File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Developing a short form of Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP) for dental aesthetics: OHIP-aesthetic

TitleDeveloping a short form of Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP) for dental aesthetics: OHIP-aesthetic
Authors
Issue Date2007
PublisherBlackwell Munksgaard. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journals/COM
Citation
Community Dentistry And Oral Epidemiology, 2007, v. 35 n. 1, p. 64-72 How to Cite?
Abstract
Objectives: To develop and evaluate shortened forms of the Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP) for discriminating dental aesthetics problems and evaluating dental aesthetic outcomes. Methods: Eighty-seven subjects self-completed the 49-item OHIP at baseline and 63 at follow up (8 weeks later), with the intervention of applying an array of tooth-whitening products. Expert-based approach and regression analysis (on baseline data) were undertaken to derive two subset questionnaires (OHIP-conceptual and OHIP-regression). Their discriminatory ability for dental aesthetics and their responsiveness to tooth whitening were compared with the original OHIP-49, Slade's OHIP-14 and a Chinese short-form version of OHIP. Results: The measures developed were strongly associated with self-rating of dental aesthetics (P < 0.001) unlike OHIP-49 (P = 0.03) or other OHIP short forms (P > 0.05). The measures were also reliable (Cronbach's alpha 0.86) and comparable with the other OHIP forms. In terms of effect size, OHIP-conceptual was more effective in measuring changes than the one based on the regression analysis, the original OHIP-49, OHIP-14 and the Chinese version of the short-form OHIP. It also exhibited a less susceptibility to floor effects than other OHIP forms. Conclusion: A modified short form of the OHIP derived (OHIP-conceptual) was the most favorable in discriminating dental aesthetics, was reliable and most sensitive to the dental aesthetics intervention - tooth whitening. © 2007 The Authors.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/66207
ISSN
2013 Impact Factor: 1.944
ISI Accession Number ID
References

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorWong, AHHen_HK
dc.contributor.authorCheung, CSen_HK
dc.contributor.authorMcGrath, Cen_HK
dc.date.accessioned2010-09-06T05:44:27Z-
dc.date.available2010-09-06T05:44:27Z-
dc.date.issued2007en_HK
dc.identifier.citationCommunity Dentistry And Oral Epidemiology, 2007, v. 35 n. 1, p. 64-72en_HK
dc.identifier.issn0301-5661en_HK
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/66207-
dc.description.abstractObjectives: To develop and evaluate shortened forms of the Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP) for discriminating dental aesthetics problems and evaluating dental aesthetic outcomes. Methods: Eighty-seven subjects self-completed the 49-item OHIP at baseline and 63 at follow up (8 weeks later), with the intervention of applying an array of tooth-whitening products. Expert-based approach and regression analysis (on baseline data) were undertaken to derive two subset questionnaires (OHIP-conceptual and OHIP-regression). Their discriminatory ability for dental aesthetics and their responsiveness to tooth whitening were compared with the original OHIP-49, Slade's OHIP-14 and a Chinese short-form version of OHIP. Results: The measures developed were strongly associated with self-rating of dental aesthetics (P < 0.001) unlike OHIP-49 (P = 0.03) or other OHIP short forms (P > 0.05). The measures were also reliable (Cronbach's alpha 0.86) and comparable with the other OHIP forms. In terms of effect size, OHIP-conceptual was more effective in measuring changes than the one based on the regression analysis, the original OHIP-49, OHIP-14 and the Chinese version of the short-form OHIP. It also exhibited a less susceptibility to floor effects than other OHIP forms. Conclusion: A modified short form of the OHIP derived (OHIP-conceptual) was the most favorable in discriminating dental aesthetics, was reliable and most sensitive to the dental aesthetics intervention - tooth whitening. © 2007 The Authors.en_HK
dc.languageengen_HK
dc.publisherBlackwell Munksgaard. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journals/COMen_HK
dc.relation.ispartofCommunity Dentistry and Oral Epidemiologyen_HK
dc.subject.meshAttitude to Healthen_HK
dc.subject.meshEsthetics, Dentalen_HK
dc.subject.meshFollow-Up Studiesen_HK
dc.subject.meshHumansen_HK
dc.subject.meshPatient Satisfactionen_HK
dc.subject.meshQuestionnairesen_HK
dc.subject.meshReproducibility of Resultsen_HK
dc.subject.meshSensitivity and Specificityen_HK
dc.subject.meshTooth Bleaching - adverse effects - instrumentation - methodsen_HK
dc.subject.meshTooth Discoloration - therapyen_HK
dc.subject.meshTreatment Outcomeen_HK
dc.titleDeveloping a short form of Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP) for dental aesthetics: OHIP-aestheticen_HK
dc.typeArticleen_HK
dc.identifier.openurlhttp://library.hku.hk:4550/resserv?sid=HKU:IR&issn=0301-5661&volume=35&spage=64&epage=72&date=2007&atitle=Developing+a+short+form+of+Oral+Health+Impact+Profile+(OHIP)+for+dental+aesthetics:+OHIP-aestheticen_HK
dc.identifier.emailMcGrath, C:mcgrathc@hkucc.hku.hken_HK
dc.identifier.authorityMcGrath, C=rp00037en_HK
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/j.1600-0528.2007.00330.xen_HK
dc.identifier.pmid17244139en_HK
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-33846433130en_HK
dc.identifier.hkuros126213en_HK
dc.relation.referenceshttp://www.scopus.com/mlt/select.url?eid=2-s2.0-33846433130&selection=ref&src=s&origin=recordpageen_HK
dc.identifier.volume35en_HK
dc.identifier.issue1en_HK
dc.identifier.spage64en_HK
dc.identifier.epage72en_HK
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000243562300008-
dc.publisher.placeDenmarken_HK
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridWong, AHH=8687852800en_HK
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridCheung, CS=36902185500en_HK
dc.identifier.scopusauthoridMcGrath, C=7102335507en_HK
dc.identifier.citeulike1057135-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats