File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Esteem maintenance among groups: Laboratory and field studies of group performance cognitions

TitleEsteem maintenance among groups: Laboratory and field studies of group performance cognitions
Authors
Issue Date2004
PublisherAcademic Press. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.elsevier.com/locate/obhdp
Citation
Organizational Behavior And Human Decision Processes, 2004, v. 94 n. 2, p. 86-101 How to Cite?
AbstractAcross 48 experimental groups, those that scored higher on group self-esteem attributed perceived positive outcomes to internal factors and negative outcomes to external factors. Groups provided more elaborate rationalizations about perceived negative outcomes and less elaborate rationalizations about perceived positive outcomes. They also espoused greater confidence in improved performance after negative outcomes and less confidence following positive outcomes. Similar findings were observed among 252 intact work groups in an employment setting. We discuss the implications of these findings for understanding how group self-esteem influences how groups evaluate and respond to performance feedback. © 2004 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/86046
ISSN
2015 Impact Factor: 2.805
2015 SCImago Journal Rankings: 2.564
ISI Accession Number ID
References

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorLam, SKen_HK
dc.contributor.authorSchaubroeck, Jen_HK
dc.contributor.authorBrown, ADen_HK
dc.date.accessioned2010-09-06T09:12:11Z-
dc.date.available2010-09-06T09:12:11Z-
dc.date.issued2004en_HK
dc.identifier.citationOrganizational Behavior And Human Decision Processes, 2004, v. 94 n. 2, p. 86-101en_HK
dc.identifier.issn0749-5978en_HK
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/86046-
dc.description.abstractAcross 48 experimental groups, those that scored higher on group self-esteem attributed perceived positive outcomes to internal factors and negative outcomes to external factors. Groups provided more elaborate rationalizations about perceived negative outcomes and less elaborate rationalizations about perceived positive outcomes. They also espoused greater confidence in improved performance after negative outcomes and less confidence following positive outcomes. Similar findings were observed among 252 intact work groups in an employment setting. We discuss the implications of these findings for understanding how group self-esteem influences how groups evaluate and respond to performance feedback. © 2004 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.en_HK
dc.languageengen_HK
dc.publisherAcademic Press. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.elsevier.com/locate/obhdpen_HK
dc.relation.ispartofOrganizational Behavior and Human Decision Processesen_HK
dc.titleEsteem maintenance among groups: Laboratory and field studies of group performance cognitionsen_HK
dc.typeArticleen_HK
dc.identifier.openurlhttp://library.hku.hk:4550/resserv?sid=HKU:IR&issn=0749-5978&volume=94&issue=2&spage=86&epage=101&date=2004&atitle=Esteem+Maintenance+Among+Groups:+Laboratory+and+Field+Studies+of+Group+Performance+Cognitionsen_HK
dc.identifier.emailLam, SK: simonlam@hku.hken_HK
dc.identifier.authorityLam, SK=rp01071en_HK
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.obhdp.2004.03.004en_HK
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-3042600553en_HK
dc.identifier.hkuros94179en_HK
dc.relation.referenceshttp://www.scopus.com/mlt/select.url?eid=2-s2.0-3042600553&selection=ref&src=s&origin=recordpageen_HK
dc.identifier.volume94en_HK
dc.identifier.issue2en_HK
dc.identifier.spage86en_HK
dc.identifier.epage101en_HK
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000222707900003-
dc.publisher.placeUnited Statesen_HK
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridLam, SK=35218940100en_HK
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridSchaubroeck, J=7003293292en_HK
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridBrown, AD=7408341995en_HK

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats