File Download
  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
  • Find via Find It@HKUL
Supplementary

Article: Recourse against Arbitral Awards: How Far Can a Court Go? Supportive and Supervisory Role of Hong Kong Courts as Lessons to Mainland China Arbitration

TitleRecourse against Arbitral Awards: How Far Can a Court Go? Supportive and Supervisory Role of Hong Kong Courts as Lessons to Mainland China Arbitration
Authors
Issue Date2005
PublisherOxford University Press. The Journal's web site is located at http://chinesejil.oxfordjournals.org/
Citation
Chinese Journal of International Law. 2005, v. 4 n. 2, p. 481-500 How to Cite?
AbstractThrough a comprehensive comparison of various circumstances of recourse against arbitral awards in both Hong Kong and Mainland China, this article attempts to explore the underlying reasons for different approaches in the two jurisdictions, which traces origins back to the legal system, judicial culture and arbitration environment. Since Hong Kong's experience in the court's supportive and supervisory role regarding arbitral awards is more advanced, it should be borrowed by the Mainland in any future potential reform. The article argues that the reform and modernization of national arbitration legislation, whether in Hong Kong or in Mainland China, demonstrates different translation phases of the UNCITRAL Model Law. Given the special relationship between the two jurisdictions, a perfect arbitration environment in China should be fostered by combined efforts of both sides.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/75033
ISSN
2015 Impact Factor: 1.186
2015 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.737
SSRN

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorGu, Wen_HK
dc.date.accessioned2010-09-06T07:07:07Z-
dc.date.available2010-09-06T07:07:07Z-
dc.date.issued2005en_HK
dc.identifier.citationChinese Journal of International Law. 2005, v. 4 n. 2, p. 481-500en_HK
dc.identifier.issn1540-1650en_HK
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/75033-
dc.description.abstractThrough a comprehensive comparison of various circumstances of recourse against arbitral awards in both Hong Kong and Mainland China, this article attempts to explore the underlying reasons for different approaches in the two jurisdictions, which traces origins back to the legal system, judicial culture and arbitration environment. Since Hong Kong's experience in the court's supportive and supervisory role regarding arbitral awards is more advanced, it should be borrowed by the Mainland in any future potential reform. The article argues that the reform and modernization of national arbitration legislation, whether in Hong Kong or in Mainland China, demonstrates different translation phases of the UNCITRAL Model Law. Given the special relationship between the two jurisdictions, a perfect arbitration environment in China should be fostered by combined efforts of both sides.-
dc.languageengen_HK
dc.publisherOxford University Press. The Journal's web site is located at http://chinesejil.oxfordjournals.org/en_HK
dc.relation.ispartofChinese Journal Of International Lawen_HK
dc.rightsChinese Journal Of International Law. Copyright © Oxford University Press.en_HK
dc.rightsCreative Commons: Attribution 3.0 Hong Kong License-
dc.titleRecourse against Arbitral Awards: How Far Can a Court Go? Supportive and Supervisory Role of Hong Kong Courts as Lessons to Mainland China Arbitrationen_HK
dc.typeArticleen_HK
dc.identifier.openurlhttp://library.hku.hk:4550/resserv?sid=HKU:IR&issn=1540-1650&volume=4&spage=481&epage=500&date=2005&atitle=Recourse+Against+Awards+In+Arbitration:+How+Far+Can+A+Court+Go?+Supportive+And+Supervisory+Role+Of+Hong+Kong+Courts,+Lessons+To+PRC+Arbitrationen_HK
dc.identifier.emailGu, W: guweixia@hku.hken_HK
dc.identifier.authorityGu, W=rp01249en_HK
dc.description.naturepostprint-
dc.identifier.hkuros139846en_HK
dc.identifier.ssrn2641321-
dc.identifier.hkulrp2015/027-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats