File Download
There are no files associated with this item.
Links for fulltext
(May Require Subscription)
- Publisher Website: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01870.x
- Scopus: eid_2-s2.0-72949085306
- PMID: 20070745
- WOS: WOS:000272835900005
- Find via
Supplementary
- Citations:
- Appears in Collections:
Article: Analysis of the socket bone wall dimensions in the upper maxilla in relation to immediate implant placement
Title | Analysis of the socket bone wall dimensions in the upper maxilla in relation to immediate implant placement |
---|---|
Authors | |
Keywords | Bone Defect Dental implant Extraction socket Resorption Width |
Issue Date | 2010 |
Publisher | Wiley-Blackwell Publishing, Inc.. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journals/CLR |
Citation | Clinical Oral Implants Research, 2010, v. 21 n. 1, p. 37-42 How to Cite? |
Abstract | Background: Animal and human researches have shown that immediate implant placement into extraction sockets failed to prevent socket dimensional changes following tooth extraction. It has been suggested that a minimal width of 1-2 mm of buccal bone is necessary to maintain a stable vertical dimension of the alveolar crest. Aim: To determine the dimensions of the bony wall at extraction sites in the esthetic zone (anterior teeth and premolars in the maxilla) and relate it to immediate implant placement. Methods: As part of an ongoing prospective randomized-controlled multicenter clinical study on immediate implant placement, the width of the buccal and palatal bony walls was recorded at 93 extraction sites. Results: The mean width of the buccal and palatal bony walls was 1 and 1.2 mm, respectively (P<0.05). For the anterior sites (canine to canine), the mean width of the buccal bony wall was 0.8 mm. For the posterior (premolar) sites, it was 1.1 mm (P<0.05). In the anterior sites, 87% of the buccal bony walls had a width ≤1 mm and 3% of the walls were 2 mm wide. In the posterior sites, the corresponding values were 59% and 9%, respectively. Conclusions: If the criterion of a minimal buccal bone width of 2 mm to maintain a stable buccal bony wall is valid, only a limited number of sites in the anterior maxilla display such a clinical situation. The data suggested that in the majority of extraction sites in the anterior maxilla, thin (≤1 mm) buccal walls were present. This, in turn, means that in most clinical situations encountered, augmentation procedures are needed to achieve adequate bony contours around the implant. © 2009 John Wiley & Sons A/S. |
Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/66941 |
ISSN | 2023 Impact Factor: 4.8 2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.865 |
ISI Accession Number ID | |
References |
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | HuynhBa, G | en_HK |
dc.contributor.author | Pjetursson, BE | en_HK |
dc.contributor.author | Sanz, M | en_HK |
dc.contributor.author | Cecchinato, D | en_HK |
dc.contributor.author | Ferrus, J | en_HK |
dc.contributor.author | Lindhe, J | en_HK |
dc.contributor.author | Lang, NP | en_HK |
dc.date.accessioned | 2010-09-06T05:50:38Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2010-09-06T05:50:38Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2010 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.citation | Clinical Oral Implants Research, 2010, v. 21 n. 1, p. 37-42 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.issn | 0905-7161 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/66941 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Background: Animal and human researches have shown that immediate implant placement into extraction sockets failed to prevent socket dimensional changes following tooth extraction. It has been suggested that a minimal width of 1-2 mm of buccal bone is necessary to maintain a stable vertical dimension of the alveolar crest. Aim: To determine the dimensions of the bony wall at extraction sites in the esthetic zone (anterior teeth and premolars in the maxilla) and relate it to immediate implant placement. Methods: As part of an ongoing prospective randomized-controlled multicenter clinical study on immediate implant placement, the width of the buccal and palatal bony walls was recorded at 93 extraction sites. Results: The mean width of the buccal and palatal bony walls was 1 and 1.2 mm, respectively (P<0.05). For the anterior sites (canine to canine), the mean width of the buccal bony wall was 0.8 mm. For the posterior (premolar) sites, it was 1.1 mm (P<0.05). In the anterior sites, 87% of the buccal bony walls had a width ≤1 mm and 3% of the walls were 2 mm wide. In the posterior sites, the corresponding values were 59% and 9%, respectively. Conclusions: If the criterion of a minimal buccal bone width of 2 mm to maintain a stable buccal bony wall is valid, only a limited number of sites in the anterior maxilla display such a clinical situation. The data suggested that in the majority of extraction sites in the anterior maxilla, thin (≤1 mm) buccal walls were present. This, in turn, means that in most clinical situations encountered, augmentation procedures are needed to achieve adequate bony contours around the implant. © 2009 John Wiley & Sons A/S. | en_HK |
dc.language | eng | en_HK |
dc.publisher | Wiley-Blackwell Publishing, Inc.. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journals/CLR | en_HK |
dc.relation.ispartof | Clinical Oral Implants Research | en_HK |
dc.subject | Bone | - |
dc.subject | Defect | - |
dc.subject | Dental implant | - |
dc.subject | Extraction socket | - |
dc.subject | Resorption | - |
dc.subject | Width | - |
dc.subject.mesh | Adult | en_HK |
dc.subject.mesh | Aged | en_HK |
dc.subject.mesh | Aged, 80 and over | en_HK |
dc.subject.mesh | Alveolar Process - anatomy & histology - surgery | en_HK |
dc.subject.mesh | Dental Implantation, Endosseous - methods | en_HK |
dc.subject.mesh | Dental Implants, Single-Tooth | en_HK |
dc.subject.mesh | Female | en_HK |
dc.subject.mesh | Humans | en_HK |
dc.subject.mesh | Male | en_HK |
dc.subject.mesh | Maxilla - anatomy & histology - surgery | en_HK |
dc.subject.mesh | Middle Aged | en_HK |
dc.subject.mesh | Prospective Studies | en_HK |
dc.subject.mesh | Tooth Socket - anatomy & histology - surgery | en_HK |
dc.subject.mesh | Treatment Outcome | en_HK |
dc.title | Analysis of the socket bone wall dimensions in the upper maxilla in relation to immediate implant placement | en_HK |
dc.type | Article | en_HK |
dc.identifier.openurl | http://library.hku.hk:4550/resserv?sid=HKU:IR&issn=0905-7161&volume=21&spage=37&epage=42&date=2010&atitle=Analysis+of+the+socket+bone+wall+dimensions+in+the+upper+maxilla+in+relation+to+immediate+implant+placement | en_HK |
dc.identifier.email | Lang, NP:nplang@hkucc.hku.hk | en_HK |
dc.identifier.authority | Lang, NP=rp00031 | en_HK |
dc.description.nature | link_to_subscribed_fulltext | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01870.x | en_HK |
dc.identifier.pmid | 20070745 | - |
dc.identifier.scopus | eid_2-s2.0-72949085306 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.hkuros | 169093 | en_HK |
dc.relation.references | http://www.scopus.com/mlt/select.url?eid=2-s2.0-72949085306&selection=ref&src=s&origin=recordpage | en_HK |
dc.identifier.volume | 21 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.issue | 1 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.spage | 37 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.epage | 42 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.isi | WOS:000272835900005 | - |
dc.publisher.place | United States | en_HK |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | HuynhBa, G=25825004200 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Pjetursson, BE=6506841442 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Sanz, M=7201640876 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Cecchinato, D=6508390388 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Ferrus, J=8589292400 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Lindhe, J=7101988857 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.scopusauthorid | Lang, NP=7201577367 | en_HK |
dc.identifier.citeulike | 6422455 | - |
dc.identifier.issnl | 0905-7161 | - |