File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Seasonal effects on transient evoked otoacoustic emission screening outcomes in infants versus 6-year-old children

TitleSeasonal effects on transient evoked otoacoustic emission screening outcomes in infants versus 6-year-old children
Authors
KeywordsInfants
Schoolchildren
Screening outcomes
Seasonal effects
Transient evoked otoacoustic emission
Issue Date2002
PublisherAmerican Academy of Audiology.
Citation
Journal Of The American Academy Of Audiology, 2002, v. 13 n. 7, p. 392-399 How to Cite?
AbstractThe purpose of this study was to compare transient evoked otoacoustic emission (TEOAE) screening outcomes (pass/fail) across the seasons (spring, autumn, and winter) between infants and schoolchildren. A total of 526 infants (275 boys, 251 girls) with a mean age of 2.0 months (SD = 0.38 months) and 975 schoolchildren (513 boys, 462 girls) with a mean age of 6.2 years (SD = 0.36 years) were screened using the ILO Otodynamics Quickscreen program. The same TEOAE pass/fail criterion was applied to the two groups. The results indicated a significant difference in pass rates between infants (91.2% of 1052 ears) and schoolchildren (86.0% of 1950 ears). A seasonal effect was found only for schoolchildren, with a significantly lower pass rate in winter than in spring or autumn. There was no difference in pass rates between spring and autumn. Implications for the seasonal effect on TEOAE screening outcomes for infants and schoolchildren are discussed.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/85033
ISSN
2015 Impact Factor: 1.344
2015 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.069
References

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorKei, Jen_HK
dc.contributor.authorRobertson, Ken_HK
dc.contributor.authorDriscoll, Cen_HK
dc.contributor.authorSmyth, Ven_HK
dc.contributor.authorMcPherson, Ben_HK
dc.contributor.authorLatham, Sen_HK
dc.contributor.authorLoscher, Jen_HK
dc.date.accessioned2010-09-06T09:00:02Z-
dc.date.available2010-09-06T09:00:02Z-
dc.date.issued2002en_HK
dc.identifier.citationJournal Of The American Academy Of Audiology, 2002, v. 13 n. 7, p. 392-399en_HK
dc.identifier.issn1050-0545en_HK
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/85033-
dc.description.abstractThe purpose of this study was to compare transient evoked otoacoustic emission (TEOAE) screening outcomes (pass/fail) across the seasons (spring, autumn, and winter) between infants and schoolchildren. A total of 526 infants (275 boys, 251 girls) with a mean age of 2.0 months (SD = 0.38 months) and 975 schoolchildren (513 boys, 462 girls) with a mean age of 6.2 years (SD = 0.36 years) were screened using the ILO Otodynamics Quickscreen program. The same TEOAE pass/fail criterion was applied to the two groups. The results indicated a significant difference in pass rates between infants (91.2% of 1052 ears) and schoolchildren (86.0% of 1950 ears). A seasonal effect was found only for schoolchildren, with a significantly lower pass rate in winter than in spring or autumn. There was no difference in pass rates between spring and autumn. Implications for the seasonal effect on TEOAE screening outcomes for infants and schoolchildren are discussed.en_HK
dc.languageengen_HK
dc.publisherAmerican Academy of Audiology.en_HK
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of the American Academy of Audiologyen_HK
dc.subjectInfantsen_HK
dc.subjectSchoolchildrenen_HK
dc.subjectScreening outcomesen_HK
dc.subjectSeasonal effectsen_HK
dc.subjectTransient evoked otoacoustic emissionen_HK
dc.titleSeasonal effects on transient evoked otoacoustic emission screening outcomes in infants versus 6-year-old childrenen_HK
dc.typeArticleen_HK
dc.identifier.openurlhttp://library.hku.hk:4550/resserv?sid=HKU:IR&issn=1050-0545&volume=13&spage=392&epage=399&date=2002&atitle=Seasonal+Effects+on+Transient+Evoked+Otoacoustic+Emission+Screening+Outcomes+in+Infants+Versus+6-year-Old+Childrenen_HK
dc.identifier.emailMcPherson, B: dbmcpher@hkucc.hku.hken_HK
dc.identifier.authorityMcPherson, B=rp00937en_HK
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.pmid12199515-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-0036630348en_HK
dc.identifier.hkuros76982en_HK
dc.relation.referenceshttp://www.scopus.com/mlt/select.url?eid=2-s2.0-0036630348&selection=ref&src=s&origin=recordpageen_HK
dc.identifier.volume13en_HK
dc.identifier.issue7en_HK
dc.identifier.spage392en_HK
dc.identifier.epage399en_HK
dc.publisher.placeUnited Statesen_HK
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridKei, J=7003334206en_HK
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridRobertson, K=36932528000en_HK
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridDriscoll, C=7202046484en_HK
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridSmyth, V=7003542460en_HK
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridMcPherson, B=7006800770en_HK
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridLatham, S=7006689337en_HK
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridLoscher, J=6603489225en_HK

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats