Conference Paper: Improved performance of OLEDs with ITO surface treatments

File Download Links for fulltext
(May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

  • Basic View
  • Metadata View
  • XML View
TitleImproved performance of OLEDs with ITO surface treatments
AuthorsLi, CN1 2
Kwong, CY2
Djurišić, AB2
Lai, PT2
Chui, PC2
Chan, WK2
Liu, SY1
KeywordsITO surface treatment
Organic light emitting diodes
Issue Date2005
PublisherElsevier S.A.. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.elsevier.com/locate/tsf
CitationThin Solid Films, 2005, v. 477 n. 1-2, p. 57-62 [How to Cite?]
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tsf.2004.08.111
AbstractIn this work, we performed systematic study of the influence of oxidative (ultraviolet (UV) ozone) and acid treatments and their combinations on the ITO parameters (work function, carrier concentration and mobility, surface roughness and morphology) and the performance of organic light emitting diodes (OLEDs) fabricated on ITO treated with different treatments. ITO substrates were characterized by Hall measurements, Seebeck coefficient measurements, and surface probe microscopy. After characterization of ITO, we deposited 100 nm (N,N′-di(naphthalene-1-yl)-N,N′-diphenyl-benzidine (NPB) film on the surface of ITO substrates treated with different treatments and characterized it with surface probe microscopy and Seebeck coefficient measurements. Then, OLEDs with structure ITO/NPB/rubrene/tris (8-hydroxyquinoline) aluminum (Alq 3)/LiF/Al were fabricated. The device performance was related to the ITO surface morphology and the ITO work function, while there was no obvious relationship to the ITO carrier concentration and mobility. From the treatments investigated here, it is not possible to distinguish whether relatively flat surface with isolated high spikes is sufficient on its own for good performance, or high work function value together with such surface morphology is required. The maximum luminous efficiency of 2.0 lm/W was obtained for ITO/NPB/rubrene/Alq 3/LiF/Al OLED with HCl followed by UV ozone treatment compared to 1.7 lm/W with UV ozone treatment only. © 2004 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
ISSN0040-6090
2011 Impact Factor: 1.89
2011 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.159
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tsf.2004.08.111
ReferencesReferences in Scopus
DC Field
Value
dc.contributor.authorLi, CN
dc.contributor.authorKwong, CY
dc.contributor.authorDjurišić, AB
dc.contributor.authorLai, PT
dc.contributor.authorChui, PC
dc.contributor.authorChan, WK
dc.contributor.authorLiu, SY
dc.date.accessioned2010-09-06T06:16:42Z
dc.date.available2010-09-06T06:16:42Z
dc.date.issued2005
dc.description.abstractIn this work, we performed systematic study of the influence of oxidative (ultraviolet (UV) ozone) and acid treatments and their combinations on the ITO parameters (work function, carrier concentration and mobility, surface roughness and morphology) and the performance of organic light emitting diodes (OLEDs) fabricated on ITO treated with different treatments. ITO substrates were characterized by Hall measurements, Seebeck coefficient measurements, and surface probe microscopy. After characterization of ITO, we deposited 100 nm (N,N′-di(naphthalene-1-yl)-N,N′-diphenyl-benzidine (NPB) film on the surface of ITO substrates treated with different treatments and characterized it with surface probe microscopy and Seebeck coefficient measurements. Then, OLEDs with structure ITO/NPB/rubrene/tris (8-hydroxyquinoline) aluminum (Alq 3)/LiF/Al were fabricated. The device performance was related to the ITO surface morphology and the ITO work function, while there was no obvious relationship to the ITO carrier concentration and mobility. From the treatments investigated here, it is not possible to distinguish whether relatively flat surface with isolated high spikes is sufficient on its own for good performance, or high work function value together with such surface morphology is required. The maximum luminous efficiency of 2.0 lm/W was obtained for ITO/NPB/rubrene/Alq 3/LiF/Al OLED with HCl followed by UV ozone treatment compared to 1.7 lm/W with UV ozone treatment only. © 2004 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
dc.description.natureLink_to_subscribed_fulltext
dc.identifier.citationThin Solid Films, 2005, v. 477 n. 1-2, p. 57-62 [How to Cite?]
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tsf.2004.08.111
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tsf.2004.08.111
dc.identifier.epage62
dc.identifier.hkuros97391
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000227825600012
dc.identifier.issn0040-6090
2011 Impact Factor: 1.89
2011 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.159
dc.identifier.issue1-2
dc.identifier.openurl
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-14644388214
dc.identifier.spage57
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/69773
dc.identifier.volume477
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherElsevier S.A.. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.elsevier.com/locate/tsf
dc.publisher.placeSwitzerland
dc.relation.ispartofThin Solid Films
dc.relation.referencesReferences in Scopus
dc.subjectITO surface treatment
dc.subjectOrganic light emitting diodes
dc.titleImproved performance of OLEDs with ITO surface treatments
dc.typeConference_Paper
Author Affiliations
  1. Jilin University
  2. The University of Hong Kong