File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Early tensile bond strengths of several enamel and dentin bonding systems.

TitleEarly tensile bond strengths of several enamel and dentin bonding systems.
Authors
KeywordsChemicals And Cas Registry Numbers
Issue Date1994
PublisherSage Publications, Inc.. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.sagepub.com/journalsProdDesc.nav?prodId=Journal201925
Citation
Journal Of Dental Research, 1994, v. 73 n. 2, p. 522-528 How to Cite?
AbstractTensile bond strength tests are commonly used for the evaluation of adhesive dental materials. The majority of these tests are carried out after 24 h of storage in water. However, determination of the early tensile bond strength could be more important, especially in relation to gap formation between the cavity surface and the restorative material. This study investigated the tensile bond strengths of five enamel/dentin bonding systems and two experimental dentin bonding systems. Tensile bond strengths were obtained at one min, ten min, and 24 h after the resin composite was cured. Bond strengths at the early stages were always somewhat less than the 24-hour test results. For the enamel/dentin bonding systems, a significant difference was found between the enamel and dentin bond strengths at all time periods, except with Superbond D-liner and Liner Bond. The experimental group with glyceryl methacrylate as the primer produced a good 24-hour result (14.3 MPa), but the early bond strengths were no different from those in the non-primer-treated groups. It was concluded that this material may actually retard the polymerization of the bonding resin. Previous workers have suggested that a tensile bond strength in the order of 20 MPa is necessary for gap-free restorations to be obtained. Should this be the case, then all of the materials tested, from the aspect of early bond strength, lack the strength for prevention of gap formation, although Superbond D-liner and Liner Bond approached this hypothetical figure. These systems, Superbond D-liner and Liner Bond, also exhibit small differences between the enamel and dentin tensile bond strengths.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/90609
ISSN
2015 Impact Factor: 4.602
2015 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.714
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBurrow, MFen_HK
dc.contributor.authorTagami, Jen_HK
dc.contributor.authorNegishi, Ten_HK
dc.contributor.authorNikaido, Ten_HK
dc.contributor.authorHosoda, Hen_HK
dc.date.accessioned2010-09-17T10:05:38Z-
dc.date.available2010-09-17T10:05:38Z-
dc.date.issued1994en_HK
dc.identifier.citationJournal Of Dental Research, 1994, v. 73 n. 2, p. 522-528en_HK
dc.identifier.issn0022-0345en_HK
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/90609-
dc.description.abstractTensile bond strength tests are commonly used for the evaluation of adhesive dental materials. The majority of these tests are carried out after 24 h of storage in water. However, determination of the early tensile bond strength could be more important, especially in relation to gap formation between the cavity surface and the restorative material. This study investigated the tensile bond strengths of five enamel/dentin bonding systems and two experimental dentin bonding systems. Tensile bond strengths were obtained at one min, ten min, and 24 h after the resin composite was cured. Bond strengths at the early stages were always somewhat less than the 24-hour test results. For the enamel/dentin bonding systems, a significant difference was found between the enamel and dentin bond strengths at all time periods, except with Superbond D-liner and Liner Bond. The experimental group with glyceryl methacrylate as the primer produced a good 24-hour result (14.3 MPa), but the early bond strengths were no different from those in the non-primer-treated groups. It was concluded that this material may actually retard the polymerization of the bonding resin. Previous workers have suggested that a tensile bond strength in the order of 20 MPa is necessary for gap-free restorations to be obtained. Should this be the case, then all of the materials tested, from the aspect of early bond strength, lack the strength for prevention of gap formation, although Superbond D-liner and Liner Bond approached this hypothetical figure. These systems, Superbond D-liner and Liner Bond, also exhibit small differences between the enamel and dentin tensile bond strengths.en_HK
dc.languageengen_HK
dc.publisherSage Publications, Inc.. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.sagepub.com/journalsProdDesc.nav?prodId=Journal201925en_HK
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Dental Researchen_HK
dc.subjectChemicals And Cas Registry Numbersen_HK
dc.subject.meshAnalysis of Varianceen_HK
dc.subject.meshAnimalsen_HK
dc.subject.meshCattleen_HK
dc.subject.meshComposite Resins - chemistryen_HK
dc.subject.meshDental Bonding - methodsen_HK
dc.subject.meshDental Cements - chemistryen_HK
dc.subject.meshDental Enamel - ultrastructureen_HK
dc.subject.meshDentin - ultrastructureen_HK
dc.subject.meshDentin-Bonding Agents - chemistryen_HK
dc.subject.meshEdetic Acid - chemistryen_HK
dc.subject.meshGlycerides - chemistryen_HK
dc.subject.meshMaterials Testingen_HK
dc.subject.meshMethacrylates - chemistryen_HK
dc.subject.meshMicroscopy, Electron, Scanningen_HK
dc.subject.meshResin Cementsen_HK
dc.subject.meshSurface Propertiesen_HK
dc.subject.meshTensile Strengthen_HK
dc.titleEarly tensile bond strengths of several enamel and dentin bonding systems.en_HK
dc.typeArticleen_HK
dc.identifier.emailBurrow, MF:mfburr58@hku.hken_HK
dc.identifier.authorityBurrow, MF=rp01306en_HK
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.pmid8120216en_HK
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-0028371978en_HK
dc.identifier.volume73en_HK
dc.identifier.issue2en_HK
dc.identifier.spage522en_HK
dc.identifier.epage528en_HK
dc.identifier.isiWOS:A1994NA04100007-
dc.publisher.placeUnited Statesen_HK
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridBurrow, MF=7005876730en_HK
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridTagami, J=7005967527en_HK
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridNegishi, T=36845863800en_HK
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridNikaido, T=7102059723en_HK
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridHosoda, H=7102404396en_HK

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats