File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Comparison of enamel and dentin microshear bond strengths of a two-step self-etching priming system with five all-in-one systems

TitleComparison of enamel and dentin microshear bond strengths of a two-step self-etching priming system with five all-in-one systems
Authors
KeywordsChemicals And Cas Registry Numbers
Issue Date2008
PublisherOperative Dentistry. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.jopdent.org
Citation
Operative Dentistry, 2008, v. 33 n. 4, p. 456-460 How to Cite?
AbstractData on the adhesive strength of new all-in-one adhesives are still relatively limited. This study compared the microshear bond strengths of five recent all-in-one self-etching priming systems (G-Bond, One-Up Bond-F Plus, Clearfil S3 Bond, Adper Prompt L-Pop and Go!) with a widely used two-step self-etching priming system (Clearfil SE Bond). Human molars were sectioned and finished with 600-grit SiC paper. Both enamel and dentin were bonded using adhesives with a 0.7 mm bonding diameter. Bond strengths were tested using a microshear bond test method at a crosshead speed of 1 mm/minute. The mean bond strengths and standard deviations were calculated and analyzed using ANOVA and the Tukey's HSD test. Results showed the two-step self-etching system had significantly higher bond strengths to dentin. However, for enamel bond strength, Clearfil SE Bond showed no statistical difference to G-Bond and Go!; however, all of the other materials were statistically lower. It is necessary to examine these new materials clinically to determine their efficacy.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/90668
ISSN
2015 Impact Factor: 2.819
2015 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.641
ISI Accession Number ID
References

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBurrow, MFen_HK
dc.contributor.authorKitasako, Yen_HK
dc.contributor.authorThomas, CDen_HK
dc.contributor.authorTagami, Jen_HK
dc.date.accessioned2010-09-17T10:06:31Z-
dc.date.available2010-09-17T10:06:31Z-
dc.date.issued2008en_HK
dc.identifier.citationOperative Dentistry, 2008, v. 33 n. 4, p. 456-460en_HK
dc.identifier.issn0361-7734en_HK
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/90668-
dc.description.abstractData on the adhesive strength of new all-in-one adhesives are still relatively limited. This study compared the microshear bond strengths of five recent all-in-one self-etching priming systems (G-Bond, One-Up Bond-F Plus, Clearfil S3 Bond, Adper Prompt L-Pop and Go!) with a widely used two-step self-etching priming system (Clearfil SE Bond). Human molars were sectioned and finished with 600-grit SiC paper. Both enamel and dentin were bonded using adhesives with a 0.7 mm bonding diameter. Bond strengths were tested using a microshear bond test method at a crosshead speed of 1 mm/minute. The mean bond strengths and standard deviations were calculated and analyzed using ANOVA and the Tukey's HSD test. Results showed the two-step self-etching system had significantly higher bond strengths to dentin. However, for enamel bond strength, Clearfil SE Bond showed no statistical difference to G-Bond and Go!; however, all of the other materials were statistically lower. It is necessary to examine these new materials clinically to determine their efficacy.en_HK
dc.languageengen_HK
dc.publisherOperative Dentistry. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.jopdent.orgen_HK
dc.relation.ispartofOperative Dentistryen_HK
dc.subjectChemicals And Cas Registry Numbersen_HK
dc.subject.meshAcid Etching, Dental - methodsen_HK
dc.subject.meshComposite Resins - chemistryen_HK
dc.subject.meshDental Bondingen_HK
dc.subject.meshDental Enamel - ultrastructureen_HK
dc.subject.meshDental Materials - chemistryen_HK
dc.subject.meshDentin - ultrastructureen_HK
dc.subject.meshDentin-Bonding Agents - chemistryen_HK
dc.subject.meshHumansen_HK
dc.subject.meshMethacrylates - chemistryen_HK
dc.subject.meshResin Cements - chemistryen_HK
dc.subject.meshShear Strengthen_HK
dc.subject.meshStress, Mechanicalen_HK
dc.subject.meshTemperatureen_HK
dc.subject.meshTime Factorsen_HK
dc.subject.meshWater - chemistryen_HK
dc.titleComparison of enamel and dentin microshear bond strengths of a two-step self-etching priming system with five all-in-one systemsen_HK
dc.typeArticleen_HK
dc.identifier.emailBurrow, MF:mfburr58@hku.hken_HK
dc.identifier.authorityBurrow, MF=rp01306en_HK
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.2341/07-125en_HK
dc.identifier.pmid18666505en_HK
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-46949088944en_HK
dc.relation.referenceshttp://www.scopus.com/mlt/select.url?eid=2-s2.0-46949088944&selection=ref&src=s&origin=recordpageen_HK
dc.identifier.volume33en_HK
dc.identifier.issue4en_HK
dc.identifier.spage456en_HK
dc.identifier.epage460en_HK
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000257279000015-
dc.publisher.placeUnited Statesen_HK
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridBurrow, MF=7005876730en_HK
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridKitasako, Y=7003435929en_HK
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridThomas, CD=13006440800en_HK
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridTagami, J=7005967527en_HK

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats