929 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Thomas, CD=13006440800 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Tagami, J=7005967527 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.issnl | 0361-7734 | - |