File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Improving group decisions by better pooling information: A comparative advantage of group decision support systems

TitleImproving group decisions by better pooling information: A comparative advantage of group decision support systems
Authors
Issue Date2000
PublisherAmerican Psychological Association. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.apa.org/journals/apl.html
Citation
Journal Of Applied Psychology, 2000, v. 85 n. 4, p. 565-573 How to Cite?
AbstractThis study compared a group decision support system (GDSS) with face-to-face (FTF) group discussion on characteristics of information exchange and decision quality. Participants given conflicting information tended to share more of their unique data and engaged in more critical argumentation when using the GDSS than when meeting FTF. Conversely, when information was consistent among members, there were no such differences between FTF and GDSS groups. The GDSS groups significantly outperformed the FTF groups in agreeing on the superior hidden profile candidate, especially when there was a lack of prediscussion consensus. Individual-level analyses revealed that members of GDSS. groups that did not have a prediscussion consensus tended to experience stronger preference shifts toward the group's consensus decision.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/85757
ISSN
2015 Impact Factor: 3.81
2015 SCImago Journal Rankings: 4.641
ISI Accession Number ID
References

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorLam, SSKen_HK
dc.contributor.authorSchaubroeck, Jen_HK
dc.date.accessioned2010-09-06T09:08:54Z-
dc.date.available2010-09-06T09:08:54Z-
dc.date.issued2000en_HK
dc.identifier.citationJournal Of Applied Psychology, 2000, v. 85 n. 4, p. 565-573en_HK
dc.identifier.issn0021-9010en_HK
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/85757-
dc.description.abstractThis study compared a group decision support system (GDSS) with face-to-face (FTF) group discussion on characteristics of information exchange and decision quality. Participants given conflicting information tended to share more of their unique data and engaged in more critical argumentation when using the GDSS than when meeting FTF. Conversely, when information was consistent among members, there were no such differences between FTF and GDSS groups. The GDSS groups significantly outperformed the FTF groups in agreeing on the superior hidden profile candidate, especially when there was a lack of prediscussion consensus. Individual-level analyses revealed that members of GDSS. groups that did not have a prediscussion consensus tended to experience stronger preference shifts toward the group's consensus decision.en_HK
dc.languageengen_HK
dc.publisherAmerican Psychological Association. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.apa.org/journals/apl.htmlen_HK
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Applied Psychologyen_HK
dc.rightsJournal of Applied Psychology. Copyright © American Psychological Association.en_HK
dc.titleImproving group decisions by better pooling information: A comparative advantage of group decision support systemsen_HK
dc.typeArticleen_HK
dc.identifier.openurlhttp://library.hku.hk:4550/resserv?sid=HKU:IR&issn=0021-9010&volume=85&issue=4&spage=565&epage=573&date=2000&atitle=Improving+Group+Decisions+by+Better+Pooling+Information:+A+Comparative+Advantage+of+Group+Decision+Supports+Systemsen_HK
dc.identifier.emailLam, SSK: simonlam@hku.hken_HK
dc.identifier.authorityLam, SSK=rp01071en_HK
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.pmid10948801en_HK
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-0034237984en_HK
dc.identifier.hkuros57796en_HK
dc.relation.referenceshttp://www.scopus.com/mlt/select.url?eid=2-s2.0-0034237984&selection=ref&src=s&origin=recordpageen_HK
dc.identifier.volume85en_HK
dc.identifier.issue4en_HK
dc.identifier.spage565en_HK
dc.identifier.epage573en_HK
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000088643000008-
dc.publisher.placeUnited Statesen_HK
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridLam, SSK=35218940100en_HK
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridSchaubroeck, J=7003293292en_HK

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats