File Download
There are no files associated with this item.
Links for fulltext
(May Require Subscription)
- Publisher Website: 10.1002/csr.168
- Scopus: eid_2-s2.0-42549115843
- WOS: WOS:000207980000005
- Find via
Supplementary
- Citations:
- Appears in Collections:
Article: Extended producer responsibility and eco-design changes: Perspectives from China
Title | Extended producer responsibility and eco-design changes: Perspectives from China |
---|---|
Authors | |
Keywords | China Eco-design Electrical and electronic equipment Extended producer responsibility RoHS WEEE |
Issue Date | 2008 |
Publisher | John Wiley & Sons Ltd. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.wiley.com/WileyCDA/WileyTitle/productCd-CSR.html |
Citation | Corporate Social Responsibility And Environmental Management, 2008, v. 15 n. 2, p. 111-124 How to Cite? |
Abstract | The concept of extended producer responsibility (EPR) has been incorporated into environmental policy by a growing number of governments. Inspired by EPR initiatives of the European Union, China has also enacted similar legislation, known as China RoHS and China WEEE. Despite high expectations, the actual influence of EPR legislation on product design changes remains ambiguous. Based on the findings of 36 questionnaires and in-depth interviews with China's electrical and electronic (EE) manufacturers, this paper explores the responses of China's EE companies to China RoHS and WEEE and makes comparisons between responses to EPR legislation in the EU and China, building on the previous work of the authors. In order to evaluate the influence of EPR legislation in motivating environmental design changes, drivers and barriers for adopting eco-design are also investigated. It is found that the impact of EPR regulations in China is low. There is little evidence that EPR has stimulated systematic eco-design. Copyright © 2007 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd and ERP Environment. |
Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/89765 |
ISSN | 2023 Impact Factor: 8.3 2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 2.201 |
ISI Accession Number ID | |
References |
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Yu, J | en_HK |
dc.contributor.author | Hills, P | en_HK |
dc.contributor.author | Welford, R | en_HK |
dc.date.accessioned | 2010-09-06T10:01:31Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2010-09-06T10:01:31Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2008 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.citation | Corporate Social Responsibility And Environmental Management, 2008, v. 15 n. 2, p. 111-124 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.issn | 1535-3958 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/89765 | - |
dc.description.abstract | The concept of extended producer responsibility (EPR) has been incorporated into environmental policy by a growing number of governments. Inspired by EPR initiatives of the European Union, China has also enacted similar legislation, known as China RoHS and China WEEE. Despite high expectations, the actual influence of EPR legislation on product design changes remains ambiguous. Based on the findings of 36 questionnaires and in-depth interviews with China's electrical and electronic (EE) manufacturers, this paper explores the responses of China's EE companies to China RoHS and WEEE and makes comparisons between responses to EPR legislation in the EU and China, building on the previous work of the authors. In order to evaluate the influence of EPR legislation in motivating environmental design changes, drivers and barriers for adopting eco-design are also investigated. It is found that the impact of EPR regulations in China is low. There is little evidence that EPR has stimulated systematic eco-design. Copyright © 2007 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd and ERP Environment. | en_HK |
dc.language | eng | en_HK |
dc.publisher | John Wiley & Sons Ltd. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.wiley.com/WileyCDA/WileyTitle/productCd-CSR.html | en_HK |
dc.relation.ispartof | Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management | en_HK |
dc.rights | Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management. Copyright © John Wiley & Sons Ltd. | en_HK |
dc.subject | China | en_HK |
dc.subject | Eco-design | en_HK |
dc.subject | Electrical and electronic equipment | en_HK |
dc.subject | Extended producer responsibility | en_HK |
dc.subject | RoHS | en_HK |
dc.subject | WEEE | en_HK |
dc.title | Extended producer responsibility and eco-design changes: Perspectives from China | en_HK |
dc.type | Article | en_HK |
dc.identifier.openurl | http://library.hku.hk:4550/resserv?sid=HKU:IR&issn=1535-3958&volume=15&issue=2&spage=111&epage=124&date=2008&atitle=Extended+Producer+Responsibility+and+Eco-design+Changes:+Perspectives+from+China | en_HK |
dc.identifier.email | Hills, P: phills@hkucc.hku.hk | en_HK |
dc.identifier.email | Welford, R: rwelford@hkucc.hku.hk | en_HK |
dc.identifier.authority | Hills, P=rp00858 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.authority | Welford, R=rp00879 | en_HK |
dc.description.nature | link_to_subscribed_fulltext | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1002/csr.168 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.scopus | eid_2-s2.0-42549115843 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.hkuros | 144676 | en_HK |
dc.relation.references | http://www.scopus.com/mlt/select.url?eid=2-s2.0-42549115843&selection=ref&src=s&origin=recordpage | en_HK |
dc.identifier.volume | 15 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.issue | 2 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.spage | 111 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.epage | 124 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.isi | WOS:000207980000005 | - |
dc.publisher.place | United Kingdom | en_HK |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Yu, J=15137763500 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Hills, P=15135723100 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Welford, R=6603821264 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.issnl | 1535-3958 | - |