File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: The Chinese medical interview satisfaction scale-revised (C-MISS-R): Development and validation

TitleThe Chinese medical interview satisfaction scale-revised (C-MISS-R): Development and validation
Authors
KeywordsAssessment
Chinese
Consultation
Satisfaction
Issue Date2005
PublisherSpringer Verlag Dordrecht. The Journal's web site is located at http://springerlink.metapress.com/openurl.asp?genre=journal&issn=0962-9343
Citation
Quality Of Life Research, 2005, v. 14 n. 4, p. 1187-1192 How to Cite?
AbstractBackground: The Medical Interview Satisfaction Scale (MISS) measures patient consultation satisfaction. We validated a translated short-form of the original MISS on Hong Kong Chinese women with breast cancer. Methods: The four highest scoring MISS Cognitive and Affective sub-scales items were administered in Chinese (C-MISS) to 224 female out patients. Phrasing revisions (C-MISS-R) were tested on 82 women. Random split tested factor structure stability. Convergent, divergent and criterion validation against other instruments was performed on 405 women. Results: Two-factors accounted for 61.7% of variance but factor loadings differed from the original. Phrasing revision increased Affective sub-scale item-item correlations exceeding 0.3-64%. Two factors matching those of the original MISS, accounting for 65.2% of variance, explained 36.6 (Cognitive) and 28.8% (Affective) of variance, respectively. Alpha was 0.84, 0.74 and 0.83 for the Cognitive and Affective sub-scales and total respectively. Correlations of difficulties with treatment decision making (r = -0.298), Self-efficacy (r = 0.194), optimism (r = 0.33), psychological morbidity (r=-209), marital status, education and age indicated acceptable validity. Test-retest reliability was 0.410. Discussion: The Chinese MISS-Revised (C-MISS-R) has suitable factor structure and psychometric properties for use in consultation studies among Chinese female populations. Further validation is needed for males. © Springer 2005.
DescriptionBrief communication
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/86782
ISSN
2021 Impact Factor: 3.440
2020 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.280
ISI Accession Number ID
References

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorLam, WWTen_HK
dc.contributor.authorFielding, Ren_HK
dc.contributor.authorChow, Len_HK
dc.contributor.authorChan, Men_HK
dc.contributor.authorLeung, GMen_HK
dc.contributor.authorHo, EYYen_HK
dc.date.accessioned2010-09-06T09:21:15Z-
dc.date.available2010-09-06T09:21:15Z-
dc.date.issued2005en_HK
dc.identifier.citationQuality Of Life Research, 2005, v. 14 n. 4, p. 1187-1192en_HK
dc.identifier.issn0962-9343en_HK
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/86782-
dc.descriptionBrief communication-
dc.description.abstractBackground: The Medical Interview Satisfaction Scale (MISS) measures patient consultation satisfaction. We validated a translated short-form of the original MISS on Hong Kong Chinese women with breast cancer. Methods: The four highest scoring MISS Cognitive and Affective sub-scales items were administered in Chinese (C-MISS) to 224 female out patients. Phrasing revisions (C-MISS-R) were tested on 82 women. Random split tested factor structure stability. Convergent, divergent and criterion validation against other instruments was performed on 405 women. Results: Two-factors accounted for 61.7% of variance but factor loadings differed from the original. Phrasing revision increased Affective sub-scale item-item correlations exceeding 0.3-64%. Two factors matching those of the original MISS, accounting for 65.2% of variance, explained 36.6 (Cognitive) and 28.8% (Affective) of variance, respectively. Alpha was 0.84, 0.74 and 0.83 for the Cognitive and Affective sub-scales and total respectively. Correlations of difficulties with treatment decision making (r = -0.298), Self-efficacy (r = 0.194), optimism (r = 0.33), psychological morbidity (r=-209), marital status, education and age indicated acceptable validity. Test-retest reliability was 0.410. Discussion: The Chinese MISS-Revised (C-MISS-R) has suitable factor structure and psychometric properties for use in consultation studies among Chinese female populations. Further validation is needed for males. © Springer 2005.en_HK
dc.languageengen_HK
dc.publisherSpringer Verlag Dordrecht. The Journal's web site is located at http://springerlink.metapress.com/openurl.asp?genre=journal&issn=0962-9343en_HK
dc.relation.ispartofQuality of Life Researchen_HK
dc.subjectAssessment-
dc.subjectChinese-
dc.subjectConsultation-
dc.subjectSatisfaction-
dc.subject.meshAgeden_HK
dc.subject.meshBreast Neoplasms - psychologyen_HK
dc.subject.meshDecision Makingen_HK
dc.subject.meshFemaleen_HK
dc.subject.meshHong Kongen_HK
dc.subject.meshHumansen_HK
dc.subject.meshMiddle Ageden_HK
dc.subject.meshPersonal Satisfactionen_HK
dc.subject.meshPhysician-Patient Relationsen_HK
dc.subject.meshQuestionnairesen_HK
dc.subject.meshReferral and Consultation - standardsen_HK
dc.subject.meshSickness Impact Profileen_HK
dc.titleThe Chinese medical interview satisfaction scale-revised (C-MISS-R): Development and validationen_HK
dc.typeArticleen_HK
dc.identifier.openurlhttp://library.hku.hk:4550/resserv?sid=HKU:IR&issn=0962-9343&volume=14&spage=1187&epage=1192&date=2005&atitle=The+Chinese+medical+interview+satisfaction+scale-revised+(C-MISS-R):+Development+and+validationen_HK
dc.identifier.emailLam, WWT:wwtlam@hku.hken_HK
dc.identifier.emailFielding, R:fielding@hku.hken_HK
dc.identifier.emailLeung, GM:gmleung@hku.hken_HK
dc.identifier.authorityLam, WWT=rp00443en_HK
dc.identifier.authorityFielding, R=rp00339en_HK
dc.identifier.authorityLeung, GM=rp00460en_HK
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s11136-004-2391-5en_HK
dc.identifier.pmid16041913en_HK
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-18844381383en_HK
dc.identifier.hkuros97945en_HK
dc.relation.referenceshttp://www.scopus.com/mlt/select.url?eid=2-s2.0-18844381383&selection=ref&src=s&origin=recordpageen_HK
dc.identifier.volume14en_HK
dc.identifier.issue4en_HK
dc.identifier.spage1187en_HK
dc.identifier.epage1192en_HK
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000228919600026-
dc.publisher.placeNetherlandsen_HK
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridLam, WWT=7203022022en_HK
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridFielding, R=7102200484en_HK
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridChow, L=7202532995en_HK
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridChan, M=7402597760en_HK
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridLeung, GM=7007159841en_HK
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridHo, EYY=7102724570en_HK
dc.identifier.citeulike197003-
dc.identifier.issnl0962-9343-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats