File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Survival of glass ionomer restorations placed in primary molars using atraumatic restorative treatment (ART) and conventional cavity preparations: 2-Year results

TitleSurvival of glass ionomer restorations placed in primary molars using atraumatic restorative treatment (ART) and conventional cavity preparations: 2-Year results
Authors
KeywordsAtraumatic restorative treatment
Glass ionomer cement
Primary teeth
Issue Date2004
PublisherJohn Wiley & Sons Ltd. The Journal's web site is located at http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1002/(ISSN)1875-595X
Citation
International Dental Journal, 2004, v. 54 n. 1, p. 42-46 How to Cite?
AbstractObjective: To compare the survival of glass ionomer cement (GIC) restorations placed in a dental clinic setting using both the atraumatic restorative treatment (ART) approach with hand instruments, and conventional cavity preparation with rotary instruments. Method and Materials: Two encapsulated high-strength conventional GICs (Fuji IX GP, Ketac-Molar Aplicap) were placed in 82 Class I and 53 Class II preparations and one encapsulated non-gamma 2 amalgam alloy (GK-amalgam) was placed in 32 Class I preparations, in the primary molars of 60 Chinese children with a mean age of 7.40 ± 1.24 (SD) years. Thus, 9 treatment groups were formed. Results: After two years, there were no significant survival differences found among 7 of the 9 treatment groups (p = 0.99). However, two groups comprising Fuji IX GP and Ketac-Molar Aplicap placed in Class II cavities prepared using the ART approach showed significantly lower restoration survivals (p < 0.001). Only 3 of the 72 initially sealed fissures adjacent to the restorations appeared to retain any GIC material. Conclusions: In a clinic setting, both the ART hand instrument and conventional rotary instrument methods were equally suitable for high Class I restoration survival, but not for Class II restoration survival where the conventional cavity preparation method was preferable.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/66876
ISSN
2015 Impact Factor: 0.967
2015 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.512
ISI Accession Number ID
References

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorYu, Cen_HK
dc.contributor.authorGao, XJen_HK
dc.contributor.authorDeng, DMen_HK
dc.contributor.authorYip, HKen_HK
dc.contributor.authorSmales, RJen_HK
dc.date.accessioned2010-09-06T05:50:05Z-
dc.date.available2010-09-06T05:50:05Z-
dc.date.issued2004en_HK
dc.identifier.citationInternational Dental Journal, 2004, v. 54 n. 1, p. 42-46en_HK
dc.identifier.issn0020-6539en_HK
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/66876-
dc.description.abstractObjective: To compare the survival of glass ionomer cement (GIC) restorations placed in a dental clinic setting using both the atraumatic restorative treatment (ART) approach with hand instruments, and conventional cavity preparation with rotary instruments. Method and Materials: Two encapsulated high-strength conventional GICs (Fuji IX GP, Ketac-Molar Aplicap) were placed in 82 Class I and 53 Class II preparations and one encapsulated non-gamma 2 amalgam alloy (GK-amalgam) was placed in 32 Class I preparations, in the primary molars of 60 Chinese children with a mean age of 7.40 ± 1.24 (SD) years. Thus, 9 treatment groups were formed. Results: After two years, there were no significant survival differences found among 7 of the 9 treatment groups (p = 0.99). However, two groups comprising Fuji IX GP and Ketac-Molar Aplicap placed in Class II cavities prepared using the ART approach showed significantly lower restoration survivals (p < 0.001). Only 3 of the 72 initially sealed fissures adjacent to the restorations appeared to retain any GIC material. Conclusions: In a clinic setting, both the ART hand instrument and conventional rotary instrument methods were equally suitable for high Class I restoration survival, but not for Class II restoration survival where the conventional cavity preparation method was preferable.en_HK
dc.languageengen_HK
dc.publisherJohn Wiley & Sons Ltd. The Journal's web site is located at http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1002/(ISSN)1875-595Xen_HK
dc.relation.ispartofInternational Dental Journalen_HK
dc.subjectAtraumatic restorative treatmenten_HK
dc.subjectGlass ionomer cementen_HK
dc.subjectPrimary teethen_HK
dc.titleSurvival of glass ionomer restorations placed in primary molars using atraumatic restorative treatment (ART) and conventional cavity preparations: 2-Year resultsen_HK
dc.typeArticleen_HK
dc.identifier.openurlhttp://library.hku.hk:4550/resserv?sid=HKU:IR&issn=0020-6539&volume=54&spage=42&epage=46&date=2004&atitle=Survival+of+Glass+Ionomer+Restorations+Placed+in+Primary+Molars+Using+Atraumatic+Restorative+Treatment+(ART)+and+Conventional+Cavity+Preparations:+2-year+Resultsen_HK
dc.identifier.emailYip, HK: kevin.h.k.yip@hkusua.hku.hken_HK
dc.identifier.authorityYip, HK=rp00027en_HK
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.pmid15005472-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-1342302784en_HK
dc.identifier.hkuros91469en_HK
dc.relation.referenceshttp://www.scopus.com/mlt/select.url?eid=2-s2.0-1342302784&selection=ref&src=s&origin=recordpageen_HK
dc.identifier.volume54en_HK
dc.identifier.issue1en_HK
dc.identifier.spage42en_HK
dc.identifier.epage46en_HK
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000227831300006-
dc.publisher.placeUnited Kingdomen_HK
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridYu, C=8322333700en_HK
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridGao, XJ=36848988500en_HK
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridDeng, DM=37118796800en_HK
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridYip, HK=25423244900en_HK
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridSmales, RJ=7005372382en_HK

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats