File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Stroop interference in Chinese and English

TitleStroop interference in Chinese and English
Authors
Issue Date2000
PublisherPsychology Press. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.tandf.co.uk/journals/titles/13803395.asp
Citation
Journal Of Clinical And Experimental Neuropsychology, 2000, v. 22 n. 4, p. 465-471 How to Cite?
AbstractThis study examined whether Chinese and English orthographies would bring about a different Stroop effect. Eighty-five right-handed participants belonging to Chinese-English bilingual and English monolingual groups were invited to participate. The Stroop Color-Word Test - Victoria version (VST) and the Chinese version of the VST (CST) were the outcome measures. The bilinguals completed both the VST and CST, whereas the monolinguals performed only the VST. The results in both between- and within-group comparisons revealed no significant difference in Stroop effect no matter whether Chinese or English orthographies were used. This does not support the orthographic variation hypothesis and suggests that Chinese orthography does not generate a greater Stroop effect than English orthography.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/89531
ISSN
2015 Impact Factor: 1.693
ISI Accession Number ID
References

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorLee, TMCen_HK
dc.contributor.authorChan, CCHen_HK
dc.date.accessioned2010-09-06T09:58:12Z-
dc.date.available2010-09-06T09:58:12Z-
dc.date.issued2000en_HK
dc.identifier.citationJournal Of Clinical And Experimental Neuropsychology, 2000, v. 22 n. 4, p. 465-471en_HK
dc.identifier.issn1380-3395en_HK
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/89531-
dc.description.abstractThis study examined whether Chinese and English orthographies would bring about a different Stroop effect. Eighty-five right-handed participants belonging to Chinese-English bilingual and English monolingual groups were invited to participate. The Stroop Color-Word Test - Victoria version (VST) and the Chinese version of the VST (CST) were the outcome measures. The bilinguals completed both the VST and CST, whereas the monolinguals performed only the VST. The results in both between- and within-group comparisons revealed no significant difference in Stroop effect no matter whether Chinese or English orthographies were used. This does not support the orthographic variation hypothesis and suggests that Chinese orthography does not generate a greater Stroop effect than English orthography.en_HK
dc.languageengen_HK
dc.publisherPsychology Press. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.tandf.co.uk/journals/titles/13803395.aspen_HK
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychologyen_HK
dc.rightsNeuropsychology, Development and Cognition. Section A: Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology. Copyright © Psychology Press.en_HK
dc.titleStroop interference in Chinese and Englishen_HK
dc.typeArticleen_HK
dc.identifier.openurlhttp://library.hku.hk:4550/resserv?sid=HKU:IR&issn=1380-3395&volume=22&spage=465&epage=471&date=2000&atitle=Stroop+interference+in+Chinese+and+Englishen_HK
dc.identifier.emailLee, TMC:tmclee@hku.hken_HK
dc.identifier.authorityLee, TMC=rp00564en_HK
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.pmid10923056-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-0033776456en_HK
dc.identifier.hkuros60228en_HK
dc.relation.referenceshttp://www.scopus.com/mlt/select.url?eid=2-s2.0-0033776456&selection=ref&src=s&origin=recordpageen_HK
dc.identifier.volume22en_HK
dc.identifier.issue4en_HK
dc.identifier.spage465en_HK
dc.identifier.epage471en_HK
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000088550400004-
dc.publisher.placeUnited Kingdomen_HK
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridLee, TMC=7501437381en_HK
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridChan, CCH=16244174500en_HK

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats