File Download
There are no files associated with this item.
Links for fulltext
(May Require Subscription)
- Publisher Website: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2005)131:10(1087)
- Scopus: eid_2-s2.0-26644459238
- WOS: WOS:000232040400006
- Find via
Supplementary
- Citations:
- Appears in Collections:
Article: Relational selection for collaborative working arrangements
Title | Relational selection for collaborative working arrangements |
---|---|
Authors | |
Keywords | Construction management Contracts Hong Kong Partnerships Procurement Teamwork |
Issue Date | 2005 |
Publisher | American Society of Civil Engineers. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.pubs.asce.org/journals/co.html |
Citation | Journal Of Construction Engineering And Management, 2005, v. 131 n. 10, p. 1087-1098 How to Cite? |
Abstract | Procurement arrangements for collaborative working arrangements (CWAs) should arguably provide suitable protocols under which different project partners can interact effectively and maintain harmonious relationships and mobilize their collective efforts towards common project objectives. Technical abilities of different project partners for carrying out the works are important. Also critical are their "soft" or "relational" qualities to work jointly and synergistically in the project team. The aims of the reported study are to examine the importance of a single set of different factors for selecting consultants, contractors, subcontractors, suppliers, and clients for CWAs; and to assess the relative importance of various factors and strategies for building CWAs. Data were collected internationally from 17 countries through a questionnaire survey and statistical analyses were conducted. Results attribute varying degrees of importance to various factors for selecting different project partners and suggest an interrelated and consolidated selection approach in general, except for "selecting" clients. The study confirms that trust and business ethics related factors and strategies are more helpful for CWAs than some others. Outcomes of this study are expected to benefit both industry practitioners and researchers, in exploring, designing, and implementing suitable CWAs and selecting appropriate project partners. © ASCE. |
Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/71804 |
ISSN | 2023 Impact Factor: 4.1 2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.071 |
ISI Accession Number ID | |
References |
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Rahman, MM | en_HK |
dc.contributor.author | Kumaraswamy, MM | en_HK |
dc.date.accessioned | 2010-09-06T06:35:19Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2010-09-06T06:35:19Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2005 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.citation | Journal Of Construction Engineering And Management, 2005, v. 131 n. 10, p. 1087-1098 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.issn | 0733-9364 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/71804 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Procurement arrangements for collaborative working arrangements (CWAs) should arguably provide suitable protocols under which different project partners can interact effectively and maintain harmonious relationships and mobilize their collective efforts towards common project objectives. Technical abilities of different project partners for carrying out the works are important. Also critical are their "soft" or "relational" qualities to work jointly and synergistically in the project team. The aims of the reported study are to examine the importance of a single set of different factors for selecting consultants, contractors, subcontractors, suppliers, and clients for CWAs; and to assess the relative importance of various factors and strategies for building CWAs. Data were collected internationally from 17 countries through a questionnaire survey and statistical analyses were conducted. Results attribute varying degrees of importance to various factors for selecting different project partners and suggest an interrelated and consolidated selection approach in general, except for "selecting" clients. The study confirms that trust and business ethics related factors and strategies are more helpful for CWAs than some others. Outcomes of this study are expected to benefit both industry practitioners and researchers, in exploring, designing, and implementing suitable CWAs and selecting appropriate project partners. © ASCE. | en_HK |
dc.language | eng | en_HK |
dc.publisher | American Society of Civil Engineers. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.pubs.asce.org/journals/co.html | en_HK |
dc.relation.ispartof | Journal of Construction Engineering and Management | en_HK |
dc.rights | Journal of Construction Engineering and Management. Copyright © American Society of Civil Engineers. | en_HK |
dc.subject | Construction management | en_HK |
dc.subject | Contracts | en_HK |
dc.subject | Hong Kong | en_HK |
dc.subject | Partnerships | en_HK |
dc.subject | Procurement | en_HK |
dc.subject | Teamwork | en_HK |
dc.title | Relational selection for collaborative working arrangements | en_HK |
dc.type | Article | en_HK |
dc.identifier.openurl | http://library.hku.hk:4550/resserv?sid=HKU:IR&issn=0733-9364&volume=131&issue=10&spage=1087&epage=1098&date=2005&atitle=Relational+selection+for+collaborative+working+arrangements | en_HK |
dc.identifier.email | Kumaraswamy, MM:mohan@hkucc.hku.hk | en_HK |
dc.identifier.authority | Kumaraswamy, MM=rp00126 | en_HK |
dc.description.nature | link_to_subscribed_fulltext | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2005)131:10(1087) | en_HK |
dc.identifier.scopus | eid_2-s2.0-26644459238 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.hkuros | 123936 | en_HK |
dc.relation.references | http://www.scopus.com/mlt/select.url?eid=2-s2.0-26644459238&selection=ref&src=s&origin=recordpage | en_HK |
dc.identifier.volume | 131 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.issue | 10 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.spage | 1087 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.epage | 1098 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.isi | WOS:000232040400006 | - |
dc.publisher.place | United States | en_HK |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Rahman, MM=35570458800 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Kumaraswamy, MM=35566270600 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.issnl | 0733-9364 | - |