File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: An assessment of sensitivity to change of the Oral Health Impact Profile in a clinical trial

TitleAn assessment of sensitivity to change of the Oral Health Impact Profile in a clinical trial
Authors
Issue Date2001
PublisherBlackwell Munksgaard. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journals/COM
Citation
Community Dentistry and Oral Epidemiology, 2001, v. 29 n. 3, p. 175-182 How to Cite?
AbstractPatient-based assessment of oral health outcomes is of growing interest. Measurement of change following clinical intervention is a key property of a health status measure. To date, most of the research on oral health status measurement has focused on construct and discriminant validity of health status measures. Objectives: The objective of this study was to assess sensitivity to change of an oral – specific health status measure, the Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP). Methods: Study subjects were in three groups, namely, edentulous/edentate subjects who requested and received complete implant stabilised oral prostheses (IG, n=26), edentulous/edentate subjects who requested implants but received conventional dentures (CDG1, n=22), and edentulous subjects who had new conventional complete dentures (CDG2, n=35). Data were collected pre- and post-operatively using the OHIP and a validated denture satisfaction questionnaire. Results: All subjects reported similar low levels of denture satisfaction pre-operatively. Denture problems had a more significant impact on oral health-related quality of life (OHRQL) for implant seekers (IG and CDG1 subjects) than subjects seeking conventional dentures (CDG2). Following treatment, significant improvement in satisfaction with oral prostheses and OHRQL was reported by IG and CDG2 subjects; the level of improvement was more moderate for CDG1 subjects. OHIP change scores were correlated with denture satisfaction change scores. Conclusions: It was concluded that sensitivity to change of the OHIP was good. This property was not improved by using statement weights.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/66165
ISSN
2015 Impact Factor: 2.233
2015 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.111

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorAllen, PF-
dc.contributor.authorMcmillan, AS-
dc.contributor.authorLocker, D-
dc.date.accessioned2010-09-06T05:44:07Z-
dc.date.available2010-09-06T05:44:07Z-
dc.date.issued2001-
dc.identifier.citationCommunity Dentistry and Oral Epidemiology, 2001, v. 29 n. 3, p. 175-182-
dc.identifier.issn0301-5661-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/66165-
dc.description.abstractPatient-based assessment of oral health outcomes is of growing interest. Measurement of change following clinical intervention is a key property of a health status measure. To date, most of the research on oral health status measurement has focused on construct and discriminant validity of health status measures. Objectives: The objective of this study was to assess sensitivity to change of an oral – specific health status measure, the Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP). Methods: Study subjects were in three groups, namely, edentulous/edentate subjects who requested and received complete implant stabilised oral prostheses (IG, n=26), edentulous/edentate subjects who requested implants but received conventional dentures (CDG1, n=22), and edentulous subjects who had new conventional complete dentures (CDG2, n=35). Data were collected pre- and post-operatively using the OHIP and a validated denture satisfaction questionnaire. Results: All subjects reported similar low levels of denture satisfaction pre-operatively. Denture problems had a more significant impact on oral health-related quality of life (OHRQL) for implant seekers (IG and CDG1 subjects) than subjects seeking conventional dentures (CDG2). Following treatment, significant improvement in satisfaction with oral prostheses and OHRQL was reported by IG and CDG2 subjects; the level of improvement was more moderate for CDG1 subjects. OHIP change scores were correlated with denture satisfaction change scores. Conclusions: It was concluded that sensitivity to change of the OHIP was good. This property was not improved by using statement weights.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherBlackwell Munksgaard. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journals/COM-
dc.relation.ispartofCommunity Dentistry and Oral Epidemiology-
dc.rightsThe definitive version is available at www.blackwell-synergy.com-
dc.subject.meshDental Prosthesis - psychology - statistics & numerical data-
dc.subject.meshDental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported - psychology - statistics & numerical data-
dc.subject.meshOral Health-
dc.subject.meshQuality of Life-
dc.subject.meshSickness Impact Profile-
dc.titleAn assessment of sensitivity to change of the Oral Health Impact Profile in a clinical trial-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.openurlhttp://library.hku.hk:4550/resserv?sid=HKU:IR&issn=0301-5661&volume=29&spage=175&epage=182&date=2001&atitle=An+assessment+of+responsiveness+of+the+Oral+Health+Impact+Profile+in+a+clinical+trial.en_HK
dc.identifier.emailMcmillan, AS: annemcmillan@hku.hk-
dc.identifier.authorityMcmillan, AS=rp00014-
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.1034/j.1600-0528.2001.290303.x-
dc.identifier.pmid11409676-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-0035377666-
dc.identifier.hkuros58748-
dc.identifier.volume29-
dc.identifier.issue3-
dc.identifier.spage175-
dc.identifier.epage182-
dc.publisher.placeDenmark-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats