File Download
There are no files associated with this item.
Links for fulltext
(May Require Subscription)
- Publisher Website: 10.1016/S0924-0136(00)00679-8
- Scopus: eid_2-s2.0-0034316351
- WOS: WOS:000165670200045
- Find via
Supplementary
- Citations:
- Appears in Collections:
Article: Evaluation methodologies for technology selection
Title | Evaluation methodologies for technology selection |
---|---|
Authors | |
Issue Date | 2000 |
Publisher | Elsevier SA. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.elsevier.com/locate/jmatprotec |
Citation | Journal Of Materials Processing Technology, 2000, v. 107 n. 1-3, p. 330-337 How to Cite? |
Abstract | This paper presents a technology selection algorithm to quantify both tangible and intangible benefits in fuzzy environment. Specifically, it describes an application of the theory of fuzzy sets to hierarchical structural analysis and economic evaluations. From the analytical point of view, decision-makers are asked to express their opinions on comparative importance of various factors in linguistic terms rather than exact numerical values. These linguistic variable scales, such as 'very high', 'high', 'medium', 'low' and 'very low', are then converted into fuzzy numbers, since it becomes more meaningful to quantify a subjective measurement into a range rather than in an exact value. By aggregating the hierarchy, the preferential weight of each alternative technology is found, which is called fuzzy appropriate index. The fuzzy appropriate indices of different technologies are then ranked and preferential ranking orders of technologies are found. From the economic evaluation perspective, a fuzzy cash flow analysis is employed. Since conventional engineering economic analysis involves uncertainty about future cash flows where cash flows are defined as either crisp numbers or risky probability distributions, the results of analysis may obscure. To deal quantitatively with imprecision or uncertainty, cash flows are modeled as triangular fuzzy numbers which represent 'the most likely possible value', 'the most pessimistic value' and 'the most optimistic value'. By using this algorithm, the ambiguities involved in the assessment data can be effectively represented and processed to assure a more convincing and effective decision-making. |
Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/74379 |
ISSN | 2023 Impact Factor: 6.7 2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.579 |
ISI Accession Number ID | |
References |
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Chan, FTS | en_HK |
dc.contributor.author | Chan, MH | en_HK |
dc.contributor.author | Tang, NKH | en_HK |
dc.date.accessioned | 2010-09-06T07:00:45Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2010-09-06T07:00:45Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2000 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.citation | Journal Of Materials Processing Technology, 2000, v. 107 n. 1-3, p. 330-337 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.issn | 0924-0136 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/74379 | - |
dc.description.abstract | This paper presents a technology selection algorithm to quantify both tangible and intangible benefits in fuzzy environment. Specifically, it describes an application of the theory of fuzzy sets to hierarchical structural analysis and economic evaluations. From the analytical point of view, decision-makers are asked to express their opinions on comparative importance of various factors in linguistic terms rather than exact numerical values. These linguistic variable scales, such as 'very high', 'high', 'medium', 'low' and 'very low', are then converted into fuzzy numbers, since it becomes more meaningful to quantify a subjective measurement into a range rather than in an exact value. By aggregating the hierarchy, the preferential weight of each alternative technology is found, which is called fuzzy appropriate index. The fuzzy appropriate indices of different technologies are then ranked and preferential ranking orders of technologies are found. From the economic evaluation perspective, a fuzzy cash flow analysis is employed. Since conventional engineering economic analysis involves uncertainty about future cash flows where cash flows are defined as either crisp numbers or risky probability distributions, the results of analysis may obscure. To deal quantitatively with imprecision or uncertainty, cash flows are modeled as triangular fuzzy numbers which represent 'the most likely possible value', 'the most pessimistic value' and 'the most optimistic value'. By using this algorithm, the ambiguities involved in the assessment data can be effectively represented and processed to assure a more convincing and effective decision-making. | en_HK |
dc.language | eng | en_HK |
dc.publisher | Elsevier SA. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.elsevier.com/locate/jmatprotec | en_HK |
dc.relation.ispartof | Journal of Materials Processing Technology | en_HK |
dc.title | Evaluation methodologies for technology selection | en_HK |
dc.type | Article | en_HK |
dc.identifier.openurl | http://library.hku.hk:4550/resserv?sid=HKU:IR&issn=0924-0136&volume=107&issue=1-3&spage=330&epage=337&date=2000&atitle=Evaluation+methodologies+for+technology+selection | en_HK |
dc.identifier.email | Chan, FTS: ftschan@hkucc.hku.hk | en_HK |
dc.identifier.authority | Chan, FTS=rp00090 | en_HK |
dc.description.nature | link_to_subscribed_fulltext | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1016/S0924-0136(00)00679-8 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.scopus | eid_2-s2.0-0034316351 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.hkuros | 63044 | en_HK |
dc.relation.references | http://www.scopus.com/mlt/select.url?eid=2-s2.0-0034316351&selection=ref&src=s&origin=recordpage | en_HK |
dc.identifier.volume | 107 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.issue | 1-3 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.spage | 330 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.epage | 337 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.isi | WOS:000165670200045 | - |
dc.publisher.place | Switzerland | en_HK |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Chan, FTS=7202586517 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Chan, MH=36941296800 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Tang, NKH=7202344533 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.issnl | 0924-0136 | - |