File Download
There are no files associated with this item.
Links for fulltext
(May Require Subscription)
- Publisher Website: 10.1016/j.cgh.2006.04.019
- Scopus: eid_2-s2.0-33745610044
- PMID: 16797240
- WOS: WOS:000239202600012
- Find via
Supplementary
- Citations:
- Appears in Collections:
Article: Esomeprazole With Aspirin Versus Clopidogrel for Prevention of Recurrent Gastrointestinal Ulcer Complications
Title | Esomeprazole With Aspirin Versus Clopidogrel for Prevention of Recurrent Gastrointestinal Ulcer Complications |
---|---|
Authors | |
Issue Date | 2006 |
Publisher | WB Saunders Co. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.elsevier.com/locate/cgh |
Citation | Clinical Gastroenterology And Hepatology, 2006, v. 4 n. 7, p. 860-865 How to Cite? |
Abstract | Background & Aims: The role of clopidogrel in patients at risk for gastrointestinal complications is uncertain, although it has been recommended for patients who have gastrointestinal intolerance to aspirin. We tested the hypothesis that clopidogrel is as effective as esomeprazole and aspirin in preventing recurrences of ulcer complications. Methods: This was a prospective, double-blind, randomized, controlled study of 170 patients who developed ulcer bleeding after the use of low-dose aspirin between November 2002 and January 2005. After healing of ulcers and eradication of Helicobacter pylori, if present, patients were assigned randomly to treatment with esomeprazole 20 mg/day and aspirin 100 mg/day (n = 86) or clopidogrel 75 mg/day (n = 84) for 52 weeks. The primary end point was recurrent ulcer complications. Results: During a median follow-up period of 52 weeks, no patient in the esomeprazole group, as compared with 9 patients in the clopidogrel group, developed recurrent ulcer complications. The cumulative incidences of recurrent ulcer complications were 0% in patients receiving esomeprazole and aspirin and 13.6% in patients receiving clopidogrel (absolute difference, 13.6%; 95% confidence interval for the difference, 6.3-20.9; log-rank test, P = .0019). Conclusions: The combination of esomeprazole and aspirin is superior to clopidogrel in preventing ulcer complications in patients who have a past history of aspirin-related peptic ulcer bleeding. © 2006 American Gastroenterological Association. |
Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/76718 |
ISSN | 2023 Impact Factor: 11.6 2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 3.091 |
ISI Accession Number ID | |
References |
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Lai, K | en_HK |
dc.contributor.author | Chu, K | en_HK |
dc.contributor.author | Hui, W | en_HK |
dc.contributor.author | Wong, BC | en_HK |
dc.contributor.author | Hung, W | en_HK |
dc.contributor.author | Loo, C | en_HK |
dc.contributor.author | Hu, WH | en_HK |
dc.contributor.author | Chan, AO | en_HK |
dc.contributor.author | Kwok, K | en_HK |
dc.contributor.author | Fung, T | en_HK |
dc.contributor.author | Wong, J | en_HK |
dc.contributor.author | Lam, S | en_HK |
dc.date.accessioned | 2010-09-06T07:24:12Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2010-09-06T07:24:12Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2006 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.citation | Clinical Gastroenterology And Hepatology, 2006, v. 4 n. 7, p. 860-865 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.issn | 1542-3565 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/76718 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Background & Aims: The role of clopidogrel in patients at risk for gastrointestinal complications is uncertain, although it has been recommended for patients who have gastrointestinal intolerance to aspirin. We tested the hypothesis that clopidogrel is as effective as esomeprazole and aspirin in preventing recurrences of ulcer complications. Methods: This was a prospective, double-blind, randomized, controlled study of 170 patients who developed ulcer bleeding after the use of low-dose aspirin between November 2002 and January 2005. After healing of ulcers and eradication of Helicobacter pylori, if present, patients were assigned randomly to treatment with esomeprazole 20 mg/day and aspirin 100 mg/day (n = 86) or clopidogrel 75 mg/day (n = 84) for 52 weeks. The primary end point was recurrent ulcer complications. Results: During a median follow-up period of 52 weeks, no patient in the esomeprazole group, as compared with 9 patients in the clopidogrel group, developed recurrent ulcer complications. The cumulative incidences of recurrent ulcer complications were 0% in patients receiving esomeprazole and aspirin and 13.6% in patients receiving clopidogrel (absolute difference, 13.6%; 95% confidence interval for the difference, 6.3-20.9; log-rank test, P = .0019). Conclusions: The combination of esomeprazole and aspirin is superior to clopidogrel in preventing ulcer complications in patients who have a past history of aspirin-related peptic ulcer bleeding. © 2006 American Gastroenterological Association. | en_HK |
dc.language | eng | en_HK |
dc.publisher | WB Saunders Co. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.elsevier.com/locate/cgh | en_HK |
dc.relation.ispartof | Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology | en_HK |
dc.subject.mesh | Aged | en_HK |
dc.subject.mesh | Aged, 80 and over | en_HK |
dc.subject.mesh | Anti-Ulcer Agents - administration & dosage | en_HK |
dc.subject.mesh | Aspirin - administration & dosage | en_HK |
dc.subject.mesh | Cohort Studies | en_HK |
dc.subject.mesh | Double-Blind Method | en_HK |
dc.subject.mesh | Female | en_HK |
dc.subject.mesh | Humans | en_HK |
dc.subject.mesh | Male | en_HK |
dc.subject.mesh | Middle Aged | en_HK |
dc.subject.mesh | Omeprazole - administration & dosage | en_HK |
dc.subject.mesh | Peptic Ulcer Hemorrhage - etiology - prevention & control | en_HK |
dc.subject.mesh | Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors - administration & dosage | en_HK |
dc.subject.mesh | Recurrence - prevention & control | en_HK |
dc.subject.mesh | Stomach Ulcer - complications | en_HK |
dc.subject.mesh | Ticlopidine - administration & dosage - analogs & derivatives | en_HK |
dc.subject.mesh | Treatment Outcome | en_HK |
dc.title | Esomeprazole With Aspirin Versus Clopidogrel for Prevention of Recurrent Gastrointestinal Ulcer Complications | en_HK |
dc.type | Article | en_HK |
dc.identifier.openurl | http://library.hku.hk:4550/resserv?sid=HKU:IR&issn=1542-3565&volume=4&spage=860&epage=865&date=2006&atitle=Esomeprazole+with+aspirin+versus+clopidogrel+for+prevention+of+recurrent+gastrointestinal+ulcer+complications | en_HK |
dc.identifier.email | Chu, K: chukm@hkucc.hku.hk | en_HK |
dc.identifier.email | Wong, BC: bcywong@hku.hk | en_HK |
dc.identifier.email | Wong, J: jwong@hkucc.hku.hk | en_HK |
dc.identifier.authority | Chu, K=rp00435 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.authority | Wong, BC=rp00429 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.authority | Wong, J=rp00322 | en_HK |
dc.description.nature | link_to_subscribed_fulltext | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1016/j.cgh.2006.04.019 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.pmid | 16797240 | - |
dc.identifier.scopus | eid_2-s2.0-33745610044 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.hkuros | 117614 | en_HK |
dc.relation.references | http://www.scopus.com/mlt/select.url?eid=2-s2.0-33745610044&selection=ref&src=s&origin=recordpage | en_HK |
dc.identifier.volume | 4 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.issue | 7 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.spage | 860 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.epage | 865 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.isi | WOS:000239202600012 | - |
dc.publisher.place | United States | en_HK |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Lai, K=7402135595 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Chu, K=7402453538 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Hui, W=7103196477 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Wong, BC=7402023340 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Hung, W=26027012100 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Loo, C=7103026584 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Hu, WH=25932937100 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Chan, AO=7403167965 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Kwok, K=7102194177 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Fung, T=13612072400 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Wong, J=8049324500 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Lam, S=7402279800 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.issnl | 1542-3565 | - |