File Download
There are no files associated with this item.
Links for fulltext
(May Require Subscription)
- Publisher Website: 10.1111/j.1600-0536.1996.tb02261.x
- Scopus: eid_2-s2.0-0029779285
- PMID: 8896950
- WOS: WOS:A1996VK30200004
- Find via
Supplementary
- Citations:
- Appears in Collections:
Article: Patch testing of 490 patients in Hong Kong
Title | Patch testing of 490 patients in Hong Kong |
---|---|
Authors | |
Keywords | Chinese traditional medicine Contact dermatitis European standard allergens Fragrance mix Medicaments Patch testing |
Issue Date | 1996 |
Publisher | Blackwell Munksgaard. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journals/COD |
Citation | Contact Dermatitis, 1996, v. 35 n. 1, p. 23-26 How to Cite? |
Abstract | Patch testing, using European standard allergens and suspected causative substances brought in by patients, was carried out in 490 patients with eczema in Hong Kong and 437 completed the test. Before patch testing, 244, 141 and 105 patients were diagnosed as having contact dermatitis, endogenous eczema and unclassified eczema, respectively. After patch testing, the diagnosis of the causal agent was changed in 54 contact dermatitis patients, and 18% of endogenous eczema patients and 34% of unclassified eczema patients were re-diagnosed as contact dermatitis. In the patients with a final diagnosis of contact dermatitis, 19.5% were positive to fragrance mix, followed by nickel sulfate (16.4%) and cobalt chloride (11.3%). The commonest causative agents for contact dermatitis were soap or detergent (22.0%) and traditional Chinese medicine (17.3%); the latter was a more common cause of contact dermatitis than Western medicine (9.0%) or metals (13.4%). The prevalence of allergic reaction to fragrance in Hong Kong was higher than among Chinese in Beijing, Shanghai, Taipei or Singapore (78% ethnic Chinese). Dermatologists should have a high index of suspicion about traditional medications and should patch test with the suspected substance when patients give a history of use. |
Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/86733 |
ISSN | 2023 Impact Factor: 4.8 2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.681 |
ISI Accession Number ID | |
References |
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Lee, TY | en_HK |
dc.contributor.author | Lam, TH | en_HK |
dc.date.accessioned | 2010-09-06T09:20:39Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2010-09-06T09:20:39Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 1996 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.citation | Contact Dermatitis, 1996, v. 35 n. 1, p. 23-26 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.issn | 0105-1873 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/86733 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Patch testing, using European standard allergens and suspected causative substances brought in by patients, was carried out in 490 patients with eczema in Hong Kong and 437 completed the test. Before patch testing, 244, 141 and 105 patients were diagnosed as having contact dermatitis, endogenous eczema and unclassified eczema, respectively. After patch testing, the diagnosis of the causal agent was changed in 54 contact dermatitis patients, and 18% of endogenous eczema patients and 34% of unclassified eczema patients were re-diagnosed as contact dermatitis. In the patients with a final diagnosis of contact dermatitis, 19.5% were positive to fragrance mix, followed by nickel sulfate (16.4%) and cobalt chloride (11.3%). The commonest causative agents for contact dermatitis were soap or detergent (22.0%) and traditional Chinese medicine (17.3%); the latter was a more common cause of contact dermatitis than Western medicine (9.0%) or metals (13.4%). The prevalence of allergic reaction to fragrance in Hong Kong was higher than among Chinese in Beijing, Shanghai, Taipei or Singapore (78% ethnic Chinese). Dermatologists should have a high index of suspicion about traditional medications and should patch test with the suspected substance when patients give a history of use. | en_HK |
dc.language | eng | en_HK |
dc.publisher | Blackwell Munksgaard. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journals/COD | en_HK |
dc.relation.ispartof | Contact Dermatitis | en_HK |
dc.subject | Chinese traditional medicine | - |
dc.subject | Contact dermatitis | - |
dc.subject | European standard allergens | - |
dc.subject | Fragrance mix | - |
dc.subject | Medicaments | - |
dc.subject | Patch testing | - |
dc.subject.mesh | Dermatitis, Allergic Contact - diagnosis - epidemiology | en_HK |
dc.subject.mesh | Diagnosis, Differential | en_HK |
dc.subject.mesh | Eczema - diagnosis - epidemiology | en_HK |
dc.subject.mesh | Hong Kong - epidemiology | en_HK |
dc.subject.mesh | Humans | en_HK |
dc.subject.mesh | Medicine, Chinese Traditional | en_HK |
dc.subject.mesh | Patch Tests - methods | en_HK |
dc.subject.mesh | Perfume - adverse effects | en_HK |
dc.title | Patch testing of 490 patients in Hong Kong | en_HK |
dc.type | Article | en_HK |
dc.identifier.openurl | http://library.hku.hk:4550/resserv?sid=HKU:IR&issn=0105-1873&volume=35&spage=23&epage=26&date=1996&atitle=Patch+testing+of+490+patients+in+Hong+Kong | en_HK |
dc.identifier.email | Lam, TH:hrmrlth@hkucc.hku.hk | en_HK |
dc.identifier.authority | Lam, TH=rp00326 | en_HK |
dc.description.nature | link_to_subscribed_fulltext | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1111/j.1600-0536.1996.tb02261.x | - |
dc.identifier.pmid | 8896950 | - |
dc.identifier.scopus | eid_2-s2.0-0029779285 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.hkuros | 21279 | en_HK |
dc.relation.references | http://www.scopus.com/mlt/select.url?eid=2-s2.0-0029779285&selection=ref&src=s&origin=recordpage | en_HK |
dc.identifier.volume | 35 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.issue | 1 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.spage | 23 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.epage | 26 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.isi | WOS:A1996VK30200004 | - |
dc.publisher.place | Denmark | en_HK |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Lee, TY=16072414300 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Lam, TH=7202522876 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.issnl | 0105-1873 | - |