File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: The effect of high-pass filtering on TEOAE in 2-month-old infants

TitleThe effect of high-pass filtering on TEOAE in 2-month-old infants
Authors
KeywordsFiltering
Infants
Screening
Transient evoked otoacoustic emissions (TEOAE)
Issue Date2001
PublisherWhurr Publishers Ltd.
Citation
British Journal Of Audiology, 2001, v. 35 n. 1, p. 67-75 How to Cite?
AbstractThe aim of the present study was to investigate the effect of high-pass filtering on TEOAE obtained from 2-month-old infants as a function of filter cut-off frequency, activity states and pass/fail status of infants. Two experiments were performed. In Experiment 1, 100 2-month-old infants (200 ears) in five activity states (asleep, awake but peaceful, sucking a pacifier, feeding, restless) were tested by use of TEOAE technology. Five different filter conditions were applied to the TEOAE responses post hoc. The filter conditions were set at 781 Hz (default setting), 1.0, 1.2, 1.4 and 1.6 kHz. Results from this experiment showed that TEOAE parameters, such as whole-wave reproducibility (WR) and signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) at 0.8 kHz and 1.6 kHz, changed as a function of the cut-off frequency. The findings suggest that the 1.6 kHz and 1.2 kHz filter conditions are optimal for WR and SNR pass/fail criteria, respectively. Although all infant recordings appeared to benefit from the filtering, infants in the noisy states seemed to benefit the most. In Experiment 2, the high-pass filtering technique was applied to 23 infants (35 ears) who apparently failed the TEOAE tests on initial screening but were subsequently awarded a pass status based on the results from a follow-up auditory brainstem response (ABR) assessment. The findings showed a significant decrease in noise contamination of the TEOAE with a corresponding significant increase in WR. With high-pass filtering at 1.6 kHz, 21/35 ears could be reclassified into the pass category.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/82555
ISSN
ISI Accession Number ID
References

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorKei, Jen_HK
dc.contributor.authorFlynn, Cen_HK
dc.contributor.authorMcPherson, Ben_HK
dc.contributor.authorSmyth, Ven_HK
dc.contributor.authorLatham, Sen_HK
dc.contributor.authorLoscher, Jen_HK
dc.date.accessioned2010-09-06T08:30:42Z-
dc.date.available2010-09-06T08:30:42Z-
dc.date.issued2001en_HK
dc.identifier.citationBritish Journal Of Audiology, 2001, v. 35 n. 1, p. 67-75en_HK
dc.identifier.issn0300-5364en_HK
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/82555-
dc.description.abstractThe aim of the present study was to investigate the effect of high-pass filtering on TEOAE obtained from 2-month-old infants as a function of filter cut-off frequency, activity states and pass/fail status of infants. Two experiments were performed. In Experiment 1, 100 2-month-old infants (200 ears) in five activity states (asleep, awake but peaceful, sucking a pacifier, feeding, restless) were tested by use of TEOAE technology. Five different filter conditions were applied to the TEOAE responses post hoc. The filter conditions were set at 781 Hz (default setting), 1.0, 1.2, 1.4 and 1.6 kHz. Results from this experiment showed that TEOAE parameters, such as whole-wave reproducibility (WR) and signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) at 0.8 kHz and 1.6 kHz, changed as a function of the cut-off frequency. The findings suggest that the 1.6 kHz and 1.2 kHz filter conditions are optimal for WR and SNR pass/fail criteria, respectively. Although all infant recordings appeared to benefit from the filtering, infants in the noisy states seemed to benefit the most. In Experiment 2, the high-pass filtering technique was applied to 23 infants (35 ears) who apparently failed the TEOAE tests on initial screening but were subsequently awarded a pass status based on the results from a follow-up auditory brainstem response (ABR) assessment. The findings showed a significant decrease in noise contamination of the TEOAE with a corresponding significant increase in WR. With high-pass filtering at 1.6 kHz, 21/35 ears could be reclassified into the pass category.en_HK
dc.languageengen_HK
dc.publisherWhurr Publishers Ltd.en_HK
dc.relation.ispartofBritish Journal of Audiologyen_HK
dc.subjectFilteringen_HK
dc.subjectInfantsen_HK
dc.subjectScreeningen_HK
dc.subjectTransient evoked otoacoustic emissions (TEOAE)en_HK
dc.titleThe effect of high-pass filtering on TEOAE in 2-month-old infantsen_HK
dc.typeArticleen_HK
dc.identifier.openurlhttp://library.hku.hk:4550/resserv?sid=HKU:IR&issn=0300-5364&volume=35&spage=67&epage=75&date=2001&atitle=The+effect+of+high-pass+filtering+on+TEOAE+in+2-month-old+infants.en_HK
dc.identifier.emailMcPherson, B: dbmcpher@hkucc.hku.hken_HK
dc.identifier.authorityMcPherson, B=rp00937en_HK
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/03005364.2001.11742733-
dc.identifier.pmid11314913-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-0035082130en_HK
dc.identifier.hkuros58627en_HK
dc.relation.referenceshttp://www.scopus.com/mlt/select.url?eid=2-s2.0-0035082130&selection=ref&src=s&origin=recordpageen_HK
dc.identifier.volume35en_HK
dc.identifier.issue1en_HK
dc.identifier.spage67en_HK
dc.identifier.epage75en_HK
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000167499000007-
dc.publisher.placeUnited Kingdomen_HK
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridKei, J=7003334206en_HK
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridFlynn, C=7102629126en_HK
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridMcPherson, B=7006800770en_HK
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridSmyth, V=7003542460en_HK
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridLatham, S=7006689337en_HK
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridLoscher, J=6603489225en_HK
dc.identifier.issnl0300-5364-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats