File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Resin adhesion to caries-affected dentine after different removal methods

TitleResin adhesion to caries-affected dentine after different removal methods
Authors
KeywordsChemicals And Cas Registry Numbers
Issue Date2006
PublisherWiley-Blackwell Publishing Ltd.. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.wiley.com/bw/journal.asp?ref=0045-0421
Citation
Australian Dental Journal, 2006, v. 51 n. 2, p. 162-169 How to Cite?
AbstractBackground: Caries-affected dentine is the common bonding substrate when treating a patient. At present, there are many methods used for caries removal. The aim of this study was to evaluate the microtensile bond strength of two adhesives (Clearfil Protect Bond and OptiBond Solo Plus Total-Etch) to caries-affected dentine after three different caries removal methods. Methods: Extracted carious human third molars were used and caries-affected dentine surfaces were obtained from one of the three removal methods: (i) round steel bur in a slow-speed handpiece; (ii) Er:YAG laser; or (iii) 600-grit silicon carbide abrasive paper. Each of the adhesives was used to bond resin composite to the caries-affected dentine according to the manufacturers' instructions. Hourglass-shaped specimens were prepared and stressed in tension at 1mm/min. Data were analysed using two-way analysis of variance and least significant difference test. Results: Clearfil Protect Bond showed significantly lower bond strength than OptiBond Solo Plus Total-Etch after caries removal with round steel bur, but the opposite was found for specimens treated with silicon carbide abrasive paper. For laser-treated dentine, no significant differences between the adhesives were revealed. Conclusions: Besides the differences in adhesives, different caries removal methods seem to influence resin adhesion to caries-affected dentine.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/90656
ISSN
2015 Impact Factor: 1.272
2015 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.482
ISI Accession Number ID
References

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorSattabanasuk, Ven_HK
dc.contributor.authorBurrow, MFen_HK
dc.contributor.authorShimada, Yen_HK
dc.contributor.authorTagami, Jen_HK
dc.date.accessioned2010-09-17T10:06:20Z-
dc.date.available2010-09-17T10:06:20Z-
dc.date.issued2006en_HK
dc.identifier.citationAustralian Dental Journal, 2006, v. 51 n. 2, p. 162-169en_HK
dc.identifier.issn0045-0421en_HK
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/90656-
dc.description.abstractBackground: Caries-affected dentine is the common bonding substrate when treating a patient. At present, there are many methods used for caries removal. The aim of this study was to evaluate the microtensile bond strength of two adhesives (Clearfil Protect Bond and OptiBond Solo Plus Total-Etch) to caries-affected dentine after three different caries removal methods. Methods: Extracted carious human third molars were used and caries-affected dentine surfaces were obtained from one of the three removal methods: (i) round steel bur in a slow-speed handpiece; (ii) Er:YAG laser; or (iii) 600-grit silicon carbide abrasive paper. Each of the adhesives was used to bond resin composite to the caries-affected dentine according to the manufacturers' instructions. Hourglass-shaped specimens were prepared and stressed in tension at 1mm/min. Data were analysed using two-way analysis of variance and least significant difference test. Results: Clearfil Protect Bond showed significantly lower bond strength than OptiBond Solo Plus Total-Etch after caries removal with round steel bur, but the opposite was found for specimens treated with silicon carbide abrasive paper. For laser-treated dentine, no significant differences between the adhesives were revealed. Conclusions: Besides the differences in adhesives, different caries removal methods seem to influence resin adhesion to caries-affected dentine.en_HK
dc.languageengen_HK
dc.publisherWiley-Blackwell Publishing Ltd.. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.wiley.com/bw/journal.asp?ref=0045-0421en_HK
dc.relation.ispartofAustralian Dental Journalen_HK
dc.subjectChemicals And Cas Registry Numbersen_HK
dc.subject.meshAnalysis of Varianceen_HK
dc.subject.meshChi-Square Distributionen_HK
dc.subject.meshDental Caries - therapyen_HK
dc.subject.meshDentin - chemistryen_HK
dc.subject.meshDentin-Bonding Agents - chemistryen_HK
dc.subject.meshHumansen_HK
dc.subject.meshLaser Therapyen_HK
dc.subject.meshMethacrylates - chemistryen_HK
dc.subject.meshStatistics, Nonparametricen_HK
dc.subject.meshTooth Preparation - methodsen_HK
dc.titleResin adhesion to caries-affected dentine after different removal methodsen_HK
dc.typeArticleen_HK
dc.identifier.emailBurrow, MF:mfburr58@hku.hken_HK
dc.identifier.authorityBurrow, MF=rp01306en_HK
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.pmid16848265-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-33745911925en_HK
dc.relation.referenceshttp://www.scopus.com/mlt/select.url?eid=2-s2.0-33745911925&selection=ref&src=s&origin=recordpageen_HK
dc.identifier.volume51en_HK
dc.identifier.issue2en_HK
dc.identifier.spage162en_HK
dc.identifier.epage169en_HK
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000238904800010-
dc.publisher.placeUnited Kingdomen_HK
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridSattabanasuk, V=8863191100en_HK
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridBurrow, MF=7005876730en_HK
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridShimada, Y=7402123770en_HK
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridTagami, J=7005967527en_HK

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats