File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Factors influencing ridge alterations following immediate implant placement into extraction sockets

TitleFactors influencing ridge alterations following immediate implant placement into extraction sockets
Authors
Issue Date2010
PublisherWiley-Blackwell Publishing, Inc.. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journals/CLR
Citation
Clinical Oral Implants Research, 2010, v. 21 n. 1, p. 22-29 How to Cite?
AbstractAim: To identify factors that may influence ridge alterations occurring at the buccal aspect of the extraction site following immediate implant placement. Material and methods: In 93 subjects, single-tooth implants were placed immediately into extraction sockets in the maxilla (tooth locations 15-25). A series of measurements describing the extraction site were made immediately after implant installation and at re-entry, 16 weeks later. The implant sites were stratified according to four factors: (i) implant location (anterior/posterior), (ii) cause of tooth extraction (periodontitis/non- periodontitis), (iii) thickness of the buccal bone walls (≤1/>1 mm) and (iv) the dimension of the horizontal buccal gap (≤1/>1 mm). Results: (i) The location where the implant was placed (anterior/posterior) as well as (ii) the thickness of the buccal bone crest and (iii) the size of the horizontal buccal gap significantly influenced the amount of hard tissue alteration that occurred during a 4-month period of healing. At implant sites in the premolar segment, the fill of the horizontal gap was more pronounced than in the incisor-canine segment, while the vertical crest reduction was significantly smaller. Furthermore, at sites where the buccal bone wall was thick (>1 mm) and where the horizontal gap was large (>1 mm), the degree of gap fill was substantial. Conclusions: The thickness of the buccal bone wall as well as the dimension of the horizontal gap influenced the hard tissue alterations that occur following immediate implant placement into extraction sockets. © 2009 John Wiley & Sons A/S.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/66213
ISSN
2015 Impact Factor: 3.464
2015 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.427
ISI Accession Number ID
Funding AgencyGrant Number
AstraTech AB
Funding Information:

This study has been supported by a research grant from AstraTech AB. The authors wish to acknowledge the diligent support regarding study monitoring and data management provided by Ann-Sofie Andersson and Frederik Ceder at the Astra Tech AB.

References

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorFerrus, Jen_HK
dc.contributor.authorCecchinato, Den_HK
dc.contributor.authorPjetursson, EBen_HK
dc.contributor.authorLang, NPen_HK
dc.contributor.authorSanz, Men_HK
dc.contributor.authorLindhe, Jen_HK
dc.date.accessioned2010-09-06T05:44:30Z-
dc.date.available2010-09-06T05:44:30Z-
dc.date.issued2010en_HK
dc.identifier.citationClinical Oral Implants Research, 2010, v. 21 n. 1, p. 22-29en_HK
dc.identifier.issn0905-7161en_HK
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/66213-
dc.description.abstractAim: To identify factors that may influence ridge alterations occurring at the buccal aspect of the extraction site following immediate implant placement. Material and methods: In 93 subjects, single-tooth implants were placed immediately into extraction sockets in the maxilla (tooth locations 15-25). A series of measurements describing the extraction site were made immediately after implant installation and at re-entry, 16 weeks later. The implant sites were stratified according to four factors: (i) implant location (anterior/posterior), (ii) cause of tooth extraction (periodontitis/non- periodontitis), (iii) thickness of the buccal bone walls (≤1/>1 mm) and (iv) the dimension of the horizontal buccal gap (≤1/>1 mm). Results: (i) The location where the implant was placed (anterior/posterior) as well as (ii) the thickness of the buccal bone crest and (iii) the size of the horizontal buccal gap significantly influenced the amount of hard tissue alteration that occurred during a 4-month period of healing. At implant sites in the premolar segment, the fill of the horizontal gap was more pronounced than in the incisor-canine segment, while the vertical crest reduction was significantly smaller. Furthermore, at sites where the buccal bone wall was thick (>1 mm) and where the horizontal gap was large (>1 mm), the degree of gap fill was substantial. Conclusions: The thickness of the buccal bone wall as well as the dimension of the horizontal gap influenced the hard tissue alterations that occur following immediate implant placement into extraction sockets. © 2009 John Wiley & Sons A/S.en_HK
dc.languageengen_HK
dc.publisherWiley-Blackwell Publishing, Inc.. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journals/CLRen_HK
dc.relation.ispartofClinical Oral Implants Researchen_HK
dc.subject.meshAdulten_HK
dc.subject.meshAgeden_HK
dc.subject.meshAged, 80 and overen_HK
dc.subject.meshAlveolar Bone Loss - etiology - prevention & controlen_HK
dc.subject.meshAlveolar Process - surgeryen_HK
dc.subject.meshDental Implantation, Endosseous - methodsen_HK
dc.subject.meshDental Implants, Single-Toothen_HK
dc.subject.meshFemaleen_HK
dc.subject.meshHumansen_HK
dc.subject.meshMaleen_HK
dc.subject.meshMaxilla - surgeryen_HK
dc.subject.meshMiddle Ageden_HK
dc.subject.meshStatistics, Nonparametricen_HK
dc.subject.meshTooth Extractionen_HK
dc.subject.meshTooth Socket - surgeryen_HK
dc.subject.meshTreatment Outcomeen_HK
dc.titleFactors influencing ridge alterations following immediate implant placement into extraction socketsen_HK
dc.typeArticleen_HK
dc.identifier.openurlhttp://library.hku.hk:4550/resserv?sid=HKU:IR&issn=0905-7161&volume=21&spage=22&epage=29&date=2010&atitle=Factors+influencing+ridge+alterations+following+immediate+implant+placement+into+extraction+socketsen_HK
dc.identifier.emailLang, NP:nplang@hkucc.hku.hken_HK
dc.identifier.authorityLang, NP=rp00031en_HK
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01825.xen_HK
dc.identifier.pmid19912273-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-72949114458en_HK
dc.identifier.hkuros169091en_HK
dc.relation.referenceshttp://www.scopus.com/mlt/select.url?eid=2-s2.0-72949114458&selection=ref&src=s&origin=recordpageen_HK
dc.identifier.volume21en_HK
dc.identifier.issue1en_HK
dc.identifier.spage22en_HK
dc.identifier.epage29en_HK
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000272835900003-
dc.publisher.placeUnited Statesen_HK
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridFerrus, J=8589292400en_HK
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridCecchinato, D=6508390388en_HK
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridPjetursson, EB=35976738300en_HK
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridLang, NP=7201577367en_HK
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridSanz, M=7201640876en_HK
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridLindhe, J=7101988857en_HK
dc.identifier.citeulike6422457-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats