File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Adhesion of resin-modified glass ionomer cements using resin bonding systems

TitleAdhesion of resin-modified glass ionomer cements using resin bonding systems
Authors
KeywordsChemicals And Cas Registry Numbers
Issue Date1998
PublisherElsevier Ltd. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.elsevier.com/locate/jdent
Citation
Journal Of Dentistry, 1998, v. 26 n. 5-6, p. 479-485 How to Cite?
AbstractObjectives: To compare the in vitro shear bond strength of two commercially available resin-modified glass ionomer cements (RmGIC) to bovine dentine, with and without the use of adhesive bonding systems. Methods: Ninety-six flat bovine dentine surfaces were divided into eight groups for bonding procedures. Fuji II LC and Vitremer were bonded to dentine that had been treated with and without Clearfil Photo Bond, Clearfil Liner Bond, or Clearfil Liner Bond II. The control group consisted of specimens that were treated as recommended by the manufacturer of each resin-modified glass ionomer cement. The bonded assemblies were stored in tap water for 24 h at 37°C, and shear bond strengths measured using a universal-testing machine at a crosshead speed of 1 mm/min. Results: For the control group, shear bond strength of Fuji II LC was significantly greater than Vitremer (P < 0.005). However, when any of the resin bonding systems was applied, no statistical difference between Fuji II LC and Vitremer was determined (P > 0.05). The Clearfil PhotoBond and Liner Bond groups showed similar bond strengths (P > 0.05), but were significantly less than Liner Bond II (P < 0.001). Conclusions: A recent bonding system combined with the RmGICs exhibited the greatest shear bond strength to dentine, irrespective of chemical differences that may exist between the two RmGICs. © 1998 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/90631
ISSN
2015 Impact Factor: 3.109
2015 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.029
ISI Accession Number ID
References

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorPereira, PNRen_HK
dc.contributor.authorYamada, Ten_HK
dc.contributor.authorInokoshi, Sen_HK
dc.contributor.authorBurrow, MFen_HK
dc.contributor.authorSano, Hen_HK
dc.contributor.authorTagami, Jen_HK
dc.date.accessioned2010-09-17T10:05:58Z-
dc.date.available2010-09-17T10:05:58Z-
dc.date.issued1998en_HK
dc.identifier.citationJournal Of Dentistry, 1998, v. 26 n. 5-6, p. 479-485en_HK
dc.identifier.issn0300-5712en_HK
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/90631-
dc.description.abstractObjectives: To compare the in vitro shear bond strength of two commercially available resin-modified glass ionomer cements (RmGIC) to bovine dentine, with and without the use of adhesive bonding systems. Methods: Ninety-six flat bovine dentine surfaces were divided into eight groups for bonding procedures. Fuji II LC and Vitremer were bonded to dentine that had been treated with and without Clearfil Photo Bond, Clearfil Liner Bond, or Clearfil Liner Bond II. The control group consisted of specimens that were treated as recommended by the manufacturer of each resin-modified glass ionomer cement. The bonded assemblies were stored in tap water for 24 h at 37°C, and shear bond strengths measured using a universal-testing machine at a crosshead speed of 1 mm/min. Results: For the control group, shear bond strength of Fuji II LC was significantly greater than Vitremer (P < 0.005). However, when any of the resin bonding systems was applied, no statistical difference between Fuji II LC and Vitremer was determined (P > 0.05). The Clearfil PhotoBond and Liner Bond groups showed similar bond strengths (P > 0.05), but were significantly less than Liner Bond II (P < 0.001). Conclusions: A recent bonding system combined with the RmGICs exhibited the greatest shear bond strength to dentine, irrespective of chemical differences that may exist between the two RmGICs. © 1998 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.en_HK
dc.languageengen_HK
dc.publisherElsevier Ltd. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.elsevier.com/locate/jdenten_HK
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Dentistryen_HK
dc.subjectChemicals And Cas Registry Numbersen_HK
dc.subject.meshAdhesives - chemistryen_HK
dc.subject.meshAnimalsen_HK
dc.subject.meshCattleen_HK
dc.subject.meshComposite Resins - chemistryen_HK
dc.subject.meshDental Bondingen_HK
dc.subject.meshDental Stress Analysis - instrumentationen_HK
dc.subject.meshDentin - ultrastructureen_HK
dc.subject.meshDentin-Bonding Agents - chemistryen_HK
dc.subject.meshGlass Ionomer Cements - chemistryen_HK
dc.subject.meshMaterials Testingen_HK
dc.subject.meshMethacrylates - chemistryen_HK
dc.subject.meshResin Cements - chemistryen_HK
dc.subject.meshResins, Synthetic - chemistryen_HK
dc.subject.meshStress, Mechanicalen_HK
dc.subject.meshTemperatureen_HK
dc.subject.meshWater - chemistryen_HK
dc.titleAdhesion of resin-modified glass ionomer cements using resin bonding systemsen_HK
dc.typeArticleen_HK
dc.identifier.emailBurrow, MF:mfburr58@hku.hken_HK
dc.identifier.authorityBurrow, MF=rp01306en_HK
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.pmid9699441-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-0032114079en_HK
dc.relation.referenceshttp://www.scopus.com/mlt/select.url?eid=2-s2.0-0032114079&selection=ref&src=s&origin=recordpageen_HK
dc.identifier.volume26en_HK
dc.identifier.issue5-6en_HK
dc.identifier.spage479en_HK
dc.identifier.epage485en_HK
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000074781000015-
dc.publisher.placeUnited Kingdomen_HK
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridPereira, PNR=7202938166en_HK
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridYamada, T=8941670900en_HK
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridInokoshi, S=7004592633en_HK
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridBurrow, MF=7005876730en_HK
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridSano, H=7403159147en_HK
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridTagami, J=7005967527en_HK

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats