File Download
There are no files associated with this item.
Links for fulltext
(May Require Subscription)
- Publisher Website: 10.1080/01441640500115892
- Scopus: eid_2-s2.0-25444467448
- WOS: WOS:000231534700006
- Find via
Supplementary
- Citations:
- Appears in Collections:
Article: Road safety strategies: A comparative framework and case studies
Title | Road safety strategies: A comparative framework and case studies |
---|---|
Authors | |
Issue Date | 2005 |
Publisher | Routledge. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.tandf.co.uk/journals/titles/01441647.asp |
Citation | Transport Reviews, 2005, v. 25 n. 5, p. 613-639 How to Cite? |
Abstract | This paper proposes a nine-component analytical framework for developing, comparing, and evaluating road safety strategies. The nine components are: (1) vision; (2) objectives; (3) targets; (4) action plan; (5) evaluation and monitoring; (6) research and development; (7) quantitative modelling; (8) institutional framework; and (9) funding. While thefirstfour components are essential for the formulation of a road safety strategy, the remaining components are key to its successful implementation. To demonstrate the usefulness of this comparative framework, we examine the road safety strategies of six selected administrations: Australia, California, Great Britain, Japan, New Zealand, and Sweden. In these case studies, we extract and highlight good practices in the formulation and implementation of their road safety strategies. The proposed framework also provides a systematic approach for assessing road safety strategies in other administrations. The evaluation of the six case studies forms a benchmarking platform for the planning, formulation, and implementation of good practices for road safety strategies. © 2005 Taylor & Francis. |
Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/71290 |
ISSN | 2023 Impact Factor: 9.5 2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 3.016 |
ISI Accession Number ID | |
References |
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Loo, BPY | en_HK |
dc.contributor.author | Hung, WT | en_HK |
dc.contributor.author | Lo, HK | en_HK |
dc.contributor.author | Wong, SC | en_HK |
dc.date.accessioned | 2010-09-06T06:30:39Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2010-09-06T06:30:39Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2005 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.citation | Transport Reviews, 2005, v. 25 n. 5, p. 613-639 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.issn | 0144-1647 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/71290 | - |
dc.description.abstract | This paper proposes a nine-component analytical framework for developing, comparing, and evaluating road safety strategies. The nine components are: (1) vision; (2) objectives; (3) targets; (4) action plan; (5) evaluation and monitoring; (6) research and development; (7) quantitative modelling; (8) institutional framework; and (9) funding. While thefirstfour components are essential for the formulation of a road safety strategy, the remaining components are key to its successful implementation. To demonstrate the usefulness of this comparative framework, we examine the road safety strategies of six selected administrations: Australia, California, Great Britain, Japan, New Zealand, and Sweden. In these case studies, we extract and highlight good practices in the formulation and implementation of their road safety strategies. The proposed framework also provides a systematic approach for assessing road safety strategies in other administrations. The evaluation of the six case studies forms a benchmarking platform for the planning, formulation, and implementation of good practices for road safety strategies. © 2005 Taylor & Francis. | en_HK |
dc.language | eng | en_HK |
dc.publisher | Routledge. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.tandf.co.uk/journals/titles/01441647.asp | en_HK |
dc.relation.ispartof | Transport Reviews | en_HK |
dc.title | Road safety strategies: A comparative framework and case studies | en_HK |
dc.type | Article | en_HK |
dc.identifier.openurl | http://library.hku.hk:4550/resserv?sid=HKU:IR&issn=0144-1647&volume=25&spage=613&epage=639&date=2005&atitle=Road+safety+strategies:+A+comparative+framework+and+case+studies | en_HK |
dc.identifier.email | Loo, BPY:bpyloo@hku.hk | en_HK |
dc.identifier.email | Wong, SC:hhecwsc@hku.hk | en_HK |
dc.identifier.authority | Loo, BPY=rp00608 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.authority | Wong, SC=rp00191 | en_HK |
dc.description.nature | link_to_subscribed_fulltext | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1080/01441640500115892 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.scopus | eid_2-s2.0-25444467448 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.hkuros | 101134 | en_HK |
dc.relation.references | http://www.scopus.com/mlt/select.url?eid=2-s2.0-25444467448&selection=ref&src=s&origin=recordpage | en_HK |
dc.identifier.volume | 25 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.issue | 5 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.spage | 613 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.epage | 639 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.isi | WOS:000231534700006 | - |
dc.publisher.place | United Kingdom | en_HK |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Loo, BPY=7005145560 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Hung, WT=7201803618 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Lo, HK=36786895900 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Wong, SC=24323361400 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.issnl | 0144-1647 | - |