File Download
There are no files associated with this item.
Links for fulltext
(May Require Subscription)
- Publisher Website: 10.1016/S0032-9592(02)00161-9
- Scopus: eid_2-s2.0-0036842688
- WOS: WOS:000179665400022
- Find via
Supplementary
- Citations:
- Appears in Collections:
Article: Comparative performance of mesophilic and thermophilic acidogenic upflow reactors
Title | Comparative performance of mesophilic and thermophilic acidogenic upflow reactors |
---|---|
Authors | |
Keywords | Acidogenic Anaerobic Comparison Mesophilic Organic loading rate Synthetic wastewater Thermophilic |
Issue Date | 2002 |
Publisher | Elsevier Ltd. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.elsevier.com/locate/procbio |
Citation | Process Biochemistry, 2002, v. 38 n. 3, p. 447-454 How to Cite? |
Abstract | Two anaerobic acidogenic reactors, one mesophilic (37°C) and one thermophilic (55°C), were operated with a synthetic wastewater at a series of organic loading rates (OLRs). There was almost no difference between the two reactors for chemical oxygen demand (COD) reduction, and degree of acidification at any given OLRs. However, the thermophilic reactor had a higher substrate degradation rate, biogas production rate, and specific formation rate of aqueous products than the mesophilic reactor. The predominant acidogenic products in the two reactors were acetate, propionate, butyrate, and ethanol. The distribution of acidogenic aqueous products was significantly influenced by OLR, but not by temperature. Only 1.7-7.9% of the COD in wastewater was converted to hydrogen/methane for the mesophilic reactor, and 2.5-8.8% of the COD for the thermophilic reactor. © 2002 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved. |
Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/71763 |
ISSN | 2023 Impact Factor: 3.7 2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.701 |
ISI Accession Number ID | |
References |
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Yu, HQ | en_HK |
dc.contributor.author | Fang, HHP | en_HK |
dc.contributor.author | Gu, GW | en_HK |
dc.date.accessioned | 2010-09-06T06:34:57Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2010-09-06T06:34:57Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2002 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.citation | Process Biochemistry, 2002, v. 38 n. 3, p. 447-454 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.issn | 1359-5113 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/71763 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Two anaerobic acidogenic reactors, one mesophilic (37°C) and one thermophilic (55°C), were operated with a synthetic wastewater at a series of organic loading rates (OLRs). There was almost no difference between the two reactors for chemical oxygen demand (COD) reduction, and degree of acidification at any given OLRs. However, the thermophilic reactor had a higher substrate degradation rate, biogas production rate, and specific formation rate of aqueous products than the mesophilic reactor. The predominant acidogenic products in the two reactors were acetate, propionate, butyrate, and ethanol. The distribution of acidogenic aqueous products was significantly influenced by OLR, but not by temperature. Only 1.7-7.9% of the COD in wastewater was converted to hydrogen/methane for the mesophilic reactor, and 2.5-8.8% of the COD for the thermophilic reactor. © 2002 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved. | en_HK |
dc.language | eng | en_HK |
dc.publisher | Elsevier Ltd. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.elsevier.com/locate/procbio | en_HK |
dc.relation.ispartof | Process Biochemistry | en_HK |
dc.rights | Process Biochemistry. Copyright © Elsevier Ltd. | en_HK |
dc.subject | Acidogenic | en_HK |
dc.subject | Anaerobic | en_HK |
dc.subject | Comparison | en_HK |
dc.subject | Mesophilic | en_HK |
dc.subject | Organic loading rate | en_HK |
dc.subject | Synthetic wastewater | en_HK |
dc.subject | Thermophilic | en_HK |
dc.title | Comparative performance of mesophilic and thermophilic acidogenic upflow reactors | en_HK |
dc.type | Article | en_HK |
dc.identifier.openurl | http://library.hku.hk:4550/resserv?sid=HKU:IR&issn=1359-5113&volume=38&issue=3&spage=447&epage=454&date=2002&atitle=Comparative+performance+of+mesophilic+and+thermophilic+acidogenic+upflow+reactors | en_HK |
dc.identifier.email | Fang, HHP:hrechef@hkucc.hku.hk | en_HK |
dc.identifier.authority | Fang, HHP=rp00115 | en_HK |
dc.description.nature | link_to_subscribed_fulltext | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1016/S0032-9592(02)00161-9 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.scopus | eid_2-s2.0-0036842688 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.hkuros | 76003 | en_HK |
dc.relation.references | http://www.scopus.com/mlt/select.url?eid=2-s2.0-0036842688&selection=ref&src=s&origin=recordpage | en_HK |
dc.identifier.volume | 38 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.issue | 3 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.spage | 447 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.epage | 454 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.isi | WOS:000179665400022 | - |
dc.publisher.place | United Kingdom | en_HK |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Yu, HQ=13008678100 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Fang, HHP=7402542625 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Gu, GW=7203055962 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.issnl | 1359-5113 | - |