File Download
There are no files associated with this item.
Links for fulltext
(May Require Subscription)
- Publisher Website: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2001.tb01151.x
- Scopus: eid_2-s2.0-0034843739
- PMID: 11535483
- WOS: WOS:000170841200007
- Find via
Supplementary
- Citations:
- Appears in Collections:
Article: Using conjoint analysis to assess patients' preferences when visiting emergency departments in Hong Kong
Title | Using conjoint analysis to assess patients' preferences when visiting emergency departments in Hong Kong |
---|---|
Authors | |
Keywords | Conjoint analysis Health services management Hong Kong Patient preferences |
Issue Date | 2001 |
Publisher | Hanley & Belfus, Inc. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.elsevier.com/locate/aem |
Citation | Academic Emergency Medicine, 2001, v. 8 n. 9, p. 894-898 How to Cite? |
Abstract | Objectives: To explore factors related to emergency department (ED) attendances in Hong Kong, the authors piloted the application of conjoint analysis in eliciting patient preferences regarding ED visits. Methods: The study recruited 390 semi-urgent or non-urgent patients from a targeted convenience sample of three large EDs. Respondents were asked to rank eight scenarios structured to explore the relative importances of three key attributes - self-perceived illness severity, waiting time, and consultation fee - that may result in an ED visit. Results: Seventy-eight percent of the respondents would consider visiting a parallel clinic instead of the ED for semi-urgent and non-urgent conditions. The relative importances attached to illness severity, waiting time, and consultation fee were 47.8%, 33.6%, and 18.7%, respectively. Conclusions: This study demonstrated that Hong Kong patients are receptive to the concept of parallel clinics, and illustrated that conjoint analysis is a rigorous survey technique for eliciting the views of patients on health care services in the ED setting. |
Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/86549 |
ISSN | 2023 Impact Factor: 3.4 2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.279 |
ISI Accession Number ID | |
References |
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Leung, GM | en_HK |
dc.contributor.author | Chan, SSC | en_HK |
dc.contributor.author | Chau, PYK | en_HK |
dc.contributor.author | Chua, SC | en_HK |
dc.date.accessioned | 2010-09-06T09:18:24Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2010-09-06T09:18:24Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2001 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.citation | Academic Emergency Medicine, 2001, v. 8 n. 9, p. 894-898 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.issn | 1069-6563 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/86549 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Objectives: To explore factors related to emergency department (ED) attendances in Hong Kong, the authors piloted the application of conjoint analysis in eliciting patient preferences regarding ED visits. Methods: The study recruited 390 semi-urgent or non-urgent patients from a targeted convenience sample of three large EDs. Respondents were asked to rank eight scenarios structured to explore the relative importances of three key attributes - self-perceived illness severity, waiting time, and consultation fee - that may result in an ED visit. Results: Seventy-eight percent of the respondents would consider visiting a parallel clinic instead of the ED for semi-urgent and non-urgent conditions. The relative importances attached to illness severity, waiting time, and consultation fee were 47.8%, 33.6%, and 18.7%, respectively. Conclusions: This study demonstrated that Hong Kong patients are receptive to the concept of parallel clinics, and illustrated that conjoint analysis is a rigorous survey technique for eliciting the views of patients on health care services in the ED setting. | en_HK |
dc.language | eng | en_HK |
dc.publisher | Hanley & Belfus, Inc. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.elsevier.com/locate/aem | en_HK |
dc.relation.ispartof | Academic Emergency Medicine | en_HK |
dc.subject | Conjoint analysis | - |
dc.subject | Health services management | - |
dc.subject | Hong Kong | - |
dc.subject | Patient preferences | - |
dc.subject.mesh | Adult | en_HK |
dc.subject.mesh | Analysis of Variance | en_HK |
dc.subject.mesh | Attitude to Health | en_HK |
dc.subject.mesh | Emergency Service, Hospital | en_HK |
dc.subject.mesh | Female | en_HK |
dc.subject.mesh | Hong Kong | en_HK |
dc.subject.mesh | Humans | en_HK |
dc.subject.mesh | Income | en_HK |
dc.subject.mesh | Insurance, Health | en_HK |
dc.subject.mesh | Male | en_HK |
dc.subject.mesh | Middle Aged | en_HK |
dc.subject.mesh | Patient Satisfaction | en_HK |
dc.subject.mesh | Questionnaires | en_HK |
dc.subject.mesh | Time Factors | en_HK |
dc.title | Using conjoint analysis to assess patients' preferences when visiting emergency departments in Hong Kong | en_HK |
dc.type | Article | en_HK |
dc.identifier.openurl | http://library.hku.hk:4550/resserv?sid=HKU:IR&issn=1069-6563&volume=8&spage=894&epage=898&date=2001&atitle=Using+conjoint+analysis+to+assess+patients%27+preferences+when+visiting+emergency+departments+in+Hong+Kong | en_HK |
dc.identifier.email | Leung, GM:gmleung@hku.hk | en_HK |
dc.identifier.authority | Leung, GM=rp00460 | en_HK |
dc.description.nature | link_to_subscribed_fulltext | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2001.tb01151.x | - |
dc.identifier.pmid | 11535483 | - |
dc.identifier.scopus | eid_2-s2.0-0034843739 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.hkuros | 65227 | en_HK |
dc.relation.references | http://www.scopus.com/mlt/select.url?eid=2-s2.0-0034843739&selection=ref&src=s&origin=recordpage | en_HK |
dc.identifier.volume | 8 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.issue | 9 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.spage | 894 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.epage | 898 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.isi | WOS:000170841200007 | - |
dc.publisher.place | United States | en_HK |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Leung, GM=7007159841 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Chan, SSC=35733004000 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Chau, PYK=34876162600 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Chua, SC=13308130700 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.issnl | 1069-6563 | - |