File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Effect of Operator Variability on Dentin Adhesion: Students vs. Dentists

TitleEffect of Operator Variability on Dentin Adhesion: Students vs. Dentists
Authors
KeywordsChemicals And Cas Registry Numbers
Issue Date1998
Citation
Dental Materials Journal, 1998, v. 17 n. 1, p. 51-58 How to Cite?
AbstractThe purpose of this study was to evaluate the operator variability of two dentin bonding systems. Fourteen undergraduate students and ten dentists of different levels of clinical experience were selected. Tensile bond strengths between resin composite and bovine dentin using dentin adhesive systems (Clearfil Liner Bond II : LB II ; Scotchbond Multi-Purpose: MP) bonding systems showed a large scatter among students and dentists. The dentists group demonstrated no statistically significant differences for mean bond strengths between LB II and MP. The student group recorded a statistically greater bond strength using LB II. The mean coefficient of variation of the dentists group showed no statistically significant difference between LB II and MP, however that of the students group was lower with LB II. When using MP, the dentist group demonstrated a lower coefficient of variation than that of the student group. In order to obtain optimal bonding performance, or when beginning the use of a new system, the operator should be aware of the technique sensitivity of some adhesive systems and sensitivity to operator variability.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/90625
ISSN
2015 Impact Factor: 1.087
2015 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.474
References

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorSano, Hen_HK
dc.contributor.authorKanemura, Nen_HK
dc.contributor.authorBurrow, MFen_HK
dc.contributor.authorInai, Nen_HK
dc.contributor.authorYamada, Ten_HK
dc.contributor.authorTagami, Jen_HK
dc.date.accessioned2010-09-17T10:05:52Z-
dc.date.available2010-09-17T10:05:52Z-
dc.date.issued1998en_HK
dc.identifier.citationDental Materials Journal, 1998, v. 17 n. 1, p. 51-58en_HK
dc.identifier.issn0287-4547en_HK
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/90625-
dc.description.abstractThe purpose of this study was to evaluate the operator variability of two dentin bonding systems. Fourteen undergraduate students and ten dentists of different levels of clinical experience were selected. Tensile bond strengths between resin composite and bovine dentin using dentin adhesive systems (Clearfil Liner Bond II : LB II ; Scotchbond Multi-Purpose: MP) bonding systems showed a large scatter among students and dentists. The dentists group demonstrated no statistically significant differences for mean bond strengths between LB II and MP. The student group recorded a statistically greater bond strength using LB II. The mean coefficient of variation of the dentists group showed no statistically significant difference between LB II and MP, however that of the students group was lower with LB II. When using MP, the dentist group demonstrated a lower coefficient of variation than that of the student group. In order to obtain optimal bonding performance, or when beginning the use of a new system, the operator should be aware of the technique sensitivity of some adhesive systems and sensitivity to operator variability.en_HK
dc.languageengen_HK
dc.relation.ispartofDental Materials Journalen_HK
dc.subjectChemicals And Cas Registry Numbersen_HK
dc.subject.meshAnalysis of Varianceen_HK
dc.subject.meshAnimalsen_HK
dc.subject.meshCattleen_HK
dc.subject.meshClinical Competenceen_HK
dc.subject.meshDental Bonding - methodsen_HK
dc.subject.meshDentin-Bonding Agentsen_HK
dc.subject.meshDentistsen_HK
dc.subject.meshFaculty, Dentalen_HK
dc.subject.meshMaterials Testingen_HK
dc.subject.meshMethacrylatesen_HK
dc.subject.meshReproducibility of Resultsen_HK
dc.subject.meshResin Cementsen_HK
dc.subject.meshStudents, Dentalen_HK
dc.subject.meshTensile Strengthen_HK
dc.titleEffect of Operator Variability on Dentin Adhesion: Students vs. Dentistsen_HK
dc.typeArticleen_HK
dc.identifier.emailBurrow, MF:mfburr58@hku.hken_HK
dc.identifier.authorityBurrow, MF=rp01306en_HK
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.pmid9663062-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-0032016128en_HK
dc.relation.referenceshttp://www.scopus.com/mlt/select.url?eid=2-s2.0-0032016128&selection=ref&src=s&origin=recordpageen_HK
dc.identifier.volume17en_HK
dc.identifier.issue1en_HK
dc.identifier.spage51en_HK
dc.identifier.epage58en_HK
dc.publisher.placeJapanen_HK
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridSano, H=7403159147en_HK
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridKanemura, N=6602098286en_HK
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridBurrow, MF=7005876730en_HK
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridInai, N=6701635764en_HK
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridYamada, T=8941670900en_HK
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridTagami, J=7005967527en_HK

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats