File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Randomised trial comparing an interactive multimedia decision aid with a leaflet and a video to give information about prenatal screening for Down syndrome

TitleRandomised trial comparing an interactive multimedia decision aid with a leaflet and a video to give information about prenatal screening for Down syndrome
Authors
KeywordsComputer
Down syndrome
Interactive program
Prenatal screening
Issue Date2004
PublisherJohn Wiley & Sons Ltd. The Journal's web site is located at http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/cgi-bin/jhome/2252
Citation
Prenatal Diagnosis, 2004, v. 24 n. 8, p. 613-618 How to Cite?
AbstractObjectives: (1)To compare an interactive multimedia decision aid (IMDA) with a leaflet and a video to give information about prenatal screening for Down syndrome and (2) to determine the women's acceptance of IMDA. Methods: Two hundred and one women were recruited from the prenatal clinic of a university teaching hospital and randomised into the intervention group (IMDA, video, and information leaflet) or the control group (video and information leaflet). Results: There were no significant differences in the initial decision for and the final uptake of the prenatal screening test between the control and intervention groups. The proportion of women who were undecided was less than 10% in both groups. Of the women in the intervention group, 86.6% and 78.9% agreed that IMDA was user-friendly and acceptable, respectively. Significantly more women aged <35 (88.1%) accepted IMDA than women aged >=35 (68.3%) (P = 0.030), but the logistic regression analysis did not confirm this finding after adjusting for other factors (computer knowledge and usage of computer). Conclusion: The use of IMDA did not affect the women's overall uptake rate of the prenatal screening test for Down syndrome. More women less than 35 years accepted IMDA probably because they used computer more frequently and had more computer knowledge. Copyright © 2004 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/81620
ISSN
2015 Impact Factor: 3.043
2015 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.450
ISI Accession Number ID
References

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorLeung, KYen_HK
dc.contributor.authorLee, CPen_HK
dc.contributor.authorChan, HYen_HK
dc.contributor.authorTang, MHYen_HK
dc.contributor.authorLam, YHen_HK
dc.contributor.authorLee, Aen_HK
dc.date.accessioned2010-09-06T08:19:59Z-
dc.date.available2010-09-06T08:19:59Z-
dc.date.issued2004en_HK
dc.identifier.citationPrenatal Diagnosis, 2004, v. 24 n. 8, p. 613-618en_HK
dc.identifier.issn0197-3851en_HK
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/81620-
dc.description.abstractObjectives: (1)To compare an interactive multimedia decision aid (IMDA) with a leaflet and a video to give information about prenatal screening for Down syndrome and (2) to determine the women's acceptance of IMDA. Methods: Two hundred and one women were recruited from the prenatal clinic of a university teaching hospital and randomised into the intervention group (IMDA, video, and information leaflet) or the control group (video and information leaflet). Results: There were no significant differences in the initial decision for and the final uptake of the prenatal screening test between the control and intervention groups. The proportion of women who were undecided was less than 10% in both groups. Of the women in the intervention group, 86.6% and 78.9% agreed that IMDA was user-friendly and acceptable, respectively. Significantly more women aged <35 (88.1%) accepted IMDA than women aged >=35 (68.3%) (P = 0.030), but the logistic regression analysis did not confirm this finding after adjusting for other factors (computer knowledge and usage of computer). Conclusion: The use of IMDA did not affect the women's overall uptake rate of the prenatal screening test for Down syndrome. More women less than 35 years accepted IMDA probably because they used computer more frequently and had more computer knowledge. Copyright © 2004 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.en_HK
dc.languageengen_HK
dc.publisherJohn Wiley & Sons Ltd. The Journal's web site is located at http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/cgi-bin/jhome/2252en_HK
dc.relation.ispartofPrenatal Diagnosisen_HK
dc.rightsPrenatal Diagnosis. Copyright © John Wiley & Sons Ltd.en_HK
dc.subjectComputeren_HK
dc.subjectDown syndromeen_HK
dc.subjectInteractive programen_HK
dc.subjectPrenatal screeningen_HK
dc.titleRandomised trial comparing an interactive multimedia decision aid with a leaflet and a video to give information about prenatal screening for Down syndromeen_HK
dc.typeArticleen_HK
dc.identifier.openurlhttp://library.hku.hk:4550/resserv?sid=HKU:IR&issn=0197-3851&volume=24&issue=8&spage=613&epage=618&date=2004&atitle=Randomised+trial+comparing+an+interactive+multimedia+decision+aid+with+a+leaflet+and+a+video+to+give+information+about+prenatal+screening+for+Down+syndromeen_HK
dc.identifier.emailTang, MHY: mhytang@hkucc.hku.hken_HK
dc.identifier.emailLee, A: amlee@hku.hken_HK
dc.identifier.authorityTang, MHY=rp01701en_HK
dc.identifier.authorityLee, A=rp00483en_HK
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/pd.927en_HK
dc.identifier.pmid15305348-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-4243178144en_HK
dc.identifier.hkuros96570en_HK
dc.identifier.hkuros242724-
dc.relation.referenceshttp://www.scopus.com/mlt/select.url?eid=2-s2.0-4243178144&selection=ref&src=s&origin=recordpageen_HK
dc.identifier.volume24en_HK
dc.identifier.issue8en_HK
dc.identifier.spage613en_HK
dc.identifier.epage618en_HK
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000223530300006-
dc.publisher.placeUnited Kingdomen_HK
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridLeung, KY=8247106900en_HK
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridLee, CP=7410149538en_HK
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridChan, HY=7403402562en_HK
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridTang, MHY=8943401300en_HK
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridLam, YH=7202563903en_HK
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridLee, A=7405629831en_HK

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats