File Download
There are no files associated with this item.
Links for fulltext
(May Require Subscription)
- Publisher Website: 10.1007/BF03013155
- Scopus: eid_2-s2.0-0030668940
- PMID: 9260007
- WOS: WOS:A1997XP89700004
- Find via
Supplementary
- Citations:
- Appears in Collections:
Article: Comparison of tramadol and tramadol/droperidol mixture for patient-controlled analgesia
Title | Comparison of tramadol and tramadol/droperidol mixture for patient-controlled analgesia |
---|---|
Authors | |
Issue Date | 1997 |
Publisher | Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.cja-jca.org/ |
Citation | Canadian Journal Of Anaesthesia, 1997, v. 44 n. 8, p. 810-815 How to Cite? |
Abstract | Purpose: To compare the analgesic efficacy and side effects of tramadol vs tramadol and droperidol for post-operative patient-controlled analgesia (PCA). Methods: Randomised, double-blind study. Thirty-four patients undergoing elective colorectal or head and neck surgery were allocated to Group I (n = 18, PCA bolus 10 mg tramadol) or Group 2 (n = 16, PCA bolus 10 mg tramadol + 0.1 mg droperidol). Anaesthesia was induced with fentanyl and thiopentone and maintained with O2, N2O plus enflurane or isoflurane with iv morphine at doses decided by the attending anaesthetists. Muscle relaxation was achieved with atracurium or vecuronium. Patients were observed four-hourly for pain using an II-point verbal rating scale (VRS). Nausea and vomiting, and sedation were assessed using four-point scales post-operatively. Vital signs, request for rescue anti-emetic and analgesic, and overall satisfaction were recorded. Results; The mean nausea scores were lower in Group 2 (1.00 ± 1.33 vs 0.06 ± 0.25 at 0-8 hr, 1.22 ± 1.93 vs 0.06 ± 0.25 at 8-16 hr, P < 0.01; 0.81 ± 1.68 vs 0 at 32-40 hr, P < 0.05; Group I vs Group 2). The vomiting scores were also lower (0.50 ± 1.04 vs 0 at 0-8 hr, 0.67 ± 1.50 vs 0 at 8-16 hr, P < 0.05; Group 1 vs Group 2). Seven (39%) patients in Group 1, but none in in Group 2, requested rescue anti-emetic (P < 0.01). There were no difference in VRS, sedation score, overall satisfaction or vital signs. Conclusion: Tramadol and droperidol combination is superior to tramadol alone for post-operative PCA. It provides a similar quality of analgesia with less nausea and vomiting and without an increase in sedation. |
Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/67272 |
ISSN | 2023 Impact Factor: 3.4 2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.924 |
ISI Accession Number ID | |
References |
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Ng, KFJ | en_HK |
dc.contributor.author | Tsui, SL | en_HK |
dc.contributor.author | Yang, JCS | en_HK |
dc.contributor.author | Ho, ETF | en_HK |
dc.date.accessioned | 2010-09-06T05:53:30Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2010-09-06T05:53:30Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 1997 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.citation | Canadian Journal Of Anaesthesia, 1997, v. 44 n. 8, p. 810-815 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.issn | 0832-610X | en_HK |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/67272 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Purpose: To compare the analgesic efficacy and side effects of tramadol vs tramadol and droperidol for post-operative patient-controlled analgesia (PCA). Methods: Randomised, double-blind study. Thirty-four patients undergoing elective colorectal or head and neck surgery were allocated to Group I (n = 18, PCA bolus 10 mg tramadol) or Group 2 (n = 16, PCA bolus 10 mg tramadol + 0.1 mg droperidol). Anaesthesia was induced with fentanyl and thiopentone and maintained with O2, N2O plus enflurane or isoflurane with iv morphine at doses decided by the attending anaesthetists. Muscle relaxation was achieved with atracurium or vecuronium. Patients were observed four-hourly for pain using an II-point verbal rating scale (VRS). Nausea and vomiting, and sedation were assessed using four-point scales post-operatively. Vital signs, request for rescue anti-emetic and analgesic, and overall satisfaction were recorded. Results; The mean nausea scores were lower in Group 2 (1.00 ± 1.33 vs 0.06 ± 0.25 at 0-8 hr, 1.22 ± 1.93 vs 0.06 ± 0.25 at 8-16 hr, P < 0.01; 0.81 ± 1.68 vs 0 at 32-40 hr, P < 0.05; Group I vs Group 2). The vomiting scores were also lower (0.50 ± 1.04 vs 0 at 0-8 hr, 0.67 ± 1.50 vs 0 at 8-16 hr, P < 0.05; Group 1 vs Group 2). Seven (39%) patients in Group 1, but none in in Group 2, requested rescue anti-emetic (P < 0.01). There were no difference in VRS, sedation score, overall satisfaction or vital signs. Conclusion: Tramadol and droperidol combination is superior to tramadol alone for post-operative PCA. It provides a similar quality of analgesia with less nausea and vomiting and without an increase in sedation. | en_HK |
dc.language | eng | en_HK |
dc.publisher | Canadian Anesthesiologists' Society. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.cja-jca.org/ | en_HK |
dc.relation.ispartof | Canadian Journal of Anaesthesia | en_HK |
dc.subject.mesh | Analgesia, Patient-Controlled | - |
dc.subject.mesh | Analgesics - therapeutic use | - |
dc.subject.mesh | Droperidol - administration and dosage - adverse effects - therapeutic use | - |
dc.subject.mesh | Tramadol - administration and dosage - adverse effects - therapeutic use | - |
dc.subject.mesh | Vomiting - chemically induced - prevention and control | - |
dc.title | Comparison of tramadol and tramadol/droperidol mixture for patient-controlled analgesia | en_HK |
dc.type | Article | en_HK |
dc.identifier.email | Ng, KFJ:jkfng@hkucc.hku.hk | en_HK |
dc.identifier.authority | Ng, KFJ=rp00544 | en_HK |
dc.description.nature | link_to_subscribed_fulltext | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1007/BF03013155 | - |
dc.identifier.pmid | 9260007 | - |
dc.identifier.scopus | eid_2-s2.0-0030668940 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.hkuros | 32570 | en_HK |
dc.relation.references | http://www.scopus.com/mlt/select.url?eid=2-s2.0-0030668940&selection=ref&src=s&origin=recordpage | en_HK |
dc.identifier.volume | 44 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.issue | 8 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.spage | 810 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.epage | 815 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.isi | WOS:A1997XP89700004 | - |
dc.publisher.place | Canada | en_HK |
dc.identifier.issnl | 0832-610X | - |