File Download
There are no files associated with this item.
Links for fulltext
(May Require Subscription)
- Publisher Website: 10.1111/j.1540-6210.2006.00555.x
- Scopus: eid_2-s2.0-33645062429
- WOS: WOS:000235047700006
- Find via
Supplementary
- Citations:
- Appears in Collections:
Article: Strategy content and organizational performance: An empirical analysis
Title | Strategy content and organizational performance: An empirical analysis |
---|---|
Authors | |
Issue Date | 2006 |
Publisher | Blackwell Publishing, Inc. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journals/PAR |
Citation | Public Administration Review, 2006, v. 66 n. 1, p. 52-63 How to Cite? |
Abstract | This study presents the first empirical test of the proposition that strategy content is a key determinant of organizational performance in the public sector. Strategy content comprises two dimensions: strategic stance (the extent to which an organization is a prospector, defender, or reactor) and strategic actions (the relative emphasis on changes in markets, services, revenues, external relationships, and internal characteristics). Data were drawn from a multiple-informant survey of 119 English local authorities. Measures of strategy content are included in a multivariate model of interauthority variations in performance. The statistical results show that strategy content matters. Organizational performance is positively associated with a prospector stance and negatively with a reactor stance. Furthermore, local authorities that seek new markets for their services are more likely to perform well. These results suggest that measures of strategy content must be included in valid theoretical and empirical models of organizational performance in the public sector. |
Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/89803 |
ISSN | 2023 Impact Factor: 6.1 2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 3.148 |
ISI Accession Number ID | |
References |
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Andrews, R | en_HK |
dc.contributor.author | Boyne, GA | en_HK |
dc.contributor.author | Walker, RM | en_HK |
dc.date.accessioned | 2010-09-06T10:01:59Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2010-09-06T10:01:59Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2006 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.citation | Public Administration Review, 2006, v. 66 n. 1, p. 52-63 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.issn | 0033-3352 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/89803 | - |
dc.description.abstract | This study presents the first empirical test of the proposition that strategy content is a key determinant of organizational performance in the public sector. Strategy content comprises two dimensions: strategic stance (the extent to which an organization is a prospector, defender, or reactor) and strategic actions (the relative emphasis on changes in markets, services, revenues, external relationships, and internal characteristics). Data were drawn from a multiple-informant survey of 119 English local authorities. Measures of strategy content are included in a multivariate model of interauthority variations in performance. The statistical results show that strategy content matters. Organizational performance is positively associated with a prospector stance and negatively with a reactor stance. Furthermore, local authorities that seek new markets for their services are more likely to perform well. These results suggest that measures of strategy content must be included in valid theoretical and empirical models of organizational performance in the public sector. | en_HK |
dc.language | eng | en_HK |
dc.publisher | Blackwell Publishing, Inc. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journals/PAR | en_HK |
dc.relation.ispartof | Public Administration Review | en_HK |
dc.title | Strategy content and organizational performance: An empirical analysis | en_HK |
dc.type | Article | en_HK |
dc.identifier.openurl | http://library.hku.hk:4550/resserv?sid=HKU:IR&issn=0033-3352&volume=66&issue=1&spage=52&epage=63&date=2006&atitle=Strategy+Content+and+Organizational+Performance:+An+Empirical+Analysis | en_HK |
dc.identifier.email | Walker, RM: rwalker@hkucc.hku.hk | en_HK |
dc.identifier.authority | Walker, RM=rp00876 | en_HK |
dc.description.nature | link_to_subscribed_fulltext | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1111/j.1540-6210.2006.00555.x | en_HK |
dc.identifier.scopus | eid_2-s2.0-33645062429 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.hkuros | 121210 | en_HK |
dc.relation.references | http://www.scopus.com/mlt/select.url?eid=2-s2.0-33645062429&selection=ref&src=s&origin=recordpage | en_HK |
dc.identifier.volume | 66 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.issue | 1 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.spage | 52 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.epage | 63 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.isi | WOS:000235047700006 | - |
dc.publisher.place | United States | en_HK |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Andrews, R=9637387400 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Boyne, GA=7004356569 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Walker, RM=7404929478 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.citeulike | 461490 | - |
dc.identifier.issnl | 0033-3352 | - |