File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Biocompatibility of a Flowable Composite Bonded with a Self-etching Adhesive Compared with a Glass Ionomer Cement and a High Copper Amalgam

TitleBiocompatibility of a Flowable Composite Bonded with a Self-etching Adhesive Compared with a Glass Ionomer Cement and a High Copper Amalgam
Authors
KeywordsChemicals And Cas Registry Numbers
Issue Date2004
PublisherOperative Dentistry. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.jopdent.org
Citation
Operative Dentistry, 2004, v. 29 n. 1, p. 23-28 How to Cite?
AbstractThis study evaluated the pulpal response and in-vivo microleakage of a flowable composite bonded with a self-etching adhesive and compared the results with a glass ionomer cement and amalgam. Cervical cavities were prepared in monkey teeth. The teeth were randomly divided into three groups. A self-etching primer system (Imperva FluoroBond, Shofu) was applied to the teeth in one of the experimental groups, and the cavities were filled with a flowable composite (SI-BF-2001-LF, Shofu). In the other groups, a glass ionomer cement (Fuji II, GC) or amalgam (Dispersalloy, Johnson & Johnson) filled the cavity. The teeth were then extracted after 3, 30 and 90 days, fixed in 10% buffered formalin solution and prepared according to routine histological techniques. Five micrometer sections were stained with hematoxylin and eosin or Brown and Brenn gram stain for bacterial observation. No serious inflammatory reaction of the pulp, such as necrosis or abscess formation, was observed in any of the experimental groups. Slight inflammatory cell infiltration was the main initial reaction, while deposition of reparative dentin was the major long-term reaction in all groups. No bacterial penetration along the cavity walls was detected in the flowable composite or glass ionomer cement except for one case at 30 days in the glass ionomer cement. The flowable composite bonded with self-etching adhesive showed an acceptable biological compatibility to monkey pulp. The in vivo sealing ability of the flowable composite in combination with the self-etching adhesive was considered comparable to glass ionomer cement. Amalgam restorations without adhesive liners showed slight bacterial penetration along the cavity wall.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/90652
ISSN
2015 Impact Factor: 2.819
2015 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.641
ISI Accession Number ID
References

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorShimada, Yen_HK
dc.contributor.authorSeki, Yen_HK
dc.contributor.authorSasafuchi, Yen_HK
dc.contributor.authorArakawa, Men_HK
dc.contributor.authorBurrow, MFen_HK
dc.contributor.authorOtsuki, Men_HK
dc.contributor.authorTagami, Jen_HK
dc.date.accessioned2010-09-17T10:06:17Z-
dc.date.available2010-09-17T10:06:17Z-
dc.date.issued2004en_HK
dc.identifier.citationOperative Dentistry, 2004, v. 29 n. 1, p. 23-28en_HK
dc.identifier.issn0361-7734en_HK
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/90652-
dc.description.abstractThis study evaluated the pulpal response and in-vivo microleakage of a flowable composite bonded with a self-etching adhesive and compared the results with a glass ionomer cement and amalgam. Cervical cavities were prepared in monkey teeth. The teeth were randomly divided into three groups. A self-etching primer system (Imperva FluoroBond, Shofu) was applied to the teeth in one of the experimental groups, and the cavities were filled with a flowable composite (SI-BF-2001-LF, Shofu). In the other groups, a glass ionomer cement (Fuji II, GC) or amalgam (Dispersalloy, Johnson & Johnson) filled the cavity. The teeth were then extracted after 3, 30 and 90 days, fixed in 10% buffered formalin solution and prepared according to routine histological techniques. Five micrometer sections were stained with hematoxylin and eosin or Brown and Brenn gram stain for bacterial observation. No serious inflammatory reaction of the pulp, such as necrosis or abscess formation, was observed in any of the experimental groups. Slight inflammatory cell infiltration was the main initial reaction, while deposition of reparative dentin was the major long-term reaction in all groups. No bacterial penetration along the cavity walls was detected in the flowable composite or glass ionomer cement except for one case at 30 days in the glass ionomer cement. The flowable composite bonded with self-etching adhesive showed an acceptable biological compatibility to monkey pulp. The in vivo sealing ability of the flowable composite in combination with the self-etching adhesive was considered comparable to glass ionomer cement. Amalgam restorations without adhesive liners showed slight bacterial penetration along the cavity wall.en_HK
dc.languageengen_HK
dc.publisherOperative Dentistry. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.jopdent.orgen_HK
dc.relation.ispartofOperative Dentistryen_HK
dc.subjectChemicals And Cas Registry Numbersen_HK
dc.subject.meshAnalysis of Varianceen_HK
dc.subject.meshAnimalsen_HK
dc.subject.meshBiocompatible Materials - chemistryen_HK
dc.subject.meshComposite Resins - chemistryen_HK
dc.subject.meshCopper - chemistryen_HK
dc.subject.meshDental Alloys - chemistryen_HK
dc.subject.meshDental Amalgam - chemistryen_HK
dc.subject.meshDental Bondingen_HK
dc.subject.meshDental Etchingen_HK
dc.subject.meshDental Leakage - classification - microbiologyen_HK
dc.subject.meshDental Pulp - pathologyen_HK
dc.subject.meshDentin, Secondary - pathologyen_HK
dc.subject.meshDentin-Bonding Agents - chemistryen_HK
dc.subject.meshGlass Ionomer Cements - chemistryen_HK
dc.subject.meshMacacaen_HK
dc.subject.meshMaterials Testingen_HK
dc.subject.meshRandom Allocationen_HK
dc.subject.meshTime Factorsen_HK
dc.titleBiocompatibility of a Flowable Composite Bonded with a Self-etching Adhesive Compared with a Glass Ionomer Cement and a High Copper Amalgamen_HK
dc.typeArticleen_HK
dc.identifier.emailBurrow, MF:mfburr58@hku.hken_HK
dc.identifier.authorityBurrow, MF=rp01306en_HK
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.pmid14753328-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-1642519907en_HK
dc.relation.referenceshttp://www.scopus.com/mlt/select.url?eid=2-s2.0-1642519907&selection=ref&src=s&origin=recordpageen_HK
dc.identifier.volume29en_HK
dc.identifier.issue1en_HK
dc.identifier.spage23en_HK
dc.identifier.epage28en_HK
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000188000500005-
dc.publisher.placeUnited Statesen_HK
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridShimada, Y=7402123770en_HK
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridSeki, Y=8931646300en_HK
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridSasafuchi, Y=7801690685en_HK
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridArakawa, M=7201401810en_HK
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridBurrow, MF=7005876730en_HK
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridOtsuki, M=7202018027en_HK
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridTagami, J=7005967527en_HK

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats