Article: Developing a short form of Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP) for dental aesthetics: OHIP-aesthetic

File Download Links for fulltext
(May Require Subscription)
Supplementary
  • Basic View
  • Metadata View
  • XML View
TitleDeveloping a short form of Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP) for dental aesthetics: OHIP-aesthetic
AuthorsWong, AHH1
Cheung, CS1
McGrath, C1
Issue Date2007
PublisherBlackwell Munksgaard. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journals/COM
CitationCommunity Dentistry And Oral Epidemiology, 2007, v. 35 n. 1, p. 64-72 [How to Cite?]
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0528.2007.00330.x
AbstractObjectives: To develop and evaluate shortened forms of the Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP) for discriminating dental aesthetics problems and evaluating dental aesthetic outcomes. Methods: Eighty-seven subjects self-completed the 49-item OHIP at baseline and 63 at follow up (8 weeks later), with the intervention of applying an array of tooth-whitening products. Expert-based approach and regression analysis (on baseline data) were undertaken to derive two subset questionnaires (OHIP-conceptual and OHIP-regression). Their discriminatory ability for dental aesthetics and their responsiveness to tooth whitening were compared with the original OHIP-49, Slade's OHIP-14 and a Chinese short-form version of OHIP. Results: The measures developed were strongly associated with self-rating of dental aesthetics (P < 0.001) unlike OHIP-49 (P = 0.03) or other OHIP short forms (P > 0.05). The measures were also reliable (Cronbach's alpha 0.86) and comparable with the other OHIP forms. In terms of effect size, OHIP-conceptual was more effective in measuring changes than the one based on the regression analysis, the original OHIP-49, OHIP-14 and the Chinese version of the short-form OHIP. It also exhibited a less susceptibility to floor effects than other OHIP forms. Conclusion: A modified short form of the OHIP derived (OHIP-conceptual) was the most favorable in discriminating dental aesthetics, was reliable and most sensitive to the dental aesthetics intervention - tooth whitening. © 2007 The Authors.
ISSN0301-5661
2011 Impact Factor: 1.894
2011 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.093
DOIhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0528.2007.00330.x
ISI Accession Number IDWOS:000243562300008
ReferencesReferences in Scopus
DC Field
Value
dc.contributor.authorWong, AHH
dc.contributor.authorCheung, CS
dc.contributor.authorMcGrath, C
dc.date.accessioned2010-09-06T05:44:27Z
dc.date.available2010-09-06T05:44:27Z
dc.date.issued2007
dc.description.abstractObjectives: To develop and evaluate shortened forms of the Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP) for discriminating dental aesthetics problems and evaluating dental aesthetic outcomes. Methods: Eighty-seven subjects self-completed the 49-item OHIP at baseline and 63 at follow up (8 weeks later), with the intervention of applying an array of tooth-whitening products. Expert-based approach and regression analysis (on baseline data) were undertaken to derive two subset questionnaires (OHIP-conceptual and OHIP-regression). Their discriminatory ability for dental aesthetics and their responsiveness to tooth whitening were compared with the original OHIP-49, Slade's OHIP-14 and a Chinese short-form version of OHIP. Results: The measures developed were strongly associated with self-rating of dental aesthetics (P < 0.001) unlike OHIP-49 (P = 0.03) or other OHIP short forms (P > 0.05). The measures were also reliable (Cronbach's alpha 0.86) and comparable with the other OHIP forms. In terms of effect size, OHIP-conceptual was more effective in measuring changes than the one based on the regression analysis, the original OHIP-49, OHIP-14 and the Chinese version of the short-form OHIP. It also exhibited a less susceptibility to floor effects than other OHIP forms. Conclusion: A modified short form of the OHIP derived (OHIP-conceptual) was the most favorable in discriminating dental aesthetics, was reliable and most sensitive to the dental aesthetics intervention - tooth whitening. © 2007 The Authors.
dc.description.natureLink_to_subscribed_fulltext
dc.identifier.citationCommunity Dentistry And Oral Epidemiology, 2007, v. 35 n. 1, p. 64-72 [How to Cite?]
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0528.2007.00330.x
dc.identifier.citeulike1057135
dc.identifier.doihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0528.2007.00330.x
dc.identifier.epage72
dc.identifier.hkuros126213
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000243562300008
dc.identifier.issn0301-5661
2011 Impact Factor: 1.894
2011 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.093
dc.identifier.issue1
dc.identifier.openurl
dc.identifier.pmid17244139
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-33846433130
dc.identifier.spage64
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/66207
dc.identifier.volume35
dc.languageeng
dc.publisherBlackwell Munksgaard. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journals/COM
dc.publisher.placeDenmark
dc.relation.ispartofCommunity Dentistry and Oral Epidemiology
dc.relation.referencesReferences in Scopus
dc.subject.meshAttitude to Health
dc.subject.meshEsthetics, Dental
dc.subject.meshFollow-Up Studies
dc.subject.meshHumans
dc.subject.meshPatient Satisfaction
dc.subject.meshQuestionnaires
dc.subject.meshReproducibility of Results
dc.subject.meshSensitivity and Specificity
dc.subject.meshTooth Bleaching - adverse effects - instrumentation - methods
dc.subject.meshTooth Discoloration - therapy
dc.subject.meshTreatment Outcome
dc.titleDeveloping a short form of Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP) for dental aesthetics: OHIP-aesthetic
dc.typeArticle
Author Affiliations
  1. The University of Hong Kong