File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: A patient-based assessment of implant-stabilized and conventional complete dentures

TitleA patient-based assessment of implant-stabilized and conventional complete dentures
Authors
Issue Date2001
PublisherMosby, Inc. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.elsevier.com/locate/prosdent
Citation
Journal Of Prosthetic Dentistry, 2001, v. 85 n. 2, p. 141-147 How to Cite?
AbstractStatement of problem. Outcomes of oral implant therapy have been described primarily in terms of implant survival rates and the durability of implant superstructures. Reports of patient-based outcomes of implant therapy have been sparse, and none of these studies have used oral-specific health status measures. Purpose. This study assessed the impact of implant-stabilized prostheses on the health status of complete denture wearers using patient-based, oral-specific health status measures. It also assessed the influence of preoperative expectations on outcome. Material and methods. Three experimental groups requesting replacement of their conventional complete dentures completed an Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP) and a validated denture satisfaction scale before treatment. One group received an implant-stabilized prosthesis (IG), and 2 groups received new conventional complete dentures (CDG1 and CDG2). After treatment, all subjects completed the health status measures again; preoperative data were compared with postoperative data. Results. Before treatment, satisfaction with complete dentures was low in all 3 groups. Subjects requesting implants (IG and CDG1) had high expectations for implant-stabilized prostheses. Improvement in denture satisfaction and OHIP scores was reported by all 3 groups after treatment. Subjects who received their preferred treatment (IG and CDG2 subjects) reported a much greater improvement than CDG1 subjects. Preoperative expectation levels did not appear to influence satisfaction with the outcomes of implant therapy in IG subjects. Conclusion. Subjects who received implants (IG) that replaced conventional complete dentures reported significant improvement after treatment, as did subjects who requested conventional replacement dentures (CDG2). The OHIP appears useful in identifying patients likely to benefit from implant-stabilized prostheses.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/66356
ISSN
2014 Impact Factor: 1.753
2015 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.507
ISI Accession Number ID
References

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorAllen, PFen_HK
dc.contributor.authorMcMillan, ASen_HK
dc.contributor.authorWalshaw, Den_HK
dc.date.accessioned2010-09-06T05:45:40Z-
dc.date.available2010-09-06T05:45:40Z-
dc.date.issued2001en_HK
dc.identifier.citationJournal Of Prosthetic Dentistry, 2001, v. 85 n. 2, p. 141-147en_HK
dc.identifier.issn0022-3913en_HK
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/66356-
dc.description.abstractStatement of problem. Outcomes of oral implant therapy have been described primarily in terms of implant survival rates and the durability of implant superstructures. Reports of patient-based outcomes of implant therapy have been sparse, and none of these studies have used oral-specific health status measures. Purpose. This study assessed the impact of implant-stabilized prostheses on the health status of complete denture wearers using patient-based, oral-specific health status measures. It also assessed the influence of preoperative expectations on outcome. Material and methods. Three experimental groups requesting replacement of their conventional complete dentures completed an Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP) and a validated denture satisfaction scale before treatment. One group received an implant-stabilized prosthesis (IG), and 2 groups received new conventional complete dentures (CDG1 and CDG2). After treatment, all subjects completed the health status measures again; preoperative data were compared with postoperative data. Results. Before treatment, satisfaction with complete dentures was low in all 3 groups. Subjects requesting implants (IG and CDG1) had high expectations for implant-stabilized prostheses. Improvement in denture satisfaction and OHIP scores was reported by all 3 groups after treatment. Subjects who received their preferred treatment (IG and CDG2 subjects) reported a much greater improvement than CDG1 subjects. Preoperative expectation levels did not appear to influence satisfaction with the outcomes of implant therapy in IG subjects. Conclusion. Subjects who received implants (IG) that replaced conventional complete dentures reported significant improvement after treatment, as did subjects who requested conventional replacement dentures (CDG2). The OHIP appears useful in identifying patients likely to benefit from implant-stabilized prostheses.en_HK
dc.languageengen_HK
dc.publisherMosby, Inc. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.elsevier.com/locate/prosdenten_HK
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Prosthetic Dentistryen_HK
dc.rightsJournal of Prosthetic Dentistry. Copyright © Mosby, Inc.en_HK
dc.titleA patient-based assessment of implant-stabilized and conventional complete denturesen_HK
dc.typeArticleen_HK
dc.identifier.openurlhttp://library.hku.hk:4550/resserv?sid=HKU:IR&issn=0022-3913&volume=85&spage=141&epage=147&date=2001&atitle=A+patient-based+assessment+of+implant-stabilized+and+conventional+complete+denturesen_HK
dc.identifier.emailMcMillan, AS: annemcmillan@hku.hken_HK
dc.identifier.authorityMcMillan, AS=rp00014en_HK
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.1067/mpr.2001.113214en_HK
dc.identifier.pmid11208203-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-0035261225en_HK
dc.identifier.hkuros58739en_HK
dc.relation.referenceshttp://www.scopus.com/mlt/select.url?eid=2-s2.0-0035261225&selection=ref&src=s&origin=recordpageen_HK
dc.identifier.volume85en_HK
dc.identifier.issue2en_HK
dc.identifier.spage141en_HK
dc.identifier.epage147en_HK
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000167512500008-
dc.publisher.placeUnited Statesen_HK
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridAllen, PF=7403501534en_HK
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridMcMillan, AS=7102843317en_HK
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridWalshaw, D=6701842829en_HK

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats