File Download
There are no files associated with this item.
Links for fulltext
(May Require Subscription)
- Publisher Website: 10.1586/14737167.7.5.479
- Scopus: eid_2-s2.0-36249009922
- Find via

Supplementary
-
Citations:
- Scopus: 0
- Appears in Collections:
Article: Outcome of laparoscopic surgery in colorectal cancer: A critical appraisal
| Title | Outcome of laparoscopic surgery in colorectal cancer: A critical appraisal |
|---|---|
| Authors | |
| Keywords | Colectomy Colorectal cancer Laparoscopy |
| Issue Date | 2007 |
| Publisher | Expert Reviews Ltd. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.future-drugs.com/publication.asp?publicationid=5 |
| Citation | Expert Review Of Pharmacoeconomics And Outcomes Research, 2007, v. 7 n. 5, p. 479-489 How to Cite? |
| Abstract | Despite the wide application of laparoscopic surgery for various common surgical conditions, the development of laparoscopic colorectal surgery has been slow. The obstacle for its advancement is formed by a steep learning curve and concerns about the oncologic safety in cases of malignant diseases. With refinement in instrumentation and Improvement in surgical techniques in recent years, laparoscopic colectomy has become a safe and feasible procedure. The short-term advantages in terms of quicker recovery of bowel function, less postoperative pain and shorter hospital stay of laparoscopic colectomy over conventional treatment seem to be indisputable. Results from large prospective randomized trials revealed the oncologic outcome to be comparable between the two treatments..Furthermore, the incidence of port-site metastasis was shown to be similar between the two approaches. For rectal cancer, laparoscopic-assisted total mesorectal excision has been shown to be a safe and feasible procedure. The incidence of postoperative morbidity including anastomotic leakage appears to be comparable between the two treatments. However, the long-term outcome especially for local recurrence and overall survival remains uncertain. Prospective randomized study with long follow-up is required to elucidate this issue. © 2007 Future Drugs Ltd. |
| Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/83836 |
| ISSN | 2023 Impact Factor: 1.8 2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.671 |
| References |
| DC Field | Value | Language |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.author | Chan, ACY | en_HK |
| dc.contributor.author | Law, WL | en_HK |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2010-09-06T08:45:48Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2010-09-06T08:45:48Z | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2007 | en_HK |
| dc.identifier.citation | Expert Review Of Pharmacoeconomics And Outcomes Research, 2007, v. 7 n. 5, p. 479-489 | en_HK |
| dc.identifier.issn | 1473-7167 | en_HK |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/83836 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | Despite the wide application of laparoscopic surgery for various common surgical conditions, the development of laparoscopic colorectal surgery has been slow. The obstacle for its advancement is formed by a steep learning curve and concerns about the oncologic safety in cases of malignant diseases. With refinement in instrumentation and Improvement in surgical techniques in recent years, laparoscopic colectomy has become a safe and feasible procedure. The short-term advantages in terms of quicker recovery of bowel function, less postoperative pain and shorter hospital stay of laparoscopic colectomy over conventional treatment seem to be indisputable. Results from large prospective randomized trials revealed the oncologic outcome to be comparable between the two treatments..Furthermore, the incidence of port-site metastasis was shown to be similar between the two approaches. For rectal cancer, laparoscopic-assisted total mesorectal excision has been shown to be a safe and feasible procedure. The incidence of postoperative morbidity including anastomotic leakage appears to be comparable between the two treatments. However, the long-term outcome especially for local recurrence and overall survival remains uncertain. Prospective randomized study with long follow-up is required to elucidate this issue. © 2007 Future Drugs Ltd. | en_HK |
| dc.language | eng | en_HK |
| dc.publisher | Expert Reviews Ltd. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.future-drugs.com/publication.asp?publicationid=5 | en_HK |
| dc.relation.ispartof | Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research | en_HK |
| dc.subject | Colectomy | en_HK |
| dc.subject | Colorectal cancer | en_HK |
| dc.subject | Laparoscopy | en_HK |
| dc.title | Outcome of laparoscopic surgery in colorectal cancer: A critical appraisal | en_HK |
| dc.type | Article | en_HK |
| dc.identifier.openurl | http://library.hku.hk:4550/resserv?sid=HKU:IR&issn=1473-7167&volume=7&issue=5&spage=479&epage=489&date=2007&atitle=Outcome+of+laparoscopic+surgery+in+colorectal+cancer:+a+critical+appraisal | en_HK |
| dc.identifier.email | Chan, ACY: acchan@hku.hk | en_HK |
| dc.identifier.email | Law, WL: lawwl@hkucc.hku.hk | en_HK |
| dc.identifier.authority | Chan, ACY=rp00310 | en_HK |
| dc.identifier.authority | Law, WL=rp00436 | en_HK |
| dc.description.nature | link_to_subscribed_fulltext | - |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.1586/14737167.7.5.479 | en_HK |
| dc.identifier.scopus | eid_2-s2.0-36249009922 | en_HK |
| dc.identifier.hkuros | 152212 | en_HK |
| dc.relation.references | http://www.scopus.com/mlt/select.url?eid=2-s2.0-36249009922&selection=ref&src=s&origin=recordpage | en_HK |
| dc.identifier.volume | 7 | en_HK |
| dc.identifier.issue | 5 | en_HK |
| dc.identifier.spage | 479 | en_HK |
| dc.identifier.epage | 489 | en_HK |
| dc.publisher.place | United Kingdom | en_HK |
| dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Chan, ACY=15828849100 | en_HK |
| dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Law, WL=7103147867 | en_HK |
| dc.identifier.citeulike | 1806983 | - |
| dc.identifier.issnl | 1473-7167 | - |
