File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Radiation-induced root surface caries restored with glass-ionomer cement placed in conventional and ART cavity preparations: Results at two years

TitleRadiation-induced root surface caries restored with glass-ionomer cement placed in conventional and ART cavity preparations: Results at two years
Authors
Issue Date2005
PublisherAustralian Dental Association Inc. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.ada.org.au/_Australian_Dental_Journal_Public.asp
Citation
Australian Dental Journal, 2005, v. 50, p. 186-190 How to Cite?
AbstractBACKGROUND: There are no published studies comparing the clinical performances of more-viscous glass-ionomer cement (GIC) restorations when placed using conventional and atraumatic restorative treatment (ART) cavity preparation methods to restore root surface caries. METHODS: One dentist used encapsulated Fuji IX GP and Ketac-Molar to restore 72 conventional and 74 ART cavity preparations for 15 patients who had received cervicofacial radiation therapy. Two assessors evaluated the restorations at six, 12, and 24 months for retention, marginal defects and surface wear, and recurrent caries. RESULTS: After two years, the cumulative restoration successes were 65.2 per cent for the conventional and 66.2 per cent for the ART cavity preparations, without statistical or clinical significance (P > 0.50). Restoration dislodgement accounted for 82.8 per cent and marginal defects for 17.2 per cent of all failures. There were no instances of unsatisfactory restoration wear or recurrent caries observed. Teeth with three or more restored cervical surfaces accounted for 79.3 per cent of all failures (P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: For root surface caries restored with GIC, the use of hand instruments only with the ART method was an equally effective alternative to conventional rotary instrumentation for cavity preparation. Larger restorations had higher failures, usually from dislodgement.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/66424
ISSN
2015 Impact Factor: 1.272
2015 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.482
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorHu, JYen_HK
dc.contributor.authorChen, XCen_HK
dc.contributor.authorLi, YQen_HK
dc.contributor.authorSmales, RJen_HK
dc.contributor.authorYip, HKen_HK
dc.date.accessioned2010-09-06T05:46:14Z-
dc.date.available2010-09-06T05:46:14Z-
dc.date.issued2005en_HK
dc.identifier.citationAustralian Dental Journal, 2005, v. 50, p. 186-190en_HK
dc.identifier.issn0045-0421en_HK
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/66424-
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND: There are no published studies comparing the clinical performances of more-viscous glass-ionomer cement (GIC) restorations when placed using conventional and atraumatic restorative treatment (ART) cavity preparation methods to restore root surface caries. METHODS: One dentist used encapsulated Fuji IX GP and Ketac-Molar to restore 72 conventional and 74 ART cavity preparations for 15 patients who had received cervicofacial radiation therapy. Two assessors evaluated the restorations at six, 12, and 24 months for retention, marginal defects and surface wear, and recurrent caries. RESULTS: After two years, the cumulative restoration successes were 65.2 per cent for the conventional and 66.2 per cent for the ART cavity preparations, without statistical or clinical significance (P > 0.50). Restoration dislodgement accounted for 82.8 per cent and marginal defects for 17.2 per cent of all failures. There were no instances of unsatisfactory restoration wear or recurrent caries observed. Teeth with three or more restored cervical surfaces accounted for 79.3 per cent of all failures (P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: For root surface caries restored with GIC, the use of hand instruments only with the ART method was an equally effective alternative to conventional rotary instrumentation for cavity preparation. Larger restorations had higher failures, usually from dislodgement.-
dc.languageengen_HK
dc.publisherAustralian Dental Association Inc. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.ada.org.au/_Australian_Dental_Journal_Public.aspen_HK
dc.relation.ispartofAustralian Dental Journalen_HK
dc.titleRadiation-induced root surface caries restored with glass-ionomer cement placed in conventional and ART cavity preparations: Results at two yearsen_HK
dc.typeArticleen_HK
dc.identifier.openurlhttp://library.hku.hk:4550/resserv?sid=HKU:IR&issn=0045-0421&volume=50&spage=189&epage=90&date=2005&atitle=Radiation-induced+root+surface+caries+restored+with+glass-ionomer+cement+placed+in+conventional+and+ART+cavity+preparations:+Results+at+two+yearsen_HK
dc.identifier.emailYip, HK: kevin.h.k.yip@hkusua.hku.hken_HK
dc.identifier.authorityYip, HK=rp00027en_HK
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.pmid16238217-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-26644444786-
dc.identifier.hkuros114039en_HK
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000232448100009-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats