File Download
There are no files associated with this item.
Links for fulltext
(May Require Subscription)
- Publisher Website: 10.1016/j.contraception.2006.02.012
- Scopus: eid_2-s2.0-33745028165
- PMID: 16781253
- WOS: WOS:000238728400003
- Find via
Supplementary
- Citations:
- Appears in Collections:
Article: Women's perceptions on medical abortion
Title | Women's perceptions on medical abortion |
---|---|
Authors | |
Keywords | Medical abortion Perceptions |
Issue Date | 2006 |
Publisher | Elsevier Inc. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.elsevier.com/locate/contraception |
Citation | Contraception, 2006, v. 74 n. 1, p. 11-15 How to Cite? |
Abstract | The reasons why women choose medical abortion vary in different countries. In most countries, the most common reasons for choosing medical abortion are as follows: (a) avoidance of surgery or general anesthesia; (b) perception that it is safer; and (c) perception that it is more natural than a surgical procedure. In most studies, over 80% of women who chose medical abortion found it acceptable and would choose the same method again if they needed another abortion in the future. They would also recommend this procedure to other women who need an abortion. In selected women, the administration of misoprostol at home was also acceptable. The acceptability of medical abortion may decrease with increasing gestational age of pregnancy, failure of medical abortion, prolonged bleeding and high levels of discomfort and anxiety during the abortion procedure. There was no significant difference in the emotional responses or incidences of psychiatric morbidity between women undergoing medical and women undergoing surgical abortion. © 2006 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/87268 |
ISSN | 2023 Impact Factor: 2.8 2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.210 |
ISI Accession Number ID | |
References |
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Ho, PC | en_HK |
dc.date.accessioned | 2010-09-06T09:27:30Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2010-09-06T09:27:30Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2006 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.citation | Contraception, 2006, v. 74 n. 1, p. 11-15 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.issn | 0010-7824 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/87268 | - |
dc.description.abstract | The reasons why women choose medical abortion vary in different countries. In most countries, the most common reasons for choosing medical abortion are as follows: (a) avoidance of surgery or general anesthesia; (b) perception that it is safer; and (c) perception that it is more natural than a surgical procedure. In most studies, over 80% of women who chose medical abortion found it acceptable and would choose the same method again if they needed another abortion in the future. They would also recommend this procedure to other women who need an abortion. In selected women, the administration of misoprostol at home was also acceptable. The acceptability of medical abortion may decrease with increasing gestational age of pregnancy, failure of medical abortion, prolonged bleeding and high levels of discomfort and anxiety during the abortion procedure. There was no significant difference in the emotional responses or incidences of psychiatric morbidity between women undergoing medical and women undergoing surgical abortion. © 2006 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. | en_HK |
dc.language | eng | en_HK |
dc.publisher | Elsevier Inc. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.elsevier.com/locate/contraception | en_HK |
dc.relation.ispartof | Contraception | en_HK |
dc.rights | Contraception. Copyright © Elsevier Inc. | en_HK |
dc.subject | Medical abortion | en_HK |
dc.subject | Perceptions | en_HK |
dc.title | Women's perceptions on medical abortion | en_HK |
dc.type | Article | en_HK |
dc.identifier.openurl | http://library.hku.hk:4550/resserv?sid=HKU:IR&issn=0010-7824&volume=74&spage=11&epage=15&date=2006&atitle=Women%27s+perceptions+on+medical+abortion | en_HK |
dc.identifier.email | Ho, PC:pcho@hku.hk | en_HK |
dc.identifier.authority | Ho, PC=rp00325 | en_HK |
dc.description.nature | link_to_subscribed_fulltext | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1016/j.contraception.2006.02.012 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.pmid | 16781253 | - |
dc.identifier.scopus | eid_2-s2.0-33745028165 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.hkuros | 135842 | en_HK |
dc.relation.references | http://www.scopus.com/mlt/select.url?eid=2-s2.0-33745028165&selection=ref&src=s&origin=recordpage | en_HK |
dc.identifier.volume | 74 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.issue | 1 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.spage | 11 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.epage | 15 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.isi | WOS:000238728400003 | - |
dc.publisher.place | United States | en_HK |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Ho, PC=7402211440 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.issnl | 0010-7824 | - |