File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: A Comparison of Three Cephalometric Analysis on the Evaluaton of Orthodontic Treatment

TitleA Comparison of Three Cephalometric Analysis on the Evaluaton of Orthodontic Treatment
三種X線頭影測量分析方法臨床應用的比較研究
Authors
KeywordsCephalometry
Bjork Analysis
Ricketts Analysis
Pancherz Analysis
Issue Date2002
Publisher上海第二醫科大口腔醫學院. The Journal's web site is located at http://shky.chinajournal.net.cn/
Citation
Shanghai Journal of Stomatology, 2002, v. 11 n. 2, p. 97-100 How to Cite?
上海口腔醫學, 2002, v. 11 n. 2, p. 97-100 How to Cite?
AbstractObjective To analyze the reliability of different cephalometric superimposition methods for evaluation of orthodontic treatment. Methods The material consisted of fourteen pairs of cephalograms obtained before and after Herbst treatment. Each pair of the cephalograms were traced, superimposed by means of the three different superimposition methods three times each. A reference grid was used to quantitatively evaluate the sagittal dental and skeletal changes. Results (1) There was no statistically significant difference between the repeated measurements in the three methods respectively, i.e. all the three methods were reliable. (2) There was no significant difference among the three superimposition methods to evaluate the sagittal skeletal and dental changes. (3) Comparing the coefficient of reliability, none of the three methods was suitable for the individual assessment, and Pancherz’ method only was acceptable for assessment of patients in groups. Conclusion The three methods have their own characteristic. The Pancherz method is comparatively direct and effective on quantitative evaluation of orthodontic treatment.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/66477
ISSN
2015 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.120

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorYou, QLen_HK
dc.contributor.authorHagg, EUOen_HK
dc.date.accessioned2010-09-06T05:46:41Z-
dc.date.available2010-09-06T05:46:41Z-
dc.date.issued2002en_HK
dc.identifier.citationShanghai Journal of Stomatology, 2002, v. 11 n. 2, p. 97-100en_HK
dc.identifier.citation上海口腔醫學, 2002, v. 11 n. 2, p. 97-100-
dc.identifier.issn1006-7248en_HK
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/66477-
dc.description.abstractObjective To analyze the reliability of different cephalometric superimposition methods for evaluation of orthodontic treatment. Methods The material consisted of fourteen pairs of cephalograms obtained before and after Herbst treatment. Each pair of the cephalograms were traced, superimposed by means of the three different superimposition methods three times each. A reference grid was used to quantitatively evaluate the sagittal dental and skeletal changes. Results (1) There was no statistically significant difference between the repeated measurements in the three methods respectively, i.e. all the three methods were reliable. (2) There was no significant difference among the three superimposition methods to evaluate the sagittal skeletal and dental changes. (3) Comparing the coefficient of reliability, none of the three methods was suitable for the individual assessment, and Pancherz’ method only was acceptable for assessment of patients in groups. Conclusion The three methods have their own characteristic. The Pancherz method is comparatively direct and effective on quantitative evaluation of orthodontic treatment.-
dc.languagechien_HK
dc.publisher上海第二醫科大口腔醫學院. The Journal's web site is located at http://shky.chinajournal.net.cn/zh_HK
dc.relation.ispartofShanghai Journal of Stomatologyen_HK
dc.relation.ispartof上海口腔醫學-
dc.subjectCephalometry-
dc.subjectBjork Analysis-
dc.subjectRicketts Analysis-
dc.subjectPancherz Analysis-
dc.titleA Comparison of Three Cephalometric Analysis on the Evaluaton of Orthodontic Treatmenten_HK
dc.title三種X線頭影測量分析方法臨床應用的比較研究-
dc.typeArticleen_HK
dc.identifier.openurlhttp://library.hku.hk:4550/resserv?sid=HKU:IR&issn=1006-7248&volume=11&issue=2&spage=97&epage=100&date=2002&atitle=A+Comparison+of+Three+Cephalometric+Analysis+on+the+Evaluaton+of+Orthodontic+Treatmenten_HK
dc.identifier.emailHagg, EUO: euohagg@hkusua.hku.hken_HK
dc.identifier.authorityHagg, EUO=rp00020en_HK
dc.identifier.doi10.3969/j.issn.1006-7248.2002.02.001-
dc.identifier.hkuros67529en_HK
dc.publisher.placeChina-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats