File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Bond strength to crown and root dentin

TitleBond strength to crown and root dentin
Authors
KeywordsChemicals And Cas Registry Numbers
Issue Date1996
PublisherMosher & Linder, Inc. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.amjdent.com
Citation
American Journal Of Dentistry, 1996, v. 9 n. 5, p. 223-229 How to Cite?
AbstractPurpose: To investigate (1) the tensile bond strengths of four commercial dentin bonding systems to bovine crown and root dentin and (2) the structure of the hybrid layers for each system bonded to the two dentin substrates. Materials and Methods: Superficial surfaces were exposed in bovine crown and root dentin. The teeth were embedded in plaster and a 3 mm diameter bonding area was demarcated. The four bonding systems used were AllBond 2, Super-Bond D-Liner Plus, Clearfil Liner Bond II, and ProBond. Bonding procedures followed the manufacturers' instructions with the exception of Super-Bond D-Liner Plus where the primer was left in situ for 60 seconds. Tensile bond strengths were tested after 24-hour storage in 37°C deionized water. Specimens were also prepared for SEM observation of the hybrid layer, after treatment with 10% phosphoric acid, and 10% phosphoric acid and 5% sodium hypochlorite. Results: Statistically lower bond strengths to crown dentin when compared with root dentin were observed for All-Bond 2, whereas Liner Bond II showed the opposite (P<0.01). Both ProBond and Super-Bond D-Liner Plus showed no statistical differences between crown and root dentin (P>0.05). Hybrid layers could be observed for All-Bond 2, Liner Bond II and Super-Bond D-Liner Plus, with no apparent differences between the hybrid layers of crown and root dentin. In the case of ProBond, where the smear layer was not removed during the priming stage, it appeared that the primer had infiltrated and caused hybridization of the smear layer. The differences in bond Strength were thought to be related to the different bonding mechanisms of each material, as well as possible variations in the crown and root dentin substrates.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/90608
ISSN
2015 Impact Factor: 1.194
2015 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.443
ISI Accession Number ID
References

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBurrow, MFen_HK
dc.contributor.authorSano, Hen_HK
dc.contributor.authorNakajima, Men_HK
dc.contributor.authorHarada, Nen_HK
dc.contributor.authorTagami, Jen_HK
dc.date.accessioned2010-09-17T10:05:37Z-
dc.date.available2010-09-17T10:05:37Z-
dc.date.issued1996en_HK
dc.identifier.citationAmerican Journal Of Dentistry, 1996, v. 9 n. 5, p. 223-229en_HK
dc.identifier.issn0894-8275en_HK
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/90608-
dc.description.abstractPurpose: To investigate (1) the tensile bond strengths of four commercial dentin bonding systems to bovine crown and root dentin and (2) the structure of the hybrid layers for each system bonded to the two dentin substrates. Materials and Methods: Superficial surfaces were exposed in bovine crown and root dentin. The teeth were embedded in plaster and a 3 mm diameter bonding area was demarcated. The four bonding systems used were AllBond 2, Super-Bond D-Liner Plus, Clearfil Liner Bond II, and ProBond. Bonding procedures followed the manufacturers' instructions with the exception of Super-Bond D-Liner Plus where the primer was left in situ for 60 seconds. Tensile bond strengths were tested after 24-hour storage in 37°C deionized water. Specimens were also prepared for SEM observation of the hybrid layer, after treatment with 10% phosphoric acid, and 10% phosphoric acid and 5% sodium hypochlorite. Results: Statistically lower bond strengths to crown dentin when compared with root dentin were observed for All-Bond 2, whereas Liner Bond II showed the opposite (P<0.01). Both ProBond and Super-Bond D-Liner Plus showed no statistical differences between crown and root dentin (P>0.05). Hybrid layers could be observed for All-Bond 2, Liner Bond II and Super-Bond D-Liner Plus, with no apparent differences between the hybrid layers of crown and root dentin. In the case of ProBond, where the smear layer was not removed during the priming stage, it appeared that the primer had infiltrated and caused hybridization of the smear layer. The differences in bond Strength were thought to be related to the different bonding mechanisms of each material, as well as possible variations in the crown and root dentin substrates.en_HK
dc.languageengen_HK
dc.publisherMosher & Linder, Inc. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.amjdent.comen_HK
dc.relation.ispartofAmerican Journal of Dentistryen_HK
dc.subjectChemicals And Cas Registry Numbersen_HK
dc.subject.meshAcid Etching, Dental - methodsen_HK
dc.subject.meshAnimalsen_HK
dc.subject.meshCattleen_HK
dc.subject.meshComposite Resins - chemistryen_HK
dc.subject.meshDental Bondingen_HK
dc.subject.meshDentin - ultrastructureen_HK
dc.subject.meshDentin-Bonding Agents - chemistryen_HK
dc.subject.meshHumansen_HK
dc.subject.meshMaterials Testingen_HK
dc.subject.meshMechanicsen_HK
dc.subject.meshMethacrylates - chemistryen_HK
dc.subject.meshMicroscopy, Electron, Scanningen_HK
dc.subject.meshPhosphoric Acidsen_HK
dc.subject.meshSmear Layeren_HK
dc.subject.meshSodium Hypochloriteen_HK
dc.subject.meshSurface Propertiesen_HK
dc.subject.meshTensile Strengthen_HK
dc.subject.meshTooth Crown - ultrastructureen_HK
dc.subject.meshTooth Root - ultrastructureen_HK
dc.titleBond strength to crown and root dentinen_HK
dc.typeArticleen_HK
dc.identifier.emailBurrow, MF:mfburr58@hku.hken_HK
dc.identifier.authorityBurrow, MF=rp01306en_HK
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.pmid9545910-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-0030251714en_HK
dc.relation.referenceshttp://www.scopus.com/mlt/select.url?eid=2-s2.0-0030251714&selection=ref&src=s&origin=recordpageen_HK
dc.identifier.volume9en_HK
dc.identifier.issue5en_HK
dc.identifier.spage223en_HK
dc.identifier.epage229en_HK
dc.identifier.isiWOS:A1996VW20600010-
dc.publisher.placeUnited Statesen_HK
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridBurrow, MF=7005876730en_HK
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridSano, H=7403159147en_HK
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridNakajima, M=7402942991en_HK
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridHarada, N=14051918400en_HK
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridTagami, J=7005967527en_HK

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats