File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Bilateral sagittal split osteotomies versus mandibular distraction osteogenesis: which is better?

TitleBilateral sagittal split osteotomies versus mandibular distraction osteogenesis: which is better?
Authors
Issue Date2008
PublisherRoyal Australasian College of Dental Surgeons. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.racds.org
Citation
Annals Of The Royal Australasian College Of Dental Surgeons, 2008, v. 19, p. 55-57 How to Cite?
AbstractBilateral sagittal split osteotomies (BSSO) and mandibular distraction ostoegenesis (MDO) have both been applied in the surgical treatment of Class II mandibular hypoplasia. This randomized controlled trial aimed to compare the stability and morbidities of both techniques. From the preliminary data, skeletal relapse seems to be comparable between BSSO and MDO within the first post-operative six months. Objective and subjective neurosensory evaluation showed no significant difference in all mean scores for LT, 2PD and PPPT between both surgical techniques. Localized wound infection was a common post-operative complication for MDO. A greater sample size is required to ascertain which technique is better.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/67000
ISSN
2015 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.101

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorOw, ATen_HK
dc.contributor.authorCheung, LKen_HK
dc.date.accessioned2010-09-06T05:51:07Z-
dc.date.available2010-09-06T05:51:07Z-
dc.date.issued2008en_HK
dc.identifier.citationAnnals Of The Royal Australasian College Of Dental Surgeons, 2008, v. 19, p. 55-57en_HK
dc.identifier.issn0158-1570en_HK
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/67000-
dc.description.abstractBilateral sagittal split osteotomies (BSSO) and mandibular distraction ostoegenesis (MDO) have both been applied in the surgical treatment of Class II mandibular hypoplasia. This randomized controlled trial aimed to compare the stability and morbidities of both techniques. From the preliminary data, skeletal relapse seems to be comparable between BSSO and MDO within the first post-operative six months. Objective and subjective neurosensory evaluation showed no significant difference in all mean scores for LT, 2PD and PPPT between both surgical techniques. Localized wound infection was a common post-operative complication for MDO. A greater sample size is required to ascertain which technique is better.en_HK
dc.languageengen_HK
dc.publisherRoyal Australasian College of Dental Surgeons. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.racds.orgen_HK
dc.relation.ispartofAnnals of the Royal Australasian College of Dental Surgeonsen_HK
dc.subject.meshCephalometry-
dc.subject.meshMandible - abnormalities - surgery-
dc.subject.meshMandibular Advancement/methods-
dc.subject.meshOsteogenesis, Distraction - methods-
dc.subject.meshOsteotomy - methods-
dc.titleBilateral sagittal split osteotomies versus mandibular distraction osteogenesis: which is better?en_HK
dc.typeArticleen_HK
dc.identifier.openurlhttp://library.hku.hk:4550/resserv?sid=HKU:IR&issn=0158-1570&volume=19&spage=55&epage=57&date=2008&atitle=Bilateral+sagittal+split+osteotomies+versus+mandibular+distraction+osteogenesis:+which+is+better?en_HK
dc.identifier.emailCheung, LK:lkcheung@hkucc.hku.hken_HK
dc.identifier.authorityCheung, LK=rp00013en_HK
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.pmid19728632-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-70349781111en_HK
dc.identifier.hkuros169500en_HK
dc.identifier.volume19en_HK
dc.identifier.spage55en_HK
dc.identifier.epage57en_HK
dc.publisher.placeAustraliaen_HK
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridOw, AT=23973480300en_HK
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridCheung, LK=7102302747en_HK

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats