File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Urinary retention following endoscopic totally extraperitoneal inguinal hernioplasty

TitleUrinary retention following endoscopic totally extraperitoneal inguinal hernioplasty
Authors
KeywordsHernia
Inguinal hernia
Inguinal herniorrhaphy
Laparoscopy
Morbidity
Issue Date2002
PublisherSpringer New York LLC. The Journal's web site is located at http://link.springer-ny.com/link/service/journals/00464/
Citation
Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques, 2002, v. 16 n. 11, p. 1547-1550 How to Cite?
AbstractBackground: The impact of preperitoneal mesh after endoscopic totally extraperitoneal inguinal hernioplasty (TEP) on voiding function has not been previously examined. The objectives of the present study were to evaluate the incidence of and risk factors for urinary retention following TEP. Methods: Three hundred consecutive patients who underwent TEP between June 1999 and September 2001 were recruited. Patient records were reviewed retrospectively to identify those who developed postoperative urinary retention. For each case patient, five age-matched control patients were randomly selected. We then compared the clinical data for the case and control groups. A prospective study of uroflowmetry in patients who underwent bilateral TEP was conducted to evaluate the effect of preperitoneal mesh on voiding function. Results: The overall incidence of urinary retention following TEP was 4% (n = 12). Patients who developed urinary retention stayed in hospital for a significantly longer period than the control group. No significant association was found between the clinical data and postoperative urinary retention. Bilateral TEPs were not associated with significant deterioration in uroflowmetry. Conclusions: Urinary retention is a frequent morbidity after TEP and significantly prolongs the length of hospital stay. Preperitoneal Prolene mesh did not cause outflow obstruction or alter bladder contractility. No specific clinical factors were identified that might predict postoperative urinary retention, which was probably multifactorial in causation in our patient population.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/83107
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 2.4
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.120
ISI Accession Number ID
References

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorLau, Hen_HK
dc.contributor.authorPatil, NGen_HK
dc.contributor.authorYuen, WKen_HK
dc.contributor.authorLee, Fen_HK
dc.date.accessioned2010-09-06T08:37:05Z-
dc.date.available2010-09-06T08:37:05Z-
dc.date.issued2002en_HK
dc.identifier.citationSurgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques, 2002, v. 16 n. 11, p. 1547-1550en_HK
dc.identifier.issn0930-2794en_HK
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/83107-
dc.description.abstractBackground: The impact of preperitoneal mesh after endoscopic totally extraperitoneal inguinal hernioplasty (TEP) on voiding function has not been previously examined. The objectives of the present study were to evaluate the incidence of and risk factors for urinary retention following TEP. Methods: Three hundred consecutive patients who underwent TEP between June 1999 and September 2001 were recruited. Patient records were reviewed retrospectively to identify those who developed postoperative urinary retention. For each case patient, five age-matched control patients were randomly selected. We then compared the clinical data for the case and control groups. A prospective study of uroflowmetry in patients who underwent bilateral TEP was conducted to evaluate the effect of preperitoneal mesh on voiding function. Results: The overall incidence of urinary retention following TEP was 4% (n = 12). Patients who developed urinary retention stayed in hospital for a significantly longer period than the control group. No significant association was found between the clinical data and postoperative urinary retention. Bilateral TEPs were not associated with significant deterioration in uroflowmetry. Conclusions: Urinary retention is a frequent morbidity after TEP and significantly prolongs the length of hospital stay. Preperitoneal Prolene mesh did not cause outflow obstruction or alter bladder contractility. No specific clinical factors were identified that might predict postoperative urinary retention, which was probably multifactorial in causation in our patient population.en_HK
dc.languageengen_HK
dc.publisherSpringer New York LLC. The Journal's web site is located at http://link.springer-ny.com/link/service/journals/00464/en_HK
dc.relation.ispartofSurgical Endoscopy and Other Interventional Techniquesen_HK
dc.subjectHerniaen_HK
dc.subjectInguinal herniaen_HK
dc.subjectInguinal herniorrhaphyen_HK
dc.subjectLaparoscopyen_HK
dc.subjectMorbidityen_HK
dc.titleUrinary retention following endoscopic totally extraperitoneal inguinal hernioplastyen_HK
dc.typeArticleen_HK
dc.identifier.openurlhttp://library.hku.hk:4550/resserv?sid=HKU:IR&issn=0930-2794&volume=16&issue=11&spage=1547&epage=1550&date=2002&atitle=Urinary+retention+following+endoscopic+totally+extraperitoneal+inguinal+hernioplastyen_HK
dc.identifier.emailPatil, NG: ngpatil@hkucc.hku.hken_HK
dc.identifier.authorityPatil, NG=rp00388en_HK
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s00464-001-8292-6en_HK
dc.identifier.pmid12042905-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-0036829943en_HK
dc.identifier.hkuros76939en_HK
dc.relation.referenceshttp://www.scopus.com/mlt/select.url?eid=2-s2.0-0036829943&selection=ref&src=s&origin=recordpageen_HK
dc.identifier.volume16en_HK
dc.identifier.issue11en_HK
dc.identifier.spage1547en_HK
dc.identifier.epage1550en_HK
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000179050000009-
dc.publisher.placeUnited Statesen_HK
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridLau, H=7201497812en_HK
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridPatil, NG=7103152514en_HK
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridYuen, WK=7102761292en_HK
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridLee, F=7403111996en_HK
dc.identifier.issnl0930-2794-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats