File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Self-administered instrument to measure the patient's experience of recovery after first-episode psychosis: Development and validation of the Psychosis Recovery Inventory

TitleSelf-administered instrument to measure the patient's experience of recovery after first-episode psychosis: Development and validation of the Psychosis Recovery Inventory
Authors
KeywordsFirst-episode psychosis
Rating scale
Recovery
Relapse
Subjective
Issue Date2005
PublisherInforma Healthcare. The Journal's web site is located at http://informahealthcare.com/anp
Citation
Australian And New Zealand Journal Of Psychiatry, 2005, v. 39 n. 6, p. 493-499 How to Cite?
AbstractObjective: Patients who are recovering from a first-episode psychosis face specific and complex issues that are related to their illness and treatment experiences, such as the appraisal of the extent of their recovery and the risk of relapse. Currently, no instrument provides a comprehensive assessment of these related attitudes. A novel self-administered rating scale for the measurement of key perceptions during the recovery stage after a first-episode psychosis is presented. The Psychosis Recovery Inventory (PRI) is designed to specifically address a number of closely related issues that are faced by patients who are recovering from a first-episode psychosis. Method: The process of development of the PRI involved the generation of items from qualitative interviews, the construction and refinement of these items and a validation study. The longitudinal stability of the PRI items was assessed in a test-retest reliability study in which 20 patients completed the retest within 4 weeks. The internal consistency and convergent validity of the PRI were evaluated by a comparison of the PRI subscale scores and the Scale to Assess Unawareness of Mental Disorder and Drug Attitude Inventory scores in a sample of 48 first-episode psychosis patients. Results: The validation study shows that the PRI is an instrument with a good test-retest reliability, internal consistency and convergent validity. Conclusions: This pragmatic, low burden, self-administered scale can be applied in clinical and research settings to obtain reliable information on the attitudes of patients on a range of interrelated issues in the recovery stage that follows a first-episode psychosis.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/81491
ISSN
2015 Impact Factor: 3.536
2015 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.269
ISI Accession Number ID
References

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorChen, EYHen_HK
dc.contributor.authorTam, DKPen_HK
dc.contributor.authorWong, JWSen_HK
dc.contributor.authorLaw, CWen_HK
dc.contributor.authorChiu, CPYen_HK
dc.date.accessioned2010-09-06T08:18:24Z-
dc.date.available2010-09-06T08:18:24Z-
dc.date.issued2005en_HK
dc.identifier.citationAustralian And New Zealand Journal Of Psychiatry, 2005, v. 39 n. 6, p. 493-499en_HK
dc.identifier.issn0004-8674en_HK
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/81491-
dc.description.abstractObjective: Patients who are recovering from a first-episode psychosis face specific and complex issues that are related to their illness and treatment experiences, such as the appraisal of the extent of their recovery and the risk of relapse. Currently, no instrument provides a comprehensive assessment of these related attitudes. A novel self-administered rating scale for the measurement of key perceptions during the recovery stage after a first-episode psychosis is presented. The Psychosis Recovery Inventory (PRI) is designed to specifically address a number of closely related issues that are faced by patients who are recovering from a first-episode psychosis. Method: The process of development of the PRI involved the generation of items from qualitative interviews, the construction and refinement of these items and a validation study. The longitudinal stability of the PRI items was assessed in a test-retest reliability study in which 20 patients completed the retest within 4 weeks. The internal consistency and convergent validity of the PRI were evaluated by a comparison of the PRI subscale scores and the Scale to Assess Unawareness of Mental Disorder and Drug Attitude Inventory scores in a sample of 48 first-episode psychosis patients. Results: The validation study shows that the PRI is an instrument with a good test-retest reliability, internal consistency and convergent validity. Conclusions: This pragmatic, low burden, self-administered scale can be applied in clinical and research settings to obtain reliable information on the attitudes of patients on a range of interrelated issues in the recovery stage that follows a first-episode psychosis.en_HK
dc.languageengen_HK
dc.publisherInforma Healthcare. The Journal's web site is located at http://informahealthcare.com/anpen_HK
dc.relation.ispartofAustralian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatryen_HK
dc.subjectFirst-episode psychosisen_HK
dc.subjectRating scaleen_HK
dc.subjectRecoveryen_HK
dc.subjectRelapseen_HK
dc.subjectSubjectiveen_HK
dc.titleSelf-administered instrument to measure the patient's experience of recovery after first-episode psychosis: Development and validation of the Psychosis Recovery Inventoryen_HK
dc.typeArticleen_HK
dc.identifier.openurlhttp://library.hku.hk:4550/resserv?sid=HKU:IR&issn=0004-8674&volume=39&spage=493&epage=499&date=2005&atitle=Self-Administered+Instrument+to+Measure+the+Patient%27s+Experience+of+Recovery+After+First-episode+psychosis:+Development+and+Validation+of+the+Psychosis+Recovery+Inventoryen_HK
dc.identifier.emailChen, EYH: eyhchen@hku.hken_HK
dc.identifier.emailChiu, CPY: chiupyc@hku.hken_HK
dc.identifier.authorityChen, EYH=rp00392en_HK
dc.identifier.authorityChiu, CPY=rp00291en_HK
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/j.1440-1614.2005.01609.xen_HK
dc.identifier.pmid15943652-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-21644476400en_HK
dc.identifier.hkuros104186en_HK
dc.relation.referenceshttp://www.scopus.com/mlt/select.url?eid=2-s2.0-21644476400&selection=ref&src=s&origin=recordpageen_HK
dc.identifier.volume39en_HK
dc.identifier.issue6en_HK
dc.identifier.spage493en_HK
dc.identifier.epage499en_HK
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000229580100010-
dc.publisher.placeUnited Kingdomen_HK
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridChen, EYH=7402315729en_HK
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridTam, DKP=36927807600en_HK
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridWong, JWS=8287346000en_HK
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridLaw, CW=8627115600en_HK
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridChiu, CPY=8627115700en_HK
dc.identifier.citeulike220017-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats